Home Blog

Transgender Former Teacher Found Guilty Of Threatening “Murder Spree” At High School In Controversy-Plagued Virginia County

A transgender former teacher in Loudon County, Virginia, has been found guilty after threatening to commit a “murder spree” at a local school and cannibalize the corpses of his victims. Hadyn James Dollery, who also goes by the name “Sophie” and “Cotton Candy,” was found guilty of four of five criminal charges last Friday and faces up to 25 years in prison.

The court heard how Dollery, 19, sent disturbing messages through online messaging platform Discord in April of 2026 and prompted heightened security at two local schools before his arrest. Dollery was convicted of two counts of threatening to injure or kill a person, one count of making threats on school grounds and one count of threatening to damage a building.

The four convictions carry a potential maximum prison sentence of 25 years, although no minimum sentence is required, and sentencing is expected to take place in the coming months. The case has renewed attention on school safety in Loudoun County, a Northern Virginia school district that has faced several high-profile controversies involving alleged threats, student misconduct and administrative accountability in recent years, specifically involving transgender perpetrators.

Dollery had worked as a non-licensed substitute teacher at Eagle Ridge Middle School, while John Champe High School, located in the Aldie area of Loudoun County, was identified as the target of his threats. Prior to becoming a substitute teacher, Dollery was a local student and amateur theater performer.

According to Loudoun Now, the messages at the center of the case were sent on April 15, one day after Dollery experienced a break-up with his romantic partner.

Senior Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Dircia Schubert told jurors that Dollery contacted the former boyfriend at approximately 1:49 a.m via Discord and sent a slurry of messages, including threats to kill the former boyfriend and members of the former boyfriend’s family. Dollery also threatened members of his own family, and promised a “murder spree” at the former boyfriend’s school. Disturbingly, Dollery also described plans to cannibalize one of the victims after killing them.

Prosecutors said the threats were reported to law enforcement by the former boyfriend and another person through Safe2Talk, an application designed to allow students and community members to report potential safety concerns. The reports prompted an investigation into the communications and the possibility that the messages represented a danger to the people named and the school identified as a potential target. Schubert told the jury that Dollery later messaged the former boyfriend about returning a shirt, adding that he wanted it back “if I’m deemed fit to work after this shit I’m about to do.”

Prosecutors presented that statement as part of the wider context of the communications and Dollery’s awareness that his actions could have consequences for his employment.

School officials at Eagle Ridge Middle School, where Dollery had worked, and John Champe High School, the target of the alleged threats, reportedly considered the messages credible and assigned additional security to both schools while authorities investigated. Dollery was arrested in April, several days after the messages were sent. According to reporting on the case, he was taken into custody away from school grounds and subsequently removed from the list of available substitute teachers for Loudoun County Public Schools. The decision to increase security reflected officials’ assessment that the reported statements warranted precautionary measures while law enforcement worked to locate Dollery and evaluate the potential threat.

Evidence discussed during the trial included a box cutter found in Dollery’s backpack and information recovered from his phone. Schubert told jurors that the box cutter was in his backpack and that phone records showed the device had been used to search Google for information about blood.

During the trial, Dollery’s defense attempted to characterize the threats and weapon as “teenage drama” and Dollery being “desperate for attention,” arguing that the prosecution was blowing the threats out of proportion.

The trial therefore centered on the meaning and seriousness of the messages, the context in which they were sent and whether the evidence established the charged offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecutors argued that the alleged threats against individuals and a school, together with the other evidence presented, demonstrated the seriousness of the conduct.

After beginning deliberations on October 8, the jury returned to court the next day and found Dollery guilty on four of five total counts. The jury acquitted Dollery on the third count of threatening to injure or kill a person.

Following the verdict, defense attorneys told Judge Matthew Snow that they planned to ask the court to grant Dollery bond the following week. A bond request is separate from sentencing and does not alter the convictions returned by the jury. The court will determine whether to grant the request under the applicable legal standards, while sentencing will establish the punishment imposed for the offenses.

The maximum potential prison term reported for the four convictions is 25 years, but that figure represents the upper limit rather than a prediction of the sentence Dollery will receive. A sentencing hearing is expected to be scheduled in the coming weeks.

Dollery’s case has unfolded against the backdrop of earlier school safety controversies in Loudoun County, including a pair of sexual assaults at two separate high schools in 2021 that prompted intense public scrutiny of the school district’s handling of student misconduct allegations.

Those incidents involved a 15-year-old “gender fluid” male student who was given access to the female restrooms on the basis of his self-declared “gender identity.”

The first incident occurred at Stone Bridge High School on May 28, 2021. According to court proceedings and later investigative reports, the student, who was able to be identified as Hunter Heckel after he turned 18, sexually assaulted a female classmate in a school bathroom. Some reports suggested he was wearing a skirt at the time of the attack.

A juvenile court judge subsequently found him responsible for the offense. After he was barred from returning to Stone Bridge, the student was transferred to Broad Run High School, where he sexually assaulted another female student in an empty classroom.

In November 2021, a juvenile court judge found him responsible for the second incident following a no-contest plea to charges involving abduction and sexual battery. The fact that the same student was involved in two incidents at separate schools became a central focus of national public concern, particularly as questions of what role the school board’s gender identity policies played in their inadequate measures to protect female students.

In December 2022, a special grand jury released a report sharply criticizing Loudoun County Public Schools’ handling of the incidents. The report identified serious communication failures among school administrators and other agencies, as well as missed opportunities to respond more effectively before the second assault. The grand jury also concluded that former Superintendent Scott Ziegler had made a false statement during a June 2021 school board meeting when he denied knowing about sexual assaults in school bathrooms.

A separate third-party review made public in September 2023 also criticized the district’s handling of its Title IX responsibilities, which concern sex-based discrimination and sexual harassment in educational settings. The review found that the school system should have acted more promptly in investigating the first incident.

Heckel was subsequently released from a juvenile treatment center in 2024 despite a judge noting that his psychosexual assessment report was highly concerning.


Reduxx is your source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% independent! Support our mission by making a donation.

Trans-Identified Male Arrested After Allegedly Stabbing “Transphobic” Man 13 Times In “Self-Defense”

A trans-identified male has been charged with first-degree murder after allegedly stabbing a 50-year-old man 13 times on Chicago’s South Side. Prosecutors say the horrific crime was committed in front of a 7-year-old child, and the brutal attack caused the tip of the knife to break off and embed in the victim’s skull.

Kelly Day, 32, of Chatham, was charged following the October 7 killing in the 1400 block of East 87th Street. The victim, Larry Young, was taken to the University of Chicago Medical Center, where he died.

At a detention hearing on October 10, prosecutors said Young pushed Day before walking away towards a gas station across the street. According to the prosecution’s account, Day followed him and the two fought. Surveillance footage allegedly shows Day standing over Young as he lay on the ground and repeatedly stabbing his head, neck and upper shoulders.

Authorities say a pathologist recovered a broken blade tip from Young’s skull. The medical examiner determined that he died from multiple sharp force injuries.

Assistant State Attorney Sara Grgurovic also described an earlier confrontation involving Day at a McDonald’s, where a group of people had mocked Day for using the women’s toilets. Day subsequently told his wife that he did not want “bullies” to get away with making fun of him for being trans.

However, Young is not believed to have beeb part of the group who ridiculed Day. Young approached Day later on that evening while he was with his wife and his stepson as they walked along 87th Street, making comments about Day being transgender that prosecutors say prompted an argument. Day became “extremely angry” and resisted his wife’s attempts to pull him away, according to prosecutors.

After the stabbing, which took place in full view of Day’s own 7-year-old stepson, prosecutors say Day gave two different accounts of his injury in calls to 911, initially claiming that he had been hurt while defending himself against a “pervert,” while in a later call, he said he had cut himself while cooking.

Day allegedly discarded the knife before seeking treatment for a cut finger at Jackson Park Hospital, where he was ultimately arrested. Investigators recovered a knife with part of its blade missing.

After his arrest, Day claimed self-defense, telling investigators that Young had used a bigoted slur, made a gun gesture and threatened to have someone beat up him and his wife. Judge John Hock ordered Day detained pending trial, citing the brutality of the attack among the reasons for his decision, with Day’s next court appearance scheduled for October 13.

Since news of the arrest, multiple news outlets have focused on the alleged “transphobia” Day claimed to have been the victim of in the lead up to Young’s murder.

The Chicago Tribune quoted Isa Noyola, a trans-identified male who directs the Border Butterfly Project, attributing the incident to “the political climate, the social climate that we’re living in.” Noyola blamed “hate groups” and political leaders for demonizing trans-identified people. The report also discussed Mayor Brandon Johnson’s “Transfemicide Working Group,” an initiative concerned with the killing of trans-identified males, despite the person killed in this case being Young. 

Hoodline’s headline read “Judge Orders South Side Trans Woman Held in Fatal Stabbing of Bully”, labelling Young a bully without quotation marks. Prosecutors had attributed the remark about “bullies” to Day, referring to the separate group at McDonald’s before he encountered Young.

If convicted, Day may be placed in a women’s prison in accordance with precedents set by previous litigation backed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in the state.

