Home Blog Page 198

Trans r/AntiWork Moderator Admitted to “Serial Rape” Allegations

Allegations and admissions have surfaced suggesting the now-infamous moderator of r/AntiWork has a history of sexual assault.

On January 25, Doreen Ford came to international notoriety after a disastrous interview on a Fox News program hosted by Jesse Watters. Ford was invited to speak on behalf of r/AntiWork, a subreddit which advertises itself as being dedicated to labor reforms for exploited working class people.

The subreddit has experienced exponential growth since the beginning of the pandemic, skyrocketing from just a few hundred thousand to over 1.6 million members over the course of the last year, and has become the center of much controversy in various political circles.

Ford, a biological male who identifies as non-binary and transgender, has been the longest serving moderator of the subreddit. Despite widespread subreddit member concerns about moderators giving media appearances, Ford represented r/AntiWork on Watters’ show in what was largely considered an “embarrassing” spectacle for the subreddit as Ford appeared disheveled, unprepared, and uneducated about the subjects discussed.

But since Ford’s name and face have come to widespread attention, internet sleuths have begun to dig up disturbing details about his history.

In a series of old Facebook posts made by Ford that are now making the rounds across social media, the Reddit moderator states he is aware of serial rape accusations against him, and appears to admit to multiple instances of sexual impropriety and abuse against at least two different people.

In the first, Ford states that one person accusing him of rape had been intoxicated but allegedly told him that “it wasn’t a big deal” if they engaged in sexual activity anyway. Ford states that he “took them at their word” and had sex with the individual despite their inebriated state, taking them to be “consenting.” The person later would then accuse him of sexual assault, to which Ford responds that he will be “more responsible in the future when it comes to alcohol.”

In a second Facebook post, Ford says he had been in an ongoing relationship with a person who had a history of trauma which caused “emotional and physical distance” between them. Ford writes that as a result, his sexual needs were “going unmet.” He goes on to say that because of his lack of sexual access, he began chronically masturbating as a coping mechanism.

“After months of trying to keep myself in check, I began sporadically masturbating while they slept next to me,” he writes in the undated Facebook post, noting that the individual made it clear that they were uncomfortable with the situation, but that he continued despite the warnings. At one point, Ford put his sleeping partner’s hand on his genitals.

Later in the post, Ford says his partner installed alarms to try and prevent them from falling asleep in the same room, but that he actively shut the alarms off out of a “desperation for emotional intimacy.”

The individual in question apparently requested financial assistance from Ford in order to help pay for their therapy costs, but Ford says that they “decided against it” after considering his economic status, noting that he instead donated to a charity dedicated to helping people in “alternative but abusive relationships.”

Beyond the Facebook posts, an October 2020 entry on the site of Anarchist think tank Center for a Stateless Society notes that Ford, who also goes by the name Doreen de Cleyre, was ousted from their organization after being “exposed as a rapist.”

Since appearing on Watters’ show, r/AntiWork has since locked down and gone private, limiting its visibility to the public. Just prior to that, Ford was caught banning people for misgendering him.

According to Ford’s interview with Watters, he works part-time as a self-employed dog walker.


Reduxx is a new, independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re able to continue our work exposing predators and reporting the truth thanks to the generous support of our readers.

Prostasia’s Goal Is to Normalize Pedophilia

For many, charitable status is a legitimizing factor taken into consideration when choosing what organization or foundation to donate to. Government recognition that an entity’s work is valid enough to exempt them from taxes is often a good indicator of the work’s importance.
However, there are always exceptions.

California-based charity Prostasia is one such deviation to the rule, the organization having been given IRS tax exemption in 2018. While marketing itself as a children’s rights organization, Prostasia is a veritable grab-bag of causes surrounding sex and sexuality, but there is plenty of evidence to demonstrate that the real story is not so simple.In Prostasia’s blog entries, “child protection” routinely ends up in the same sentences as “free speech,” “kink,” or “sex positivity.” The topics of age play, furries, hentai, and prostitution are spoken about no differently as, and often with no barrier between, child sexuality and child sexual abuse.

It is here, in the not-so-hidden depths of Prostasia’s pet causes, where it begins to mutate into something far more malicious, deviating very heavily from its veneer of supporting child safeguarding. In fact, protecting children from exposure to sex abuse seems to not just be at the very bottom of Prostasia’s to-do list, it is almost antithetical to its entire existence.Prostasia sees the threat pedophiles pose to children as a bogeyman dreamed up by the alt-right, while condemning anti-pedophile sentiment as harmful “Nazi-like” rhetoric which requires mass censorship across social media.

The organization’s efforts have dedicated themselves to crusades against child pornography bans, letter-writing campaigns to state representatives demanding child-likeness sex dolls be kept legal, and funding research into “fantasy sexual outlets” for pedophiles.

Once these threads quickly unravel, Prostasia’s goals and underlying purpose becomes increasingly clear. Despite its attempts to role play as a mere progressive activist organization, all of Prostasia’s goals and campaigns lead to the exact same conclusion: The total normalization and acceptance of pedophilia in wider society.

Prostasia hosts a forum in which members are invited to start conversations on anything they wish without stigmatization. In many cases, the subject returns to the “liberation” of MAPs – or, Minor Attracted People – a more socially acceptable way to refer to pedophiles. Most of the pro-pedophilia discussion happens in the forum’s dedicated Sex Positivity section.