In December 2025, Reduxx reported that Jordan Kuykendall, also known as “Sora”, had been moved to Logan Correctional Center, a women’s prison, while serving a 40-year sentence for the 2013 stabbing murder of his former girlfriend, 17-year-old Erin Schneider. She was found dead just hours before a court appearance concerning an emergency protection order sought by her mother.

In a separate investigation, Reduxx detailed the case of Andre Cashmere Patterson, also known as “Janiah Monroe”, who strangled his cellmate, Kimani Muhammad, in Cook County jail in 2006. He was similarly transferred to Logan in April 2019 following ACLU-backed “discrimination” lawsuit.

Two months after that transfer, a female inmate filed a report alleging that Patterson had raped her. In a subsequent lawsuit, she accused prison staff of trying to classify the assault as consensual and coercing her to retract her allegation. The lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice in September 2022.

Reduxx also reported on John Wesley Finnegan, who began calling himself “Hannah Dagny” years into a 22-year sentence for strangling his mother, Mary, in 2008. He later told police that he had sexually abused her corpse.

In December 2025, Reduxx documented Finnegan’s placement at Decatur Correctional Center, an Illinois women’s prison with a mother-baby unit. Chicago-based lawyers had also sought clemency for him, portraying him as a survivor of abuse.


Reduxx is your source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% independent! Support our mission by making a donation.

SWEDEN: Trans-Identifying Egyptian Migrant Who Murdered His Children Accused of Sexually Harassing Female Inmates in Women’s Prison

A father who murdered his two young children and was transferred to a women’s prison after beginning to identify as transgender has been accused of sexually harassing female inmates while authorities look the other way. Paulus Said Foukaih Abdelshahed, an Egyptian national, was transferred to a women’s prison after changing his name to “Lily,” where he is serving a life sentence for the killings.

On April 23, 2024, police and ambulances services were dispatched to Abdelshahed’s residence in response to a call that he had made. Abdelshahed told emergency services that his two children – a boy and a girl, both under the age of 10 – were not breathing, according to a criminal indictment lodged in November that year.

When officers arrived at the residence, they found both children dead. Court documents and subsequent reporting state that prosecutors determined Abdelshahed had placed bags over each child’s head and pumped helium into the bags through a hose, depriving them of oxygen. The prosecution described the killings as intentional, carefully planned, and particularly ruthless. Investigators recovered items from the home consistent with this method, including bags, tape, and gas-related equipment.

Before the murders, for example, Paul Abdelshahed had Googled “killed his own children,” “die together” and searched for “the most gentle way to kill someone.”

Abdelshahed admitted to killing the children during the investigation, and admission prosecutors cited alongside forensic findings and other physical evidence. A psychological examination ultimately concluded that Abdelshahed did not suffer from a serious mental disorder of the kind that would justify sentencing him to compulsory psychiatric care rather than prison.

In December 2024, the Södertälje District Court convicted him on both counts and sentenced him to life imprisonment and deportation in the event he was ever released. Abdelshahed quickly appealed the verdict, arguing that the court should have imposed psychiatric care rather than a life sentence. However, his appeal was quashed by the Svea Court of Appeal in February 2025.

Yet during this process, Abdelshahed had applied to change his sex marker on official identification documents, and legally changed his name to “Lily”. As a result, it was discovered he had been transferred from Tidaholm men’s prison into a women’s prison in Ystad (Ystadsanstalten) some time near the end of 2025.

Abdelshahed began crossdressing publicly in 2023, when he would go to his job at Scania in Södertälje dressed up as “Lily”. On some occasions, he would also wear a wig and women’s clothes when picking up his children from school.

During police questioning that followed his initial arrest, Abdelshahed appeared to blame his “gender dysphoria” for the murders of his two children. “I was born in the wrong body… If I were born Lily, I would be happy and still have my children… [and] live my life as it is,” he told authorities.

New reports tell of how Abdelshahed has been accused of continuous sexual harassment by multiple female inmates at the women’s prison where he is being held. Correctional officers employed at Ystad and six inmates came forward to tell Expressen of the ongoing “inappropriate behavior”, which includes Abdelshahed exposing himself to the women there.

According to the report, Abdelshahed walks around the facility while wearing a short night gown without underwear, with his penis exposed. “[He doesn’t] wear underwear, like the rest of us do. When I and others have told the staff, we are told that we are LGBTQI-hostile,” said a woman who was recently incarcerated at Ystad.

One woman who suffers from PTSD after surviving a sexual assault has had a panic attack after seeing Abdelshahed leave his room wearing nothing but a short night gown. Despite this, she was the one reprimanded by staff for inappropriate behavior, not Abdelshahed.

Another inmate explained that Abdelshahed repeatedly slaps her on the rear. “He has told me that he likes women, which makes me even more uncomfortable,” she said.

Still another inmate says that he has tried to enter the shower room — an area which can’t be locked — while other female inmates were showering on several occasions. She described the situation as a “horror scenario”, and said that he has walked in on her as she did her laundry there just to expose his penis to her: “The shower room also serves as a laundry room and Lily deliberately goes there when I’m washing, just to show [himself] naked,” the woman said.

Other inmates also describe how Abdelshahed invites younger women to his room on the premise of applying their makeup. Staff who came forward to Expressen reported feeling confused about how to handle the situation, and fear of retaliation from management for voicing concerns.

Additionally, reports of sexual harassment have been filed against Abdelshahed with both the police and the Ombudsman, but the cases have been dropped. According to Chief Safety Officer Jimmy Nyberg, female inmates “feel that their experiences of the challenges are not taken seriously by management.”

Investigators recovered this image of Paul Abdelshahed from his computer in 2023.

Abdelshahed is said to have initially lied to the female inmates about the reason for his incarceration. He reportedly told them he was only going to be held at the women’s prison for one year. Female inmates discovered the truth of his life sentence only after seeing a news segment about him on television.

“There was an entire correctional force for Lily’s department. They guarded him from other inmates until he was allowed to move out to a special ward in eight places and since then he has been there,” one woman said.

Inmates also described how Abdelshahed would wear makeup when he first arrived, but has now given up on applying cosmetics. “You can see without any problems that it is a man,” a correctional officer said.

The director of the women’s prison at Ystad, Anders Jansson said: ”There is nothing in our regulations that specifies how we should handle these cases. We have determined that this person is a woman. [Abdelshahed] is a woman, and if you have a female personal identity number, you’re going to be placed in a women’s prison.”

Sweden’s Legal Gender Recognition Act (Könstillhörighetslagen) officially came into force on July 1, 2025. The legislation streamlined the process for changing sex-identifiers on legal documents, without a requirement for surgical intervention. Previously, under a law passed in 1972, legal sex changes required approval from the Legal Advisory Council of the National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen), as well as a formal psychiatric diagnosis of transsexualism, or gender dysphoria. Under the new process, an applicant needs only a healthcare statement confirming an experience of “gender identity”, with no formal psychiatric diagnosis required.

Late last year, a trans-identified male and convicted pedophile was arrested as the prime suspect in the brutal murder of a young woman in the residential area of Rönninge, Sweden. Robin Andersson, who recently began calling himself “Vilma,” was arrested on December 30 and detained under suspicion of murder and the gross desecration of a corpse.

Andersson had previously attempted to kidnap a 10-year-old girl in 2019 and was found in possession of over 42,000 files depicting child sexual abuse and graphic images of female corpses. Andersson had targeted the girl while wearing a black mask, and equipped with zip ties and duct tape, attempted to force the girl into his car. The child managed to escape, and during court proceedings Andersson described his predatory behavior as a “cry for help.”

While under suspicion for the attempted abduction, a forensic investigation uncovered the significant quantity of graphic content in Andersson’s possession, which included both depictions of dead women and child sexual abuse.

The female corpses were also dismembered, as they were photographs from autopsy examinations. The convicted pedophile was also reportedly searching specifically for autopsy images of female genitalia.

Andersson’s internet search history showed that he was looking for information about drugging girls and disposing of their corpses. Investigators were able to track down certain internet searches he had made, such as: “Make someone unconscious,” “chloroform,” and searches for dead female bodies.

A forensic psychiatric examination conducted at the time determined that one of Andersson’s driving forces behind the attempted abduction was his “sexual interest in children and death,” adding that he “does not believe that the plaintiff has been harmed by the act and states that it is not clear that the children depicted in the abuse material feel bad about it.”


Reduxx is your source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% independent! Support our mission by making a donation.

GERMANY: Transgender Ex-Police Officer Sentenced To 39 Months In Prison For Rape of Teenage Girl

A former police officer in Germany has been sentenced to 3 years and 3 months in prison for the rape of a teen girl. Maja Schmid, who previously worked for the Federal Police Inspectorate in Rosenheim, was also found in possession of sexual abuse materials featuring children as young as 3 years old.

Schmid, 55, was sentenced on Tuesday at the Traunstein Regional Court after a trial that lasted a total of three days. While it was believed that Schmid would make a comprehensive confession that would spare the teenage victim from having to give a potentially traumatizing testimony in court, the victim was ultimately required to speak before the court, though did so over a video feed to maintain distance from the perpetrator.