Recently, Prostasia began collaborating with an organization it calls the MAP Support Club, an unregistered group which claims to provide “peer support” for pedophiles, and invites “minor attracted people” aged 13 years old and up to participate in online chats about “minor attraction.”

In an attempt to give itself legitimacy, Prostasia employs a wide variety of pseudo-scientific jargon and quack references which they utilize as justification for their positions. But in almost no cases do these assertions find themselves very widely shared amongst academics or experts which do not have a relationship with pro-pedophilia movements or statements.It repeatedly claims there is evidence to support that pedophilia is “comparable to a sexual orientation,” while citing Toronto psychiatrist Dr. James Cantor, who is infamous for his Tweets demanding the inclusion of pedophiles in the LGBT spectrum.

Cantor is a member of the Prostasia team.

In another one of its campaigns, one focused on arguing against the necessity of the sex offender registry, it provided multiple articles written by another one of its then-staff, Guy Hamilton-Smith.
Hamilton-Smith, a lawyer in the state of Kentucky, wrote several times for the Prostasia blog that measures to keep registered sex offenders away from children, such as school-zone bans, were ineffective and unnecessary.

A quick search in the publicly available database of registered sex offenders found that Guy Hamilton-Smith was registered after being caught with child sexual exploitation material.

Most recently, writer Noah Berlatsky was taken in as a director at Prostasia. Berlatsky previously came under fire for writing an article published in New Republic under the title “Child Sex Worker’s Biggest Threat: The Police” in which he lamented the treatment of “children engaged in survival sex” by police officers. While fighting corruption within the justice system is certainly a valid issue, at no point did Berlatsky note the obvious fact that children cannot consent to sexual activity of any kind, instead spending his article suggesting that children forced into prostitution were willing participants in an oppressed, but legitimate, trade.

In 2017, Berlatsky tweeted “pedophiles are essentially a stigmatized group.”It is not just in its narratives where Prostasia acts unlike any other charitable activist organization, but also in its behavior. Prostasia founder Jeremy Malcolm has been known to directly and personally attack those who take any issue with his organization’s campaigns.Family lawyer and feminist activist Sarah Phillimore was vocal in sharing her experience with Malcolm, who sent her threatening emails after she discovered that yet another member of their (now ex-) staff, Jeff White, was on the sex offender registry for criminal sexual conduct with a child under the age of 13.

This author was also subject to disturbing, erratic behavior from Malcolm after calling his organization into question in 2019. Malcolm insisted I was a racist neo-nazi sympathizer, and republished photos of me as a young child with abusive captions.

Ultimately, Prostasia is no normal 503c charity, and its attempts to gain legitimacy and forward their agenda into the mainstream should not just be rejected, but actively fought against. Any individuals associated with the organization in any way should have their motivations called into question, because there is simply too much information on the group’s activities and history available out there for any excuses of good-faith ignorance to be believable.

Protecting children from sexual abuse is an important and righteous cause. But, like the vast majority of us, I’m under the impression it can be done without coddling pedophiles and their sympathizers.


Reduxx is a newly-launched, independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re able to continue our work exposing predators, standing up for women, and reporting the truth thanks to the generous support of our readers.

Trans-Identified Male Creating Fictional “Sissy” Child Porn

A man who identifies as transgender and goes by the aliases “Spokane Sissy”and “Veronica Vayne” is appropriating photos of children from social media to create fetish content.

Glen Broyles, aged 68, of Spokane, Washington, announced that he identifies as transgender in a 2016 Facebook post.

“As most of you may know, I am in the transgender [community] and transitioning. I feel it is time to leave this Facebook profile in my past and my Facebook profile is now under the name of Veronica Glenne Broyles.”

In 2017, Broyles announced that he had legally changed his name and gender marker on official identification:

“As of 1:30PM on February 16, 2017, according to the State of Washington I am legally named Veronica Glenne Broyles. Less than an hour later I had my legal gender changed on my ID. I also contacted Social Security and advised them of my name change. Now that I have [a] legal ID in my purse verifying that I am legally a woman named Veronica, my next major undertaking is to change all my other accounts and services to my legal name.”

Broyles runs several social media accounts and websites where he posts pornography and fetish content, including “sissy captions” featuring children. Sissy captions are photos, typically of women, girls, or crossdressing males, accompanied by text that sexualizes the concept of a male being forced to transition to a female and are a subgenre of the “forced feminization” pornography category.

Captions involving children can be seen on Broyles’ Youtube channel, Spokane Sissy. One such example is the video titled, “Crossdressing Brother Becomes Girlfriend.” Several photos of children feature prominently in the video, which describes incestual sex acts performed by minors.

Corey Maison, a boy who became known for a viral video wherein he declared himself to be a girl at the age of 14, is featured alongside text that reads:

“As an eleven year-old girl, I developed a fondness for sucking c*ck… As a girl of eleven being girly to me meant flirting with cute boys and sucking c*ck… but the boy I liked the most slept in the bedroom next to mine — my oldest brother.”

This theme recurs in another video called “Veronica Learns Why It Is Better To Be A Girl,” which repeats the narrative of an eleven year-old girl who is sexually assaulted by a 14 year-old boy.

A range of other disturbing video content has been uploaded by Broyles to his YouTube channel. “Truth and My Early Years as a Sissy” depicts a series of photographs of children, some of young boys whose faces have been photoshopped onto the bodies of young girls in dresses.

An AI bot narrates, “What is the truth? When I speak of truth, I can only speak to what I know to be true. So it is better to ask, ‘What is my truth?’ When grown-ups told me I was a girl, I accepted their authority. I wanted nothing more than to always be a girl.”

One of Broyles’ most popular uploads, titled “Upskirt View Of Sister’s Panties Excites Crossdressing Brother” has nearly a million views and is a clip from the 1980 Italian porn flick called Le segrete esperienze di Luca e Fanny. In the clip, a young man dresses up in lingerie and pleasures himself. In a slideshow presentation created by Broyles, 20 Keys to Your Ultimate Crossdressing Experience, he states: “It must be a 24-7 totally feminine experience. Your ultimate crossdressing experience is all about total immersionin a feminine life, fully embracing your feminine desires. It will take you out of your home and into a public world… [it] should be a self-affirming experience.”

Broyles’ Twitter bio states: “I am a 67-year-old sissy on a journey to become a 68-year-old woman — translation ‘I want to lose the c*ck and acquire the feminine upgrade.’”

A tweet from October 3, with a link to a video montage of cheerleaders performing, reads, “When I was in high school, I truly wanted to be a cheerleader. I even snuck into the girl’s locker room on several occasions and tried on the uniform for the school.”

Broyles also recently created a website called “Spokane Sissy: My Last Chance to Live as a Whore.” Currently, most posts are dated November 8, and some categories have yet to be completed.

Despite this, Broyles has listed menu items where he presumably intends to add content. Examples of page titles listed under “My Sissy Bio” include: “Sissy as Toddler,” “Sissy as Craigslist Whore,” and “Sissy as Transgender Woman.” The menu option “Who Am I?” contains the page titles, “Beta Male” and “Submissive.” Other categories which Broyles has created, but not completed, include types of pornographic and BDSM fetish material under the options “Whore Trainers” and “My Training Videos.”

A post to Broyles’ website dated November 19, called “Getting Laid NYE 2021” reads:

“After forty years — I turn sixty-nine in June of 2022 — will I finally achieve my lifelong dream of living life as a woman? Now when I say ‘living my life as a woman,’ I would be more correct to ask ‘Will 2022 be the year I know the life of a sissy whore?’ If I am to be a sissy whore in 2022, it makes sense to begin that life on NYE. Instead of being kissed at the stroke of midnight, would it not be better to be earning my first $300 as a sissy whore getting f*cked [by] a man with a big c*ck?

I spent my weekends going out to club en femme and telling myself the lie that life as a closet crossdresser was enough for me. It was not. With the birth of the internet, I came to learn that there were males like me who identified as women. I began to self identify as a transgender woman. I am not a transgender woman. I know that now.”

Broyles goes on to say that he “yearns” to be a “whore” and that “as a teenager, as his girlfriend, I had lots (and lots) of sex with my older brother.”

Broyles’ declaration that he is “not a transgender woman,” however, is a direct contradiction from the narrative he is pushing publicly on his personal Facebook account, where he announced that he is indeed identifying as transgender and has changed his sex marker on his identification documents.

“I began transition three years ago and yet I am still on many levels struggling with an identity that for so many years of myself I had kept hidden. I applaud the courage so many young people have today to fully embrace their gender identity,” Broyles wrote in a 2017 blog post on Medium.

Broyles is far from an outlier. There are boundless blogs and sites dedicated to the proliferation of “forced feminization” pornography which promise to transform men into objectified parodies of women, even going so far as to command the viewer to undergo plastic surgery and take hormones. There are forums where men encourage each other to act out their fetish in public, or advise each other that their actions are symptomatic of having a female “gender identity.” There are also a vast amount of “sissy captions” encouraging men to dress up in feminine clothing and which eroticize the ingestion of estrogen. A significant amount of these captioned images feature children and sexualize the concept of medically transitioning children — at times, by force or coercion.

Such men are being emboldened to live out their fetishes in public and are being granted access to spaces where women and children are vulnerable or in various states of undress, and are lobbying in favor of laws which allow for medical experimentation on children. The social construct of the transgender child is little more than a projection, dreamed up by men with paraphilic disorders to normalize their own sexual fantasies.


Reduxx is a newly-launched, independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re able to continue our work exposing predators and reporting the truth thanks to the generous support of our readers.

Un pederasta se convierte en un galardonado activista de los derechos trans.

Un delincuente sexual infantil convicto está realizando actividades de divulgación comunitaria para una organización que asesora a hombres encarcelados sobre cómo declararse transgénero y cambiar legalmente su identificación.

Xena Grandichelli, nacido Jeffrey Willsea, es un hombre biológico que ahora se identifica como mujer. En 1994, Grandichelli se declaró culpable de 11 cargos de abuso sexual a una niña de 3 años y fue declarado delincuente sexualmente violento. Su ficha de delincuente sexual lo clasifica como un nivel de riesgo 3, lo que indica un mayor riesgo de reincidencia y una amenaza para la seguridad pública. La ley del estado de Nueva York estipula que los delincuentes sexuales de nivel 3 no pueden acercarse  a más de 300 metros de una escuela.