While the details on the assault are limited due to the age of the victim, it is known that the girl is the daughter of one of Schmid’s friends, and that the assault occurred during a motorcycle roadtrip. It is unclear if the child’s parents were aware of this outing or gave permission for it to occur.

Schmid had previously targeted the girl for sexual abuse, sending her a pornographic WhatsApp message while on shift at the police station in 2024. The next year, he took the girl, then 15, on a motorcycle trip. After stopping at a restaurant on the A8 motorway near Irschenberg, Schmid approached the girl while she was in the female bathroom, pushed her against a wall, and raped her.

The indictment describes the teenager as being in shock immediately after the alleged assault. It says she was unable to respond in fear before Schmid left the cubicle. The girl then allegedly locked herself inside the bathroom and suffered what was described as a serious anxiety attack.

Schmid posing in front of his showpiece Cadillac. Photo source: FACEBOOK

At the time of the attack, Schmid was already under investigation by cybercrime specialists at the Bamberg Public Prosecutor General’s Office, who had received a tip from a US-based organization indicating that Schmid may be in possession of child pornography. But Schmid’s fiancée was ultimately responsible for setting the assault investigation in motion after discovering predatory communications between him and the minor on his phone. The report resulted in Schmid’s devices being seized and analyzed.

Police found that Schmid had multiple devices containing thousands of child sexual abuse images and videos, some of them extremely graphic. The youngest children depicted were apparently only three or four years old. 

Police also uncovered videos Schmid had recorded of himself sexually abusing a dog. However, the bestiality media was not taken into consideration in the verdict. According to the presiding judge, bestiality pornography is punishable only if it is intended for distribution.

Schmid was ultimately sentenced to 3 years and 3 months in prison. In explaining the verdict, the presiding judge took into account a letter of apology Schmid had written and his commitment to pay the victim €11,000 in compensation. The judge also insisted that, despite his crimes, Schmid was “not a pedophile.”

Throughout the case, Schmid’s identity was censored by German media. But though most German outlets blurred his face and various tattoos in an attempt to keep him anonymous, a photo posted by OVB Online and Rosenheim24 of Schmid in court showed him with an uncovered arm tattoo, and Reduxx managed to confirm his identity by cross-referencing the tattoo against an uncensored photo posted to his Facebook. 

Schmid was previously profiled by Himmeblau on his classic Cadillac Coupé DeVille, which he often brought to various car shows in his region. In the article, Schmid is described as a “woman” with a “delicate soul.” The article also notes that Schmid is 6′ tall “without heels,” and had been a federal police officer for 35 years at the time of its publication.

Disturbingly, some German media outlets failed to note Schmid was a biological male, and instead referred to him simply as a “police woman” or “female police officer.” In one article, published on October 6 by Süddeutsche Zeitung, the case is included as an example of female sexual crimes.

“Statistically speaking, women are significantly in the minority as perpetrators in cases of this kind,” the Süddeutsche Zeitung article begins, “But women, too, can be violent, can inflict sexual violence on others, and can commit rape. Even as police officers.”

Schmid was reportedly held in a women’s jail for the first half of his pretrial detention, but was transferred to the men’s unit at Munich-Stadelheim prison earlier this year. His defense attorney has suggested that he is attempting to be moved back to a women’s facility.


Reduxx is your source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% independent! Support our mission by making a donation.

FRANCE: Women’s Rights Activists Facing Possible Prison Sentence, €45000 Fine for ‘Transphobic’ Comments

Marguerite Stern [L] and Dora Moutot [R]

Two women’s rights activists in France are facing a potential one-year prison sentence and a €45,000 fine for expressing criticism of gender identity ideology. A government-funded LGBT activist organization has filed six legal complaints against Marguerite Stern and Dora Moutot alleging that public comments and published posts they made regarding transgenderism constitute criminal hate speech.

In June, Moutot received a registered letter informing her that the non-profit organization Familles LGBT had initiated legal action against her and Stern over statements they had published in the manifesto of their website, Femelliste, as well as social media posts and quotes from an interview with Stern.

Familles LGBT attorney Étienne Deshoulières accuses Moutot and Stern of making “public insults against a group of persons based on their gender identity,” as well as “public incitement to hatred or violence”. The complaint also refers to Stern as a “militant feminist” and Moutot as an “essentialist feminist,” and slurs them with the dehumanizing label “TERF” (trans-exclusionary radical feminist), an acronym frequently used by trans activists to call for, and justify, violence against women.

One statement highlighted as “public insult” is taken from the Femelliste website, and is therefore levied against both Stern and Moutot. “Currently we find ourselves in a situation where men, ‘trans women’, demand access to our spaces: they win sports competitions in the women’s category, are incarcerated in women’s prisons and sometimes go so far as to rape their female co-inmates, are allowed to enter our single-sex spaces (changing rooms, toilets, centers for women victims of violence),” reads the site’s manifesto.

Other statements on Moutot and Stern’s website that are listed in the lawsuit include, “On what grounds should trans women’s fear of being mocked in men’s restrooms take precedence over women’s fear of being raped?” and “Of course, not all trans people are predators, but we are forced to be wary because transgenderism can be weaponized by any man to access women’s spaces.” The latter statement is characterized as “incitement to hatred or violence”.

In a video made by Stern and Moutot announcing the lawsuit and launching a crowdfunder to cover their legal fees, they point out that it is “strange” to have been accused by attorney Deshoulières of “making sweeping generalizations about trans people,” only to then also be accused of “public insult” over a quote which begins with the caveat, “of course, not all trans people are predators.”

Another example of “public insult” cited by Familles LGBT‘s counsel is a post made to X by Stern which contains a video of an adult man who identifies as a baby. “This man identifies as a baby. So what do we do if he demands to go to preschool, just like trans women demand access to women’s spaces? Do we say yes to pedophilia? Do we try to cure him, or do we applaud?”

Yet another claim against Stern refers to a single sentence from an April 2023 interview with the outlet Breizh: “Under the guise of tolerance and inclusivity, we end up celebrating the mental disorders of people who are unwell.”

Familles LGBT functions primarily as an online legal resource toolkit and informational hub for topics such as adoption and surrogacy. The organization promotes the concept of polygamy, which it refers to as a “trouple” (or “throuple” in English). Downloadable resources on the site were created by lawyer and gay rights activist Étienne Deshoulières.

The Director of Publication for Familles LGBT, Antoine Framery, is also a gay rights activist and shares a close connection with Deshoulières. They work in tandem to run Fiertés Rurales, an association dedicated to bringing Pride marches to rural environments. Deshoulières co-founded the association and serves as its President, while Framery handles communications and media strategies.

The organization Familles LGBT functions in partnership with the associations Mousse and STOP Homophobie, alongside pro bono legal contributions from Deshoulières Avocats, run by the aforementioned attorney. Framery has served as an attaché de presse (press officer) for STOP Homophobie alongside Deshoulières.

A portion of funding for French non-profits like STOP Homophobie, Mousse, Familles LGBT, and Fiertés Rurales comes from the DILCRAH (Délégation Interministérielle à la Lutte Contre le Racisme, l’Antisémitisme et la Haine anti-LGBT), a government delegate body under the Prime Minister that distributes annual financial grants to local and national LGBTQIA+ projects. Local authorities also contribute taxpayer-funding; for example, the Mayor of Paris subsidizes LGBTQIA+ campaigns and events like the Fiertés Rurales marches.

Another core income stream for the activist groups led by attorney Deshoulières comes from litigation. When courts rule in favor of the LGBTQIA+ associations Deshoulières represents, the defendants may be ordered to pay civil damages directly to his non-profits. In individual defamation or hate speech cases, these typically range from €1,000 to €5,000 per association involved.

However, in some cases, defendants are ordered to pay damages to either the state or both the state and the non-profit organizations run by Deshoulières. The activist’s law firm has initiated nearly 200 lawsuits with the vast majority related to cases of “hate speech”. These cases have accumulated over a period of over a decade, beginning roughly around 2013 up to the present day.

Both Mousse and STOP Homophobie, which are represented by Deshoulières, have previously instigated legal proceedings against Moutot; she was ordered to pay civil damages to the state, and to Deshoulières’ organizations.

Unlike Stern, Moutot has already been convicted of “public insult” by a French court and is being targeted for a second time. In May 2026, after three years of legal proceedings, Moutot was found guilty of “transphobia” for saying that men have penises. The proceedings were instigated by Mousse and STOP Homophobie, and Deshoulières served as the prosecuting attorney.

Moutot made the statement during an October 2022 episode of the popular talk show Quelle Époque!, where she had been invited as a guest to debate a trans-identified male named Nicolas “Marie” Cau, the mayor of Tilloy-lez-Marchiennes. While discussing the issue of men who claim to be transgender women, Moutot stated, “As women, we are obliged to be wary of people with penises.”

In its ruling, the court argued that Moutot had reduced “transgender women” to “their male attribute.”