Sin embargo, desde su puesta en libertad, Grandichelli se ha convertido en un activista trans de gran prestigio y ha hablado en universidades importantes. En 2017, fue panelista y presentó “las experiencias de encarcelamiento de las mujeres” en la Universidad de Columbia. En 2016, Grandichelli habló en la Universidad de Nueva York sobre el tema del encarcelamiento y el trauma. En el mismo año, dirigió un taller sobre temas trans para la Conferencia Nacional de Salud de Lesbianas, Gays, Bisexuales y Personas Transgénero de Color.

En particular, también se ha asociado con el Proyecto de Ley Sylvia Rivera (SRLP) y fue designado como miembro del Equipo de Construcción de Movimientos. En una carta publicada en el sitio web de SRLP, Grandichelli describe cómo los miembros del equipo de la organización trabajaron activamente para reclutarlo cuando aún estaba en la cárcel por abusar sexualmente de un menor.

El SRLP es notorio por pasar por alto los crímenes de los hombres violentos que reclaman una condición transgénero. Por ejemplo, en 2014, el SRLP lanzó una petición para presionar al Departamento de Correcciones y Supervisión Comunitaria (DOCCS) de Nueva York para que saque al violador y asesino de niños Synthia China Blast de confinamiento solitario.

Blast, cuyo nombre de nacimiento es Luis Morales, violó repetidamente y torturó brutalmente a Ebony Nicole Williams, una niña de 13 años de Harlem. Según la investigadora Diana Shaw, “el Sr. Blast, de 22 años, vestido con una falda, llevó y se deshizo del cuerpo mutilado de la niña en un paso subterráneo del Bronx, y prendió fuego al cuerpo”, luego procedió a jactarse del asesinato a sus amigos.

Al abogar en nombre de Blast, el SRLP declaró: “[Él] quiere prepararse para [su] audiencia de libertad condicional en cuatro años al obtener [su] GED (diploma que reciben los estudiantes al acabar el instituto) y completar otros programas que lo ayudarán a curarse el trauma de [su] infancia y [su] tiempo en prisión”. El actor que se dice trans Laverne Cox, que habla como representante del SRLP, publicó un video en el que leyó en voz alta una carta de Blast que lo describía  bajo una luz favorable.

Al enterarse de la naturaleza brutal de los crímenes de Blast, Cox respondió:“No estaba al tanto de los cargos por los que [él] fue condenado. Si hubiera estado al tanto de esos cargos, nunca habría aceptado leer la carta”. Sin embargo, la información relacionada con los crímenes de Blast no hubiera estado fácilmente disponible, debido a su cambio de nombre, ya que los informes de los medios y los documentos judiciales de la época se referían a él como Luis Morales.

A pesar de esto, los recursos incluidos en el sitio web de SRLP proporcionan orientación explícita sobre el proceso de cambiar el nombre legal y la identificación: “Acerca de los motivos de tu solicitud, di lo que quieras que el juez sepa sobre por qué deseas un cambio de nombre. No tienes que compartirlo todo… Bajo la ley, las personas trans no están obligadas a mostrar evidencia médica de nuestras transiciones para cambiar nuestros nombres. La mayoría de las veces, los jueces siguen correctamente la ley”.

Al igual que con Synthia China Blast, el crimen del representante de SRLP Grandichelli ha sido tapado por su autoproclamado estado transgénero. Al reclamar una identidad femenina, a Grandichelli se le ha prestado el podio de dos de las universidades más prestigiosas de la nación, y en 2017, recibió un premio al Héroe de la Comunidad por parte del Proyecto Antiviolencia.

En 2021, el Women & Justice Project, una organización que presiona por los derechos de las mujeres encarceladas, presentó una cita de Grandichelli en su sitio web: “[Yo] rompo a llorar cuando trato de explicarle a alguien lo que es estar en una prisión estatal o en Rikers Island y ser golpeado físicamente hasta acabar medio muerto y violado, y misgenerizado y abusado tanto que quieres quitarte la vida”.

El Proyecto Mujeres y Justicia presenta unas estadísticas espeluznantes junto con las palabras de Grandichelli, y dice que las personas trans en prisión son agredidas sexualmente diez veces más a menudo que la población carcelaria general. La cifra de agresión sexual entre la población carcelaria general presentada para la comparación proviene de una de las estimaciones más bajas disponibles, y no tiene en cuenta el abuso sexual denunciado por las reclusas.

Las cifras exactas rara vez se comprueban, y las mujeres que son violadas o abusadas por funcionarios de prisiones masculinos a menudo no denuncian la agresión por temor a su seguridad. Sin embargo, algunas estimaciones sugieren que hasta una de cada cuatro mujeres estadounidenses experimenta violencia sexual cuando está encarcelada. Los hombres son los agresores en el 98% de las agresiones sexuales cometidas por el personal de la cárcel sobre las reclusas.


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes! Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon.

John Money: el pervertido a favor de la pedofilia que inventó el “género”

La “identidad de género” es un tema candente hoy en día y se ha convertido en un punto focal no solo del discurso social, sino también de la política y el procedimiento legal. Pero pocas personas conocen los alarmantes orígenes del concepto.

El Dr. John Money, sexólogo y psicólogo de Nueva Zelanda que ejerció en Johns Hopkins, es considerado el primero en acuñar los términos “identidad de género” y “rol de género”, describiendo la “experiencia interna de la sexualidad” y las “expectativas sociales del comportamiento masculino y femenino” respectivamente. Estos conceptos ocupan un lugar destacado en el activismo trans de hoy en día, y se utilizan para reforzar las afirmaciones de “fluidez de género”.

Pero la historia de Money es oscura y polémica, y sus detalles a menudo se ignoran cuando se discute su contribución a la popularización del discursos de “género vs. sexo”.

Al igual que muchos sexólogos, Money creía que la pedofilia era una sexualidad inofensiva que, cuando se practicaba “adecuadamente”, llevaba al niño a no sufrir ningún daño. De hecho, las teorías de Money sobre la pedofilia eran tan comprensivas que, hasta el día de hoy, su trabajo ocupa un lugar destacado en el sitio web de la Asociación Norteamericana de Amor Hombre-Niño (NAMBLA), uno de los grupos de derechos pederastas más antiguos.

En la década de 1990, Money incluso apareció  en entrevistas con Paidika, una revista de psicología pedófila que lleva el nombre del adjetivo griego para “aniñado”, y que ha sido utilizada por activistas de los derechos de los pedófilos para referirse al miembro más joven de una relación pederasta.

En una entrevista de 1991 para la revista, Money dice:

“Si tuviera que ver el caso de un niño de diez u once años que se siente intensamente atraído eróticamente hacia un hombre de unos veinte o treinta años, si la relación es totalmente mutua y el vínculo es de verdad totalmente mutuo, de ninguna manera lo llamaría patológico”.

Money también señaló que “nunca” denunció a ningún pedófilo a la policía, incluso a aquellos que abusaban activamente de niños debido a su creencia de que el sexo entre adultos y niños era normal y “a menudo beneficioso”.

Pero los puntos de vista de Money sobre la pedofilia apenas tocan las facetas más oscuras y depravadas de su historia, que están reservadas para el caso de David (nacido Bruce) Reimer.

Nacido en Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canadá en 1965, Reimer fue víctima de una circuncisión médica chapucera cuando tenía 6 meses de edad. El procedimiento buscaba abordar un problema de orina que Reimer tenía, pero en su lugar le dejó el pene mutilado sin posibilidad de arreglo.

Los padres de Reimer lo llevaron a Baltimore para ver a Money en 1967, preocupados por sus futuras perspectivas sexuales y románticas. En aquel momento, Money era conocido por su investigación con personas intersexuales, y era considerado un pionero de la reasignación de género. Money recomendó que Reimer fuera sometido a una reconstrucción genital para crear una vulva, y les dijo a sus padres que criarlo como si fuera una niña sería lo mejor para él. Estaba convencido de que el “género” podía ser socialmente aprendido, y Reimer era el sujeto ideal a través del cual probar sus teorías debido a que tenía un hermano gemelo, Brian, que podría usarse como control masculino.

En su primera infancia, a Reimer nunca se le dijo que había nacido varón, y fue sometido a terapia hormonal desde el principio para llevarlo a una pubertad femenina. Reimer fue visto regularmente por Money, quien siguió su progreso en un esfuerzo por demostrar su teoría de que el género era maleable.

Durante las revisiones, Money sometía a los gemelos a experimentos perturbadores. Se vieron obligados a replicar las relaciones sexuales entre sí, tocarse e inspeccionar los genitales del otro y ver pornografía. Money les enseñaba a los gemelos fotos de revistas obscena y fotos sexuales “explícitas” de niños. Luego los preguntaba sobre su excitación sexual y cuestionaba sus atracciones. También se esperaba que los niños hicieran todo eso frente a audiencias de hasta otros 6 adultos, y algunos informes indican que Money también tomó fotos y videos de los niños participando en actividades sexuales ensayadas. Por aquel entonces, los gemelos tenían solo 6 años.

El testimonio posterior de uno de los gemelos declaró que la personalidad de Money tenía “dos lados”: uno cuando sus padres estaban presentes y otro cuando estaban solos. Cuando estaba a solas con los niños, Money era abusivo y se enojaba con ellos por negarse a actuar para él. En una declaración posterior, ambos recuerdan que temía que los “azotara” si no hacían lo que les pedía y se quitaran la ropa.

A medida que David Reimer se hacía mayor, se volvía cada vez más reticente a ver Money, hasta pedirle a sus padres que no lo obligaran a ir a Baltimore para las revisiones. A pesar de las hormonas feminizantes y las operaciones, Reimer se identificaba como un hombre y se negaba a creer que era una niña, aunque nunca le habían dicho que había nacido un niño, una refutación catastrófica de las teorías de Money sobre el género.

A la edad de 14 años, Reimer tuvo ideas suicidas y se negó a tener más contacto con Money. Le pidió la verdad a sus padres, y sus padres se la dijeron en 1980.

A pesar de eso, Money procedió a declarar que sus experimentos eran un éxito, y sus “hallazgos” se utilizaron en estudios posteriores para justificar las cirugías genitales impuestas a algunos niños intersexuales con genitales ambiguos.