“By referring to them as ‘penis people’ whom ‘women’ are ‘forced to distrust’, the defendant first assigns transgender women to their penis, that is, to their male sexual attribute of birth, while denying their female gender identity since they are opposed to ‘women’, the defendant thus implicitly considering that transgender women are not women,” the verdict read.

“This statement, which in a generalizing and essentializing way denies the gender identity of those concerned and assigns them to a masculine sexual attribute by associating the latter with a state of danger for cisgender women, is outrageous towards transgender women because of their sex and their gender identity.”

During the debate, Quelle Époque! presenter Léa Salamé had asked Moutot whether she regarded the mayor as a woman, to which Moutot replied, “To me, Marie Cau is a man.” A statement released by Mousse accused Moutot of “violently attacking” Cau by calling him both a man, and a “transfeminine man.”

Incredibly Moutot was fined €1,000, to be paid to the state, as well as the payment of €500 in damages to each of the three trans activist associations who backed Cau’s legal complaint, and an additional €2,000 to cover the court costs, which had come from public funding.

In September 2022, Cau published an autobiography titled Madame Mayor (Madame le Maire) wherein he described his urge to wear women’s clothing, an activity which he says brings about the “height of happiness” for him.

“Once I was alone in the house, I put on my girl’s clothes. A feeling of happiness, of liberation. Dressed like this, I can talk about myself in feminine terms and I can breathe,” Cau wrote. “Finally. I am myself. Shortly after puberty, I would also wear make-up… It became a bit like a drug, an addiction, because it feels so good that I would try to find that pleasure again.”

Cau, backed by three trans activist organizations who are funded by taxpayers – Adheos, Mousse and SOS Homophobie – filed a criminal complaint against Moutot over her comments in February 2023. Attorney Étienne Deshoulières, who is behind the current litigation against Moutot and Stern, has represented all three activist organizations; and, while also representing Cau’s claim against Moutot, argued that her comments constituted “advocating violence against transgender individuals” — though the final ruling tossed out that claim, stating her remarks did not “incite the public, implicitly or explicitly, to violence, discrimination or hatred”.

Yet remarkably, French prosecutors have declined to take action after Moutot and Stern lodged their own formal complaints against trans activists who publicly called for them to be murdered.

Moutot, along with her colleague Marguerite Stern, have for years endured violent death threats. Since 2019, both women have been relentlessly harassed on social media, which escalated into the public sphere. Both women have been the target of “messages calling for us to ‘smash our heads off,’ slogans like ‘one TERF, one bullet’ or ‘transphobes to the fire’ chanted publicly,” and calls to “physically and violently oppose our entire existence.”

Moutot has documented public graffiti with her name, calling her a “danger” to society. Other threats published online urged people to “settle things with knives,” while still others encouraged supporters to “burn” and “smash” her.

That month, Moutot and Stern filed their first complaint — despite having had death threats hurled at them for years by that point. In the report, they emphasized that, during demonstrations in both Strasbourg and Paris on May 4, 5, and 6, activists had called them out by name, shouting for them to be executed with the following statements: “Dora Moutot to the bottom of the Rhine!”, “Transphobes to the fire and Stern in the middle!,” and “TERFs to the stake!”

On May 6, 2024, trans activists can be seen on a video recording chanting death threats at Moutot and Stern outside of Assas University in Paris where they had been invited to speak about a book they wrote together critical of gender identity ideology titled “Transmania.”

Demonstrators surrounded the entrance and shouted, “A TERF, a bullet, social justice,” at the two women as they were escorted by police. “They have no shame,” said Stern in footage depicting the scene. “How can they say that in front of police?” marveled Moutot.

However, despite being provided with video evidence, the prosecutor’s office dismissed the investigation in August 2025, claiming it was impossible for them to “identify the perpetrators of the acts.”

In October 2024, Stern and Moutot filed a new criminal complaint against the website Paris-luttes.info and against social media company X on charges of death threats and incitement to commit a crime.

On October 14, 2024, an opinion piece titled “Trans Ultra Violence” was published on the website Paris-luttes.info. The article was explicitly aimed at Moutot and Stern, and called for supporters to “smash their heads” in order for “their deadly ideas to disappear forever.”

“We are not opposing transphobes and fascists in the merry world of intellectual debate, nor are we trying to impose ourselves in the media: we are physically and violently opposing their entire existence, just as they oppose ours,” reads the article, There will be no possible reconciliation with fascists, and one day we will have to settle things. Fear must take root permanently in their camp and in their minds for their deadly ideas to disappear forever. This can only be achieved through force and violence, and therefore by smashing their heads. In this respect, a telescopic baton seems like a step in the right direction.”

The website deliberately omitted the author’s name, though the article states that he is a trans-identified male: “It’s not because we grew up as boys that we seek out and use violence. We are violent because we are women, and this experience fully justifies any violence we might perpetrate.”

Stern and Moutot have repeatedly had to cancel speaking events out of concern for their own safety due to the deluge of threats they received.

In April 2023, for instance, Stern had intended to speak at a symposium in Nantes. The event was unrelated to the issue of gender identity ideology, and instead focused on the plight of Afghan and Iranian women. However, the organizer, The Comité Laïcité République (CLR – Republic Secularism Committee), an organization dedicated to promoting secularism “as a force for reflection, dialogue, with a balanced tone,” issued a statement on April 5 explaining that the event had been postponed.

“Numerous threats inciting violence were made on social media, including the distribution of our poster announcing the event crossed out with a knife, with calls for counter-demonstrations due to the presence of Ms. Stern, an activist feminist, critic of transgender ideology,” read the CLR’s statement.

“This led the organizers to postpone this event for the sake of preserving the safety of the speakers, of all the participants, and to prevent the Château from suffering any damage. The Comité Laïcité République lodged a complaint and informed the Prefect of these threats.”

In September 2024, trans activists set off a bomb at a venue where Stern and Moutot were schedule to speak. The conference, titled Comment L’idéologie Transgenre Détruit des Vies? (How Transgender Ideology Destroys Lives), sought to discuss the harms of both medical transitioning and the aggression of trans activism. Vandalism on the front of the venue read “Dirty TERF,” the same acronym, and incitement to violence against women, used by Familles LGBT lawyer Deshoulières in the recent legal complaint against them.

This incident, in conjunction with the “Trans Ultra Violence” article, resulted in their decision to cancel a conference in Brussels the following month. The venue, Café Laïque, had in 2022 been host to a dangerous demonstration where trans activists hurled cattle feces to protest a talk critical of the concept of a “transgender child,” presented by child psychiatrist Caroline Eliacheff and professor Céline Masson.

On October 2, United Nations Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls published a statement expressing support for Moutot and condemning her recent conviction, which she is currently appealing.

““As women, saying that we need to exercise caution around men, particularly where there are reasons to fear for our safety, does not in itself constitute hate speech,” said UN official Reem Alsalem. “Such expression can be reasonable and legitimate in the context of women’s safety and the debate on women-only spaces. Women should not be sanctioned for expressing concerns about their own safety or that of other women and girls.”

““Protecting people from discrimination and violence is an important human rights obligation,” Alsalem added. “It must, however, remain compatible with freedom of opinion and expression, the equal participation of women in public debate and the right of all women to live free from violence and intimidation. Simply expressing views on sex, gender or the specific needs of women based on their sex should not constitute grounds for harassment, intimidation or sanction.”

The Special Rapporteur also highlighted the death threats that had been directed at Moutot.

“The apparent contrast between the use of criminal proceedings in response to Moutot’s public statements and the lack of effective outcomes in investigations into the threats against her raises concerns regarding equality before the law, due diligence and the right to an effective remedy,” Alsalem said. She urged French authorities to take appropriate steps to ensure Moutot’s safety, and to “guarantee that women can participate in public debate on sex and gender without violence, intimidation or disproportionate restrictions on their freedom of expression.”


Reduxx is your source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% independent! Support our mission by making a donation.

US: Man Who Brutally Murdered Female Hiker Blames ‘Gender Identity’ Struggles, Avoids Death Penalty

An Arizona man who fatally stabbed a woman 15 times and blamed his “gender identity and sexuality” for the brutal slaying has now avoided the death penalty. Zion Teasley, who wrote about his belief he was transgender in his diary in the days leading up to the slaying, told police he had viciously murdered 29-year-old Lauren Heike in April 2023 after flying into a jealous rage over her beauty.

The court heard that Teasley ambushed Heike and chased her along a hiking trail located near her home in Arizona before repeatedly stabbing her to death. Teasley and the victim had never interacted before the killing. He then abandoned her body, which a neighbor discovered while walking their dog a few days later. Police arrested Teasley after connecting him to DNA evidence found on Heike’s shoe.

Days after killing her, Teasley accessed photos of Heike from her social media accounts. Investigators also reportedly found photos of him wearing an outfit they say was similar to what Heike was wearing when he stabbed her to death.

During interrogation, Teasley told investigators he had been struggling with issues of sexuality and “gender identity,” and at one point, when shown a photo of Heike, stated, “That’s what I would want to look like.”

A nearly 400-page police report obtained by ABC15 revealed messages, internet searches, and journal entries in which Teasley discussed his gender identity.

“I have been battling with my gender identity and sexuality. I am Christian, so this isn’t allowed. I want to live a life of serving God, but how can I with these and other sins in the way. [I know] I am forgiven for my sins. But it’s still a lot of pressure and it’s hard to maintain a good Christian mindset 24/7,” the killer wrote.

Police note another screenshot which implies that Teasley may have been depressed, reading, “when I see a beautiful woman and I’m a man.” When Teasley was asked by investigators if he had planned Heike’s murder, they responded, “I’m telling you, if I was gonna do something like that, it definitely wouldn’t be premeditated.”

Detectives discovered that Teasley had been fired from his job for being “aggressive toward female employees” and for being suspected of stealing products.

During the course of the investigation into Heike’s murder, law enforcement also found that Teasley had knowingly received child pornography in 2019 or 2020. He pleaded guilty to one count of sexual exploitation of a minor for possessing child pornography.

Teasley’s attorneys referred to their client with feminine pronouns in the courtroom. The convicted killer has criminal charges dating back to 2020, and just five months before the slaying, he had been released after serving a three-year jail sentence for armed robbery.

According to a plea deal reached in court last Friday, Teasley will be sentenced to life in prison for first-degree murder. By pleading guilty, prosecutors agreed to dismiss their notice to seek the death penalty. The judge also said that the charges in an assault and burglary case, filed after Teasley’s arrest for Heike’s murder, would also be dismissed under the terms of the agreement.

In August 2024, aggravated assault and burglary charges were filed against Teasley for a January 2020 attack against another woman. The case also involved a knife, but the victim survived.

The Heike family issued an emotional statement supporting the court’s decision.

“After 3½ incredibly long and painful years, our family supports the State’s decision to enter into a plea agreement in Lauren’s case,” the statement read. “This means we will not have to endure a trial or sit in a courtroom and hear every painful detail of the crime that took Lauren from us. There is a tremendous sense of relief in knowing that we will be spared that additional trauma.”

The family continued: “We fully supported the State’s efforts to seek the death penalty, but we are in agreement with the plea offer made by the defendant. He offered to plead guilty to first degree murder and accept a natural life sentence,” the statement continued. “While no sentence will ever bring Lauren back, we are relieved knowing that he will never be released. He will never again have the opportunity to harm another person or cause another family to experience the unimaginable grief and trauma that ours has endured.”

According to the LGBTQ+ Bar Association, the state of Arizona allows trans-identified male convicts to be transferred into a women’s correctional facility. Inmates are initially processed on the basis of sex, but accommodation requests may be granted after undergoing a review conducted by a Transgender/Intersex Committee appointed by the state’s Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry (ADCRR).

The ADCRR’s Order 810, “Management of LGBTI Inmates,” implemented on April 1, 2022, states: “Inmates identified as transgender or intersex shall be asked and afforded the opportunity to voluntarily provide the following information: The appropriate personal pronouns for their gender identity; their own view of how they would be most safely housed, including female versus male housing.”


Reduxx is your source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% independent! Support our mission by making a donation.

Man Arrested After Sexually Assaulting Women In “Inclusive” Planet Fitness Locker Room

A 40-year-old man has been arrested after being accused of sexually assaulting two women inside a Planet Fitness women’s locker room in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Laquan Holland was arrested on Thursday morning after police responded to a report of an assault in progress at the gym in Porter Square.

According to reports, Holland, who was a member at the gym, entered the women’s locker room where he sexually assaulted a woman and prevented her from leaving the area. Holland then attacked a second woman after she attempted to intervene to save the first victim.

Holland faces two counts of assault to rape, two counts of indecent assault and battery on a person over 14, and one count each of kidnapping and witness intimidation. He pleaded not guilty at his arraignment on Friday and was ordered held pending a hearing scheduled for later this month.

Holland was known to police, with court records showing that he had previously pleaded guilty to two counts of child rape and one count of indecent assault and battery on a child under 14 in 2006.

Planet Fitness has said that Holland’s membership has since been cancelled. The franchise group said it was working with police on the investigation. The club is located in a building owned by Lesley University, which clarified that no students or staff were involved.

The incident has brought renewed attention to the fitness franchise’s notably lenient policies with respect to locker room access.

According to its website, all members may use the locker rooms, bathrooms, showers, and any other facilities/programs “based on their self-reported gender identity,” a guideline that many have argued has contributed to other disturbing incidents in the women’s areas at multiple Planet Fitness locations across the United States.

In September of 2023, a strikingly similar incident occurred at a Planet Fitness in Monroe, Georgia.

As Reduxx reported, JaKorbie Dixon, 25, was arrested after allegedly exposing himself to a 15-year-old girl and a 19-year-old female employee in the women’s locker room of a Planet Fitness. The girl’s aunt said Dixon pulled back the shower curtain, stood naked in front of her young niece, and called after her to stay as she tried to leave.

When the family complained, staff allegedly acknowledged previous reports about Dixon, but said he had a right to use the women’s locker room under the gym’s gender self-identification policy. The family’s attorney said Dixon was allowed to continue using the women’s facilities because he “identified” as female. The same report described two separate incidents involving the employee: Dixon allegedly summoned her to the women’s locker room while naked, then exposed himself to her again weeks before the girl’s encounter.

In May of 2026, a New Hampshire woman lost her Planet Fitness membership after she complained about a male in the women’s locker room.

Judy Walcott said she spotted the man hanging his belongings outside a shower and told the front desk the encounter made her uncomfortable, but a staff member said there was nothing he could do due to Planet Fitness inclusivity policies.

When she raised it again, a second employee called her transphobic and told her to leave. The club later cancelled her membership of more than a decade. Walcott said an employee submitted the cancellation request in her name, marked “Nondiscrimination Trans,” and forged her signature. She later returned to use her paid membership, and staff called police; she received a no-trespass order.

The man was later identified as Christopher Beaulieu, a registered sex offender. Court records reviewed by Reduxx showed Beaulieu began transitioning while serving a prison sentence for sexually assaulting a child aged 13 to 16.

He later received feminizing hormones and changed his legal name to “Crystal.” He was later convicted of failing to keep authorities informed of identity changes required by his sex-offender registration.


Reduxx is your source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% independent! Support our mission by making a donation.

CANADA: Transgender Pedophile Back In Prison After Being Found In Possession Of Images of Infants While On Parole

A Canadian trans-identified male sex offender who was twice convicted on charges related to child sex abuse material, one of which involved accessing pornography of infants in diapers, is once again in custody after violating conditions of his parole. Laverne Travis Waskahat has repeatedly been released by the Parole Board of Canada, which has considered his “Indigenous status” as a mitigating factor in his repeat offending.

Waskahat, who claims to be transgender and also uses the name ‘Lauren,’ has an extensive history of possessing, making and publishing child pornography involving male and female infants under three years old. Waskahat had also previously committed sexual offenses against children in his care and was known to take voyeuristic photos of infants in public, primarily in bathrooms at malls and grocery stores around Edmonton, Alberta.

Waskahat has been ordered by the court to register as a sex offender for life. But since 2013, he has been released and re-arrested a staggering seven times after being found in violation of the terms of his Long Term Supervision Order (LTSO), according to new information from a recent Parole Board decision.

Waskahat was first convicted of possessing and distributing child pornography in 2011, for which he received a five-year prison sentence. Authorities discovered images of Waskahat performing sexual acts on an infant. Over the next fifteen years, he would become known to Edmonton Police for sexually abusing children while in a position of care, including babysitting, and taking voyeuristic photographs of infants in public.

Canada’s federal correctional system permits statutory release after an offender has served the legislated portion of a federal sentence, subject to supervision and conditions. In December 2013, Corrections Services Canada (CSC) released him into the community under supervision. Within less than a week, he was arrested again after he was found to have been stockpiling baby diapers.

While it is unclear when the Parole Board approved his release, his parole was suspended the following year, in August 2014, after he incurred new criminal charges relating to the production and possession of child pornography.

Waskahat was set free again in August 2019. At the time Edmonton police warned the public about Waskahat. They said he was a threat to commit “significant harm to the community and will commit another sexual offence against a child under the age of 16.” On October 17 of that year, he was spotted by Edmonton police officers using a cellphone in violation of his release conditions. He was arrested, and his devices were seized. Forensic investigations uncovered child pornography images, and Canadian media reported that an “Alberta woman” had plead guilty to three charges related to child pornography, just weeks after Edmonton police warned he would likely re-offend.

In addition to child pornography, investigators noted that there were also a number of photos of diapers and diaper fetish search terms in the laptop’s search history. Other search terms included things like “abuse baby,” “abuse newborn” and “newborn hit.”

In April 2021, Waskahat was arrested after he was discovered to be accessing child pornography online. An investigation revealed 631 images of a variety of sexual assaults on young children, and “written narratives depicting child sexual abuse were also found,” according to court records. Waskahat was additionally accessing messaging apps targeted at children.

On December 11, 2023, Waskahat was released to the community despite Edmonton Police Service being aware of his risk to the public. Just prior to freeing the sexual predator, they issued public statements advising the community to beware of Waskahat. They stated that there were “reasonable grounds to believe [he] is of significant harm to the community” and is at risk of committing a sexual offense against a child under the age of 16.