Both Reimer y su hermano se suicidaron, Brian por sobredosis de drogas en 2002 después de librar una batalla durante toda su vida con la esquizofrenia, y David disparándose en la cabeza en 2004 a la edad de 38 años. Sus padres dijeron que atribuían la muerte de sus hijos al trauma transmitido por los métodos de Money.

A pesar de los inquietantes orígenes, el legado de Money sigue vivo en el concepto de “género” como un elemento único y cuantificable aparte del sexo. También vive en la existencia de clínicas de identidad de género, la primera de las cuales fue establecida por Money en Johns Hopkins en 1965.

Si bien los defensores de la ideología trans a veces se apropian indebidamente de los experimentos abusivos de Money sobre Reimer como “prueba” de que una persona no puede ser forzada a vivir como un “género” que no es el suyo, pasan por alto la realidad crítica de que la experiencia de Reimer demuestra que una persona no puede ser algo que no es, y punto.

Ni la cantidad de hormonas femeninas, ropa, operaciones ni la sexualización hicieron que David Reimer actuara o pensara de manera diferente a su propio yo masculino observado. Incluso una pubertad feminizada sintética y mal concebida no cambió a David Reimer. A Reimer le pusieron delante todos los accesorios de otra “identidad de género” desde los primeros momentos de su vida cuando era un bebé y aún así era un hombre, una refutación total de las demandas de los activistas de género de que los “niños trans” reciban productos químicos lo antes posible para obtener resultados de transición más “exitosos”.

De hecho, los resultados de un estudio de 30 años de duración realizado en Suecia también confirman este hecho. Realizado por seis distinguidos investigadores del Instituto Karolinska, el estudio encontró que las “mujeres trans” demostraron patrones masculinos de comportamiento criminal que persistieron incluso después de una transición médica y quirúrgica completa. También encontró que las intervenciones quirúrgicas de género no supusieron ninguna diferencia en las tasas de suicidio de los pacientes transgénero.

Estos resultados han sido ignorados en gran medida por los activistas trans, que continúan insistiendo en que un hombre que se inyecta estrógeno y usa vestidos ya no es un hombre, y no “piensa” o “actúa” como un hombre. Es aquí, frente a una falta total de evidencia, donde el activismo trans adquiere sus cualidades religiosas y comienza a referirse a cerebros y almas con géneros mágicos, cuya solución parece ser un terapeuta y un exorcista, respectivamente.

John Money era un pervertido. Era un abusador de niños. Era un simpatizante pedófilo, si no un pedófilo. Y si un movimiento encuentra sus orígenes en un hombre como John Money, es hora de que ese movimiento haga un examen de conciencia (de género).

Traducción cortesía de Salagre.


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes! Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon

Toddler Rapist Now Award-Winning Trans Rights Activist

A convicted child sex offender is performing community outreach for an organization that advises incarcerated men on how to declare a transgender status and legally change their identification.

Xena Grandichelli, born Jeffrey Willsea, is a biological male who now identifies as a woman. In 1994, Grandichelli pleaded guilty to 11 counts of sexual abuse involving a 3 year-old girl and was designated a sexually violent offender. His sex offender registration categorizes him as a risk level 3, which denotes the highest recidivist risk and a threat to public safety. New York State law restricts level 3 sex offenders from being within 1,000 feet of a school.

Yet since his release from prison, Grandichelli has become a highly-regarded trans activist and has spoken at top-tier universities. In 2017, he was a panelist representing “women’s experiences of incarceration” at Columbia University. In 2016, Grandichelli spoke at NYU on the topic of incarceration and trauma. In the same year, he led a workshop on trans issues for the National Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People of Color Health Conference.

Notably, he has also partnered with the Sylvia Rivera Law Project (SRLP) and was designated as a Movement Building Team member. In a letter posted to the SRLP website, Grandichelli describes how team members from the organization actively worked to recruit him while he was still incarcerated for sexually abusing a child.

The SRLP has a pattern of overlooking the crimes of violent men who claim a transgender status. For instance, in 2014, the SRLP launched a petition to pressure New York’s Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) to remove child rapist and killer Synthia China Blast from isolated confinement.

Blast, whose birth name is Luis Morales, repeatedly raped and brutally tortured Ebony Nicole Williams, a 13-year-old girl from Harlem. According to researcher Diana Shaw, “While he was dressed in a skirt, 22-year-old Mr. Blast carried and disposed of the young girl’s mutilated body in a Bronx underpass, and set the body on fire,” then proceeded to brag about the killing to friends.

When advocating on behalf of Blast, the SRLP stated: “[He] wants to prepare for [his] parole board hearing in four years by obtaining [his] GED and to complete other programs that will help [him] to heal from the trauma of [his] childhood and [his] time in prison.” Trans-identified male actor Laverne Cox, speaking as a representative for the SRLP, released a video in which he read aloud a letter from Blast portraying him in a sympathetic light.

Upon learning of the brutal nature of Blast’s crimes, Cox responded, “I was not aware of the charges for which [he] was convicted. If I had been aware of those charges, I would have never agreed to read the letter.” Yet information pertaining to Blast’s crimes would not have been readily available, owing to his name change, as media reports and court documents from the time period referred to him as Luis Morales.

Despite this, resources included on the SRLP website provide explicit guidance on the process of changing one’s legal name and identification, stating, “For the grounds of your application, say whatever you want the judge to know about why you want a name change. You don’t have to share everything… Under the law, trans people are not required to show medical evidence of our transitions to change our names. Most of the time, judges correctly follow the law.”