Just two days later, on December 13, Waskahat was found in possession of child pornography. In a media statement, Edmonton Police revealed they had received a tip that traced Waskahat to a hotel room in the city’s West Side. At the time of his arrest, police found a baby crib, diapers, dozens of alleged pornographic drawings and a laptop in Waskahat’s room.

The following year, in January 2024, CSC released Waskahat into the community while placed on electronic monitoring. By the following week, Waskahat’s parole supervisor was informed that he had been gathering “baby items” at the community-based residential facility where he was placed. A search of his room uncovered “explicit written material depicting child sexual abuse”, and he was again arrested, returned to custody, and charged with breach of LTSO on February 24.

While remanded and awaiting charges, Waskahat’s parole officer was informed by the remand center that the pedophile had been hoarding sexually explicit material in his cell. On May 29, Waskahat was sentenced to an additional year, which amounted to 252 days after credit for time served.

In the Parole Board’s decision, it was noted that “there was a publication ban imposed by the court in relation to one of the current convictions,” indicating that the full extent of Waskahat’s crimes has been hidden from the public.

According to the most recent Psychological Report on file, dated September 27, 2023, Waskahat has demonstrated “deviant sexual interests including diaperism, infantilism, sexual sadism, and pedophilia,” and his likelihood of re-offending was placed in the “well-above” risk category. The assessment concluded that the risk Waskahat poses to the community “would not be manageable in the foreseeable future.”

The psychological assessment noted that Waskahat had consistently produced “creative writing depicting violent, sexual acts towards children,” and that he had “demonstrated predatory intent and a lack of self-control,” which raised “significant concerns regarding the potential for serious harm against a child.”

In November 2024, Waskahat was again released to a community-based residential facility. Within days, he was “quickly found” with photos of babies, cribs, and pregnant women, and was arrested. He was placed in custody after the Parole Board subsequently revoked his release.

Then, after being released at his warrant expiry date on February 5, 2025, he was arrested again on February 19, 2025, just fourteen days later for breaching his long-term supervision order. In a decision made during a September 3, 2026 hearing, the Parole Board says Waskahat was found with a smartphone which “contained a search history relating to infant related sexual assault”.

The Parole Board has again ordered Waskahat to detention for the next two years. According to the decision, Waskahat “admitted to watching and manufacturing child pornography continuously” and that his sexual preference involves “the sexualization of infants and diapers”.

The document reveals that at the time of Waskahat’s 2021 conviction, the Judge considered as a mitigating factor his “Indigenous status” and the impact serving a prison sentence would have on him.

“You are Indigenous and identify as female,” reads the September 3 Parole Board decision. “You are a treaty member of your First Nation community where you were raised by foster parents after spending your first four months in hospital due to being underdeveloped at birth and abuse. Your biological parents were involved in substance abuse, and you have been diagnosed with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) due to same which has impacted your cognitive functioning and general functioning in the community.”

The Parole Board went on to detail his prolonged use of alcohol and marijuana, which led to a psychotic episode requiring hospitalization at around the age of 30. It further reveals that Waskahat has “had relationships with both men and women” and reports having five children with whom he no longer has contact.

“The Board has considered the file information, your submissions at the hearing as well as your social history as an offender of Indigenous heritage. The Board acknowledges the overrepresentation of Indigenous people within the criminal justice system and that this disproportionate representation is connected to marginalization and systemic racism,” reads the decision.

According to the decision summary, Waskahat claimed to have sexually abused children due to feeling oppressed about his “gender identity”, and that having access to child pornography prevents him from committing homicide.

“At your hearing, you spoke to your upbringing and how you did not feel loved which you connect to writing your written child sexual abuse stories where you are both the child and the adult abusing the child. You connect this to your upbringing but were not clear as to this connection. You also spoke to it being difficult to be transgender in the world and how people laugh at you. You report that this leads to feelings of violence on your part which you grapple with and use child sexual abuse related materials to make you feel better so that you don’t have to kill anyone.”

The Parole Board decision describes how Waskahat has, again, been repeatedly found with written child sexual abuse materials, assaulted a CSC officer, and been found in possession of magazine cut outs of infants and child-related items.

In May 2026, Waskahat completed the Indigenous Sex Offender High Intensity Program, but correctional officials characterized his participation as “largely superficial”. Program facilitators said his “responsivity needs” may have limited his ability to benefit from the treatment. Throughout the program, officials said Waskahat expressed views that justified his offending, denied that his actions caused harm, and placed responsibility on others. Facilitators concluded that he continued to hold beliefs that supported and normalized his offending, demonstrated limited empathy for victims, and externalized blame. The Parole Board said the programming appeared to have had limited impact on his risk.

The Parole Board said Waskahat had repeatedly characterized the material he produced as “victimless” and harmless, despite participating in correctional programming and other interventions. According to the Board, he continued to externalize blame and demonstrated little empathy for victims. The Board said his repeated return to offenses involving child sexual abuse indicated that he had made little progress in understanding the harm caused by his actions. It also noted that Waskahat appeared to believe his written depictions of child sexual abuse did not harm others. During his hearing, he said he intended to continue writing such material daily, despite knowing it was illegal.


Reduxx is your source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% independent! Support our mission by making a donation.

EXCLUSIVE: Former WPATH President Linked to Multiple Pro-Pedophilia Academics and Activists Over Several Decades, Previously Advocated for Sex Offender Rights

Reduxx can reveal that a leading figure behind the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), an organization which promotes the medical ‘transitioning’ of children, has a long history of working with pro-pedophile academics. Eli Coleman, a former WPATH president who oversaw and influenced the Standards of Care for transgender medical protocols for decades, has professional ties to multiple academics who either defended or advocated favorably for adult-child sexual relations, and had himself previously drafted Standards of Care for sex offenders.

Coleman is an American sexologist, professor emeritus, and former director of the Eli Coleman Institute for Sexual and Gender Health (previously the Program in Human Sexuality) in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at the University of Minnesota — where WPATH was previously based for several years. Coleman was an instrumental figure in the development of WPATH Standards of Care (SOC), specifically contributing to the three most recent iterations: the sixth, seventh, and eighth editions.

Significantly, Coleman served as the Chair and Lead Author for the development of the Standards of Care 8, which recommended the validation of a “eunuch gender identity”, and would later be revised to remove specific age limitations on the prescription of puberty-halting drugs to children.

On December 3, 2021, WPATH released draft guidelines which included, for the first time, the category of ‘eunuch’ as a protected “gender identity.” WPATH’s SOC 8 recommends medical treatment and services for those with a self-declared gender identity, and describes the relationship between “eunuch-identified people and other transgender people.”

The document states, “Eunuch-identified people may share with other gender-diverse people a desire for reduction or elimination of masculine physical features, masculine genitals, or genital functioning.”

It also goes on to claim that “eunuch-identified people may suffer the same minority stress as other stigmatized groups,” and refers extensively to research collected from a hardcore fetish site called the Eunuch Archive — a site that features child sexual exploitation fantasies centered around stopping little boys from going through puberty, as well as erotic stories about sexually abusing children.

Through a series of investigative reports, Reduxx revealed that the Eunuch Archive, the forum sourced by WPATH, was co-founded by a man who would be convicted and sentenced to 15 years in prison for his involvement in a pedophile ring. Thomas Pidel was linked to over a dozen individuals who had subscriptions with a Belarus-based child pornography enterprise which sold thousands of paid memberships internationally to access child sexual abuse content.

Pidel, who described himself as a “boy lover,” was active in multiple Usenet groups dedicated to pedophilia activism and castration fetishism in the years just before his arrest in 2004. Some of the groups Pidel was active in during this time were alt.support.boy-lovers, alt.fan.prettyboy, and alt.eunuchs.questions, the latter of which would become the Eunuch Archive.

The most popular stories in the Eunuch Archive depict the forcible castration of children, and, as previously revealed by Reduxx, of the approximately 10,000 pornographic stories on the site, over one-third involved minors.

Three academics identified exclusively by Reduxx as having played a foundational role in the Eunuch Archive gathered opinions from anonymous forum members which were published as research. The leading figure behind this work, Professor Emeritus Thomas W. Johnson, presented research they co-authored together at a 2009 conference in Oslo held by WPATH.

In May 2010, the contents of the Oslo presentation were published in The International Journal of Transgenderism, an academic journal issued by WPATH. Johnson was again invited to speak at a 2011 WPATH conference in Atlanta, Georgia. It was during this conference that the decision was made to de-classify Gender Identity Disorder as a psychological condition. In its place, Gender Dysphoria would become the recommended terminology.

In the private, members-only area of the Eunuch Archive forum accessed by Reduxx, Johnson could be seen claiming he worked with Eli Coleman, and was personally invited to contribute to the development of the SOC 8.

In 2016, Johnson claimed to have been specifically chosen to rewrite a portion of the Standards of Care by former WPATH president Eli Coleman, who “pointed at me and announced that I was expected to provide input on eunuchs for the revision. Now is our opportunity to help devise the standards of care that will be most helpful.”

For nearly twenty years, the Eunuch Archive has hosted an annual “Meeting of Members.” The event has typically been held in Minneapolis, Minnesota, where former WPATH president Eli Coleman has lived and worked for decades.

But the disturbing connections between Coleman and pedophile-adjacent academics does not end there. By purchasing archival records from a California-based university library, Reduxx learned that Coleman sought approval for his WPATH leadership position from a fellow sexologist, Vern Bullough, who had direct professional contact with a founding figure behind the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), an organization which advocated for adult male homosexual relationships with children.

For years Bullough, himself a founding member of the organization which would become WPATH — The Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association (HBIGDA), kept a formal correspondence with a founding member of NAMBLA, and the group’s attorney: Lawrence Stanley.

In July 1987, Stanley wrote to Bullough imploring him to read and consider his article “The Hysteria over Child Pornography and Pedophilia,” which was soon published in Paidika: The Journal of Pedophilia and Playboy. In an introductory letter, Stanley told Bullough: “With respect to sizeable collections of child pornography, it is my impression that the Kinsey Institute’s is larger than the Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality.”

Stanley’s article, “The Hysteria over Child Pornography and Pedophilia,” argued that law enforcement officers engage in deliberate entrapment schemes. “Under the guise of ‘protecting children,’ millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent to investigate and prosecute would-be consumers of child pornography, many of them individuals who do not pose any immediate danger to children.”

Bullough replied in a letter dated January 1988, congratulating Stanley on the publication of his article. “As far as collections of movies of child porn, the San Francisco Institute is much larger, simply because the major distributors of porn films in the United States, particularly child porn, got rid of incriminating evidence by donating it to the Institute in San Francisco.”

In a follow-up letter the next month, Bullough suggested: “If you get good duplicates of material and don’t know where to send them, I would like to add to my collection, most of which is now in the California State University, Northridge, library.”

In September 1989, Stanley was found in possession of hundreds of child pornography publications, as well as five videotapes, which he had kept locked in a safe under his bed. As the court proceedings were underway in 1991, Bullough submitted a character testimonial in favor of Stanley, calling him a “knowledgeable professional in the field of human sexuality,” and that he would “strongly vouch for his character and integrity.”

Bullough wrote: “I have known Lawrence Stanley for four or five years and worked closely with him for part of that time in publishing a newsletter for the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex.”

Bullough, who was influential during the formative years of WPATH, would also go on to publish the academic journal Paidika: The Journal of Pedophilia, which advocated for sexual relationships between adults and children.

Coleman and Bullough frequently contributed to the same sexology texts and compiled volumes throughout the 1980s and 1990s. Both served alongside each other on editorial and advisory boards for peer-reviewed academic journals in sexology, including the Journal of Sex Research.

When Bullough passed away in 2006, his obituary, published by the Los Angeles Times, was penned by former WPATH president Eli Coleman.

“It would be very hard to find somebody that had so extensively studied so many areas within sexuality,” Coleman said. “Vern was all over the field — not in a superficial way but in a very deep way.”

Prior to working with WPATH on the Transgender Standards of Care, Coleman had also previously devised Sex Offender Standards of Care and advocated for the rights of sexual criminals and men with paraphilias, or sexual pathologies, including pedophilia.

During the late 1980s and 1990s, while directing the Program in Human Sexuality at the University of Minnesota, Coleman co-authored and led the development of clinical treatment standards for adult sex offenders, and published an initial proposed set of clinical guidelines in the Journal of Offender Rehabilitation.

Coleman partnered with a nun belonging to the Catholic organization Sisters of Mercy in order to promote medical treatments for sex offenders. In 1990, Eli Coleman and Sister Margretta Dwyer authored “Proposed Standards of Care for the Treatment of Adult Sex Offenders”, which was published in the Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. The document was subsequently approved by the United Nations as aligning with its Sustainable Development Goal 16, “Peace.”

“From puberty through adulthood, males more than females experience erotic fantasies and dreams of a paraphilic type. A paraphilia is a condition of compulsive response to, or dependence upon, an unusual and unacceptable stimulus in the imagery of fantasy, for optimal initiation and maintenance of sexual arousal, and the facilitation or attainment of orgasm,” write Coleman and Dwyer.

“Various ‘appropriate care’ philosophies have been suggested by many professionals who have identified themselves as experts on the topic of sex offenders,” the paper continues. “Although some standards exist, until the present, no statement of the ‘Standards of Care’ to be offered to the sex offender has received official sanction by any identified viable professional group.”

Coleman led the first International Conference on the Treatment of Sexual Offenders (ICTSO) in 1989 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. This event was followed by two further conferences in the same city in 1991 and 1993. The fourth conference, in 1995, was held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

As the founding organizer of the ICTSO series, Coleman co-chaired and organized the Amsterdam meeting alongside European hosts. In that role, he would have had significant influence over who was invited to participate in the meeting.

At the inaugural First International Conference on the Treatment of Sexual Offenders in Minneapolis, Coleman invited a Norwegian psychologist and sexologist with deep connections to multinational pro-pedophilia advocacy, including the now-disbanded Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) of England.

Thore Langfeldt was among the international participants invited by Eli Coleman and the Program in Human Sexuality at the University of Minnesota to the first conference, which served as the initial gathering to build an international network of clinicians and set the groundwork for the collaborative drafting of the Standards of Care for the Treatment of Adult Sex Offenders. He also attended and spoke at the subsequent three conferences organized by Coleman.

Thore Langfeldt has written extensively about “child sexuality” and positively conveyed case studies of pedophilic relationships throughout the 1970s and 80’s. His academic publications sought to portray adult-child sexual contact as normal and non-pathological.

Previously a schoolteacher, Langfeldt was involved with the Norwegian pro-pedophile organization called the Pedophile Working Group (Pedofil Arbeidsgruppe – NAFP) in the 1970’s. The NAFP was established at the University of Oslo in 1975, where the group had registered a post office box – and where Langfeldt was specializing in psychology. That year, Langfeldt wrote a letter to the Ministry of Justice requesting an alteration to the criminal code which would lower the legal age of consent from 16 to 14 years old.

The NAFP directly invited the leader of the Paedophile Information Exchange to speak at a panel event in Oslo, the Amnesty for Love and Affection conference, at the Hotel Viking in June of 1979.

While attending the inaugral ICTSO, having been invited by Coleman, Langfeldt argued that sex offenders can be identified in childhood, and that some boys, even as young as toddlers, have an urge to castrate themselves. “We have known that these children have existed for a long time, but people working at the kindergarten level have refused to acknowledge the existence of sexuality in children,” Langfeldt said.

Following his participation in the Minneapolis and Amsterdam meetings, Langfeldt joined Eli Coleman as a co-author and reviewer of the subsequent revisions of the Standards of Care for the Treatment of Adult Sex Offenders.

However, Coleman’s professional relationship with Langfeldt did not end there. In 2009, Langfeldt organized a WPATH conference in Oslo — the same conference attended by academic representatives of the pedophilic forum the Eunuch Archive, who claim to have been invited directly by Coleman himself to contribute to WPATH Standards of Care.

On June 18 of that year, Langfeldt presented on the topic of “The Child in the Discourse of Transsexualism.” According to the abstract, Langfeldt’s lecture used “cases from the shemale movements and pornography to question the medical discourse and its power in forming the child into a suitable medical diagnosis.”

The ICTSO series, of which both Coleman and Langfeldt are charter members, was rebranded during the fifth international conference. The International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders (IATSO) was formally founded on March 24, 1998, formalizing the ongoing international conference series that Eli Coleman and his colleagues had initiated in Minneapolis in 1989.

Langfeldt was selected by the IATSO Scientific Committee to deliver a headline plenary address in the conference’s main hall on Friday, August 29, 2025, titled “The history and current state of our understanding of pedophilia.” During his presentation, Langfeldt argued that minor-directed attractions should be evaluated as a disorder requiring treatment.

Similarly, the Norwegian psychologist served as the Scientific Conference President for the 11th International IATSO Conference, which was held in Oslo, Norway, from September 1–4, 2010. Just months before, in June, the Sexual Offender Treatment, IATSO’s official academic journal, published Langfeldt’s article: Is “Pedophilia” a Useful or a Confusing Concept? An Empirical Study on Sexual Abuse of Children, Sexual Orientation and Typology: Implications for Therapy.

Protocols devised by Coleman to treat sex offenders included the recommended usage of anti-androgens, sometimes referred to as chemical castration when used in a punitive sense. For decades, Coleman has written about the treatment of pedophilia with pharmacological management alongside cognitive therapy.

As clinical options evolved, Coleman, alongside fellow researchers, have reviewed the efficacy of more recently-developed GnRH agonists, such as Lupron, which lower testosterone levels to castrate men with pedophilic tendencies.

After devising Standards of Care for the treatment of pedophiles, Coleman’s work shifted towards Standards of Care for WPATH, or “transgender health,” which advise clinicians to administer castrating drug Lupron to children. Protocols published by WPATH recommending the medical “transitioning” of children through the use of drugs which halt puberty have since been implemented internationally, and in 2022, the transgender health authority removed specific minimum age requirements for puberty-blocking drugs such as Lupron, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries that were present in previous drafts.