As with Synthia China Blast, SRLP representative Grandichelli’s crime has been obscured by his self-declared transgender status. By claiming a female identity, Grandichelli has been afforded a platform by two of the most prestigious universities in the nation, and in 2017, he was presented with a Community Hero award by the Anti-Violence Project.


Reduxx is a newly-launched, independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re able to continue our work exposing predators and reporting the truth thanks to the generous support of our readers.

Disabled Woman Arrested, Interrogated Over Domestic Violence Stickers

Twitter users are outraged today after it was revealed that a disabled woman was arrested by Gwent Police in South Wales for posting stickers related to domestic violence and women’s rights.

On January 24, Twitter user @quetiapina1 posted that she had been subjected to police detention and interrogation after being reported for committing a hate crime. The woman, who lives in the Newport area in Wales, says police had been called after she was declared a “threat to the [trans] community” due to stickers and posters she had put up in her area.

The user says she was arrested in a way painful to her splinted arm and brought to the Newport Central Station by Gwent Police, who kept her in a cell and seized her watch and phone. While detained, her house was searched and a number of stickers and posters were seized by police. She notes that none of them mentioned transgender people or directly referenced trans issues, and were more generally about women’s rights.

The woman, who is disabled and requires medication, says she was interrogated around 1:30 a.m while being denied her prescriptions. She says she was released at 3:30 a.m without her phone or any transportation, and was left to navigate a very steep hill in the city centre with her mobility scooter.

“I am on [bail]. Conditional in that I don’t do stickering and postering in all of Newport,” she concluded, stating that she is allowed to do leafletting and she will continue to do so out of passion for her causes.

In her thread, @quetiapina1 posted one example of a trans activist complaining about a poster she’d put in the area — one which stated quite simply “No Men in Women’s Prisons” on a stylistic background. But some others she’d made have since emerged, with one set of stickers in particular simply declaring a statistic on domestic violence. These stickers were also allegedly branded as transphobic hate speech.

Many social media users responded to the horrifying story in a similar way, asking Gwent Police through their Newport account whether or not they had any “real crime” to solve. As it turns out, Gwent Police should have plenty.

According to recent data acquired through a Freedom of Information request, over 580 rapes were reported to Gwent Police last year, but only 5 charges were made and over 430 are still “under investigation.”

In April of 2021, Gwent Police made national headlines after allegedly informing a woman who tried to report a sexual assault that she hadn’t been raped, telling her “you can’t be pressured into sex.”

Similarly in November, Gwent Police were forced to apologize to female officers who attempted to report a senior male colleague’s abusive behaviour towards them. The man, Clarke Joslyn, was forced to resign in 2019, but had subjected women on the force to a campaign of terror for almost a decade, using his position of power over young female trainees to groom and intimidate them into relationships. One woman was pinned against a wall and had a knife pulled on her by Joslyn, who threatened another woman if she ever “humiliated” him. Higher-ups at Gwent Police effectively ignored the women’s reports and calls for help, and failed to act on Joslyn’s behaviour.

Reduxx is a newly-launched, independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re able to continue our work exposing predators and reporting the truth thanks to the generous support of our readers.

Support Us on Patreon!

John Money: The Pro-Pedophile Pervert Who Invented “Gender”

“Gender identity” is a hot-topic today and has become a focal point of not just social discourse, but legal policy and procedure. But few people know the concept’s disturbing origins.

Dr. John Money, a sexologist and psychologist from New Zealand who practiced at Johns Hopkins, is considered the first to coin the terms “gender identity” and “gender role,” describing the “internal experience of sexuality” and the “social expectations of male and female behavior” respectively. These concepts are prominently featured in trans activism today, and are used to bolster claims of “gender fluidity.”

But Money’s history is a dark and controversial one, the details of which are often neglected when discussing his contribution to the popularization of “gender vs. sex” discourses.

Like many sexologists, Money believed pedophilia was a harmless sexuality which, when practiced “properly,” led to the child suffering no harm. In fact, Money’s theories on pedophilia were so sympathetic that, to this day, his work is prominently featured on the website of the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA)– one of the longest-established pederast rights groups.
In the 1990s, Money allowed himself to be featured in interviews with Paidika, a pedophile psychology journal named after the Greek adjective for “boyish,” and has been used by pedophile rights activists to refer to the younger partner in a pederastic relationship.

In a 1991 interview for the journal, Money is quoted as saying:

“If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who’s intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual, then I would not call it pathological in any way.”

Money also noted that he “never” reported any pedophiles to police, even those who were actively abusing children due to his belief that adult-child sex was normal and “often beneficial.”

But Money’s views on pedophilia hardly touch the darkest and most depraved facets of his history, those being reserved for the case of David (born Bruce) Reimer.

Born in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada in 1965, Reimer was the victim of a botched medical circumcision when he was 6 months old. The procedure sought to address a urination problem Reimer was experiencing, but instead left his penis mutilated beyond repair.

Reimer’s parents took him to Baltimore to see Money in 1967, concerned about his future sexual and romantic prospects. At the time, Money was known for his research with intersex people, and was considered a pioneer of gender reassignment. Money recommended Reimer be subjected to a genital reconstruction to create a vulva, and suggested to his parents that raising him as a girl would be in his best interests. He was convinced that “gender” could be socially learned, and Reimer provided an ideal subject through which to test his theories due to having a twin brother, Brian, that could be used as a male control.

Throughout his early childhood, Reimer was never told he was born a male, and he was subjected to hormone therapy early on in order to lead him through a female puberty. Reimer was regularly seen by Money, who tracked his progress in an effort to demonstrate his theory that gender was malleable.

During check-ups, Money would subject the twin boys to disturbing experiments. They were forced to replicate sexual intercourse with each other, touch and inspect each other’s genitals, and watch pornography. Money would show the twins photos from smut magazines and “explicit” sexual photos of kids. He would then prod them about their sexual arousal, and question their attractions. The children were also expected to comply in front of audiences of as many as 6 other adults, and some reports state Money also took photos and videos of the children engaged in rehearsed sexual activity. At the time, both of the twins were just 6 years old.

Later testimony from one of the twins stated that Money had “two sides” to his personality — one when their parents were around, and one when they were alone. When alone with the children, Money was abusive and got irate with them for refusing to perform for him. In a later statement, they both recall fearing he would “whup” them if they did not do as he asked and strip their clothes.

As David Reimer aged, he became increasingly resistant to seeing Money, and begged his parents not to force him to go to Baltimore for check-ups. Despite feminizing hormones and surgery, Reimer identified as a male and refused to believe he was a girl though he had never been told he was born a boy — a catastrophic rebuttal of Money’s theories on gender.

By the age of 14, Reimer was experiencing suicidal ideations and refused any further contact with Money. He demanded the truth from his parents, which they eventually told him in 1980.

Despite that, Money proceeded to declare his experiments a success, and his “findings” were used in later studies to justify genital surgeries imposed on some intersex children with ambiguous genitalia.

Both Reimer and his brother would take their own lives, with Brian committing suicide via drug overdose in 2002 after a life-long battle with schizophrenia, and David shooting himself in the head in 2004 at the age of 38. Their parents stated that they attributed their son’s deaths to the trauma imparted upon them from Money’s methods.

Despite the disturbing origins, Money’s legacy lives on in the concept of “gender” as a unique and quantifiable element apart from sex. It also lives on in the existence of gender identity clinics, the first of which was established by Money at Johns Hopkins in 1965.

While proponents of trans ideology sometimes misappropriate Money’s abusive experiments on Reimer as “proof” that a person cannot be forced to live as a “gender” they are not — they gloss over the critical reality that Reimer’s experience demonstrates a person cannot be something they are not, full stop.

No amount of female hormones, clothes, surgery, or sexualization made David Reimer act or think any differently than his very male self promulgated. Even a synthetic, half-cocked feminized puberty did not change David Reimer. Reimer was introduced to the bells and whistles of another “gender identity” from the earliest moments of his life as an infant and was still a male — a total refutation of gender activist demands that “trans kids” be provided chemical interventions as early as possible for more “successful” transition outcomes.

In fact, the results of a 30 year-long study conducted in Sweden also confirm this fact. Performed by six distinguished researchers from the Karolinska Institute, the study found that “transwomen” demonstrated male patterns of criminal behaviour which persisted even after a full medical and surgical transition. It also found that surgical gender interventions did not make any difference in the suicide rates of transgender patients.

These results have largely been disregarded by trans activists, who continue to insist that a man who injects himself with estrogen and wears dresses is no longer a man, and does not “think” or “act” like a man. It is here — in the face of a total lack of evidence — where trans activism then takes on its religious qualities, and begins deferring to magical gendered brains and souls, the solution to which seems to be a therapist and an exorcist, respectively.

John Money was a pervert. He was a child abuser. He was a pedophile sympathizer, if not a pedophile himself. And if a movement finds its origins in a man like John Money, it is time for that movement to do some (gendered) soul searching.


Reduxx is a newly-launched, independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re able to continue our work exposing predators and reporting the truth thanks to the generous support of our readers.

Teachers Convinced Child to Identify as Transgender: Lawsuit

A mother has filed a legal case against a California school district claiming teachers secretly persuaded her then-11-year-old daughter to change her gender identity and name.

Jessica Konen said two middle school teachers at Spreckels Union School District who ran an Equality Club — later renamed to UBU (You Be You) — suggested to her daughter that she was bisexual in 6th grade, and then subsequently manipulated her into believing that she was transgender.

Spreckels Union School District was responsible for “extreme and outrageous conduct” that placed the girl on a path toward medical transition and incited conflict between the mother and her child, according to the claim filed Wednesday by conservative group The Center for American Liberty (CAL).

Konen had not known her daughter had begun identifying as a boy and using a male name until she was called to a meeting at the Buena Vista Middle School principal’s office in December 2019. At the time, her daughter was in 7th grade.

Konen was also not informed of the reason for the meeting until her daughter entered the room and her teacher, Lori Caldeira, broke the news.

“I literally was caught off guard. I was blindsided,” Konen said. “I didn’t even know what to feel like because I didn’t even know where it came from.”

Konen said she began to cry, and that her daughter was also taken by surprise. The girl had notified teachers that she wanted to tell her mother about her decision, but had not been made aware of the meeting until she was called to attend.

Konen said her daughter began returning to her “old self” when