Early versions of the WPATH Standards of Care, and specifically revisions 1 through 5, published between 1979 and 1998, explicitly listed the administrative contact address as: Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association, Program in Human Sexuality, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.

Coleman’s personal academic office at the University of Minnesota served as the official publicly listed mailing headquarters for WPATH for years. This exact suite housed the University’s Program in Human Sexuality, now renamed the Eli Coleman Institute for Sexual and Gender Health, where Coleman served as director and professor emeritus.


Reduxx is your source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% independent! Support our mission by making a donation.

Transgender Pedophile Serving 40-Year Sentence For Sexually Abusing Multiple Children Files Lawsuit Seeking Surgery, Transfer to Women’s Prison In Alaska

A transgender pedophile serving a 40-year sentence for sexually abusing multiple children for over a decade is demanding the state of Alaska pay for genital surgery and allow him to transfer to a women’s prison. While incarcerated, Emmanuel Cancel legally changed his name to Emalee Rain Wagoner, and in 2016, he began claiming to identify as a woman.

Cancel was arrested and charged with child sexual abuse in June 2011 after one victim came forward. Shortly after, two others told investigators they had also been raped and abused. In January 2015, Cancel pleaded guilty to three counts of sexual abuse of a minor. Authorities had initially charged him with 50 counts of child sexual abuse, though after Cancel agreed to plead guilty, prosecutors consolidated them. Cancel was convicted for raping and sexually abusing two of his stepchildren and the daughter of a family friend over a period of approximately ten years, and sentenced to 60 years, with 20 years suspended and 40 years in prison.

Cancel changed his name to Emalee Wagoner in 2016, and, according to court documents which refer to him using feminine pronouns, “changed her external presentation by growing out her hair, changing her name, wearing improvised makeup, and otherwise presenting as female to the extent possible in prison.”

The Alaska Department of Corrections (AKDOC) has denied a formal request filed by Reduxx for access to a recent booking photo.

Photo of Emmanuel Cancel provided by the state sex offender registry. The DOC declined to provide Reduxx an inmate file photo.

Cancel was a father to four biological children and two stepchildren. According to court documents, from 1998 until 2007 he sexually abused at least three of the children by “walking around the house naked; fondling the children; requiring that they perform oral sex on [him]; and digital and penile penetration… The abuse was pervasive and devastating to the children.”

Superior Court Judge Eric Smith said the case was among the worst he had ever seen in his career.

“I keep a log of all the cases I have and all the sentences I do,” he said. “It helps me remember cases. I would put Mr. Cancel’s case in terms of the sheer horror of what he did (to the victims) with only two or three other cases that I have seen.”

A reply filed by attorneys representing the AKDOC and prison officials refers to Cancel using his new legal name of Wagoner. The response states that he threatened the children into silence and forced them into serious drug use.

Disturbingly. the sex offender “attempted to keep the children quiet by threatening to kill them if they told anyone about the abuse.” Cancel would tell the children stories of alleged murders he had committed, and detailed how he would dispose of their bodies. The children were further terrified into silence as Cancel frequently physically abused them as well.

According to court records: “… The children thought this threat was legitimate due to the level of violence Wagoner displayed in the household, including slamming the children’s heads against the wall, whipping them with a belt, and beating their mother. She also provided them with marijuana, cocaine, crack, and meth as a bribe to keep them quiet,” states the defense’s reply, again using feminine pronouns to refer to the sadistic offender.

Cancel, who had been detained for the sexual offenses in 2011, was ultimately sentenced to 40 years’ imprisonment with 20 years suspended, on charges relating to the sexual abuse of minors. The earliest projected parole date was set for 2038.

After legally changing his name to Emalee Wagoner in 2016, Emmanuel Cancel attempted to cut his genitals in an act of self-harm. The defense argues that the incident occurred after Cancel had communicated his intention to self-mutilate to his fiancé.

“In August 2016, she attempted self-surgery. Initially, she claimed that it was an accident. Later, she changed her story and claimed that she was attempting a gender-affirming surgery. On one other occasion, Wagoner re-injured her penis which required elevated medical attention at Mat-Su Regional Medical Center,” the defense attorneys remarked.

“Starting in August 2016, she started to communicate with her then-alleged fiancé that she was contemplating attempting to perform a self-surgery by cutting off her penis and genitals. It appears that the motivation for this was either to be released from prison or to be transferred to a women’s prison.”

Counsel for prison officials noted that leading up to his self-harm, Cancel could be heard in a recording with his then-alleged fiancé explicitly stating that his motivation for claiming to identify as a woman was to secure a transfer to a female prison, where he believed he could be together with the unnamed woman.

“If things change – and I do [the self-surgery] and get moved over, will you come see me?,” Cancel said. In another recording, Wagoner stated as follows: “[The self-surgery is] the only way I can see us being together otherwise its 22 more years will tear us apart. Six years have already destroyed us. It’s the only way I see it happening… So, if I get [the self-surgery] done, you will come live with me?”

Cancel’s now ex-fiancé, who was not an inmate, ended the relationship shortly after he performed a self-inflicted injury to his penis, which is consistently referred to by the court in ongoing proceedings as “her penis.”

In 2017, the AKDOC recognized a diagnosis of gender dysphoria for Cancel, which was described as co-occurring with diagnoses of borderline personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder. At the beginning of 2018, Cancel submitted a request form for prosthetic breasts, an item which is typically considered a fetish object. As such, AKDOC denied his request on the grounds that it did not serve a medical purpose.

In September 2018, Cancel lodged a civil rights complaint alleging Eighth Amendment violations of “cruel and unusual punishment” over having not been provided with genital surgery on the taxpayer dime. Wagoner’s claim sought damages of $5 million, declaratory relief, and injunctive relief, citing repeated denials of feminizing hormones and surgery. The convicted pedophile requested a trial by jury and has continuously demanded the Alaska Department of Corrections (AKDOC) adhere to guidelines published by the controversial lobby group the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH).

Curiously, evidence provided to the court by AKDOC reveals that almost immediately after his arrest on dozens of charges related to raping children, Cancel filed a formal complaint alleging that his life was in danger at Palmer Correctional Center. “Due to publicity of charges against me, I’m requesting protective custody. Due to life threats [sic] from a list of people… You can call my fiancé, she has the list.”

In August 2022, the sex offender was prescribed feminizing hormones by Dr. Rachel Samuelson, while the state provided him with cosmetics and “female undergarments” at taxpayers’ expense.

Cancel’s multiple requests for genital surgery were formally denied in October 2023 by the AKDOC’s Medicaid Advisory Committee (MAC), which found that he did not meet the diagnostic criteria required to deem genital surgery as a medical intervention.

In September 2023, Cancel filed a request for Voice Feminization Therapy, and the following year, July 2024, his request was denied by Jill Cronin, Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) on the basis that Voice Feminization Therapy is not considered essential healthcare.

In 2024 to 2025, the ACLU of Alaska and Lambda Legal began to represent Cancel in court proceedings. The legal team argues that the AKDOC acted with deliberate indifference to Cancel’s “gender dysphoria” by withholding “medically necessary care”, which they claim violates his Eighth Amendment rights. The foundation for their argument rests on Standards of Care published by trans activist lobby group, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) — an organization steeped in controversy which is currently being sued by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for fraud and deceptive practices.

Counsel for the convicted pedophile is seeking an injunction against AKDOC’s de facto policy against approving genital surgeries for inmates, and asserts that AKDOC maintains an implicit, unconstitutional blanket ban on “gender-affirming surgeries”.

AKDOC’s attorneys argue that Cancel is already being adequately managed through hormones and counseling, and is enjoying the use of “female undergarments” and cosmetics. They maintain that since starting on hormones in 2022, he has been objectively stable, showing no self-harm or suicidal ideation. The defense asserts that providing hormones, such as estradiol and anti-androgen spironolactone, alongside mental health support and ongoing monitoring, demonstrates active care, defeating any claim of intentional neglect or deliberate indifference.

Despite this, following a trial in May 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska ruled in favor of Cancel and entered a permanent injunction that ordered the Alaska Department of Corrections (AKDOC) to provide him with a “vaginoplasty,” or the construction of a wound intended to resemble and function as a labia and vagina. According to a 2025 Must Read Alaska report, while some legal precedents exist for giving trans-identified inmates “gender affirming” surgery, Cancel’s case will test those boundaries further.

One such precedent involves another convicted child rapist, Adree Edmo, formerly known as Mason Edmo. Edmo first launched a lawsuit against the state of Idaho and the state department of correction’s medical provider, Corizon Correctional Healthcare, in 2017 after being denied “gender” surgeries. In 2018, U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill ruled that Edmo was at risk of “irreparable harm” without the surgery, and ordered the state to pay for it.

The state of Alaska has appealed the district court’s decision on Cancel’s “gender affirming” surgeries, and the case is currently pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals.


Reduxx is your source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% independent! Support our mission by making a donation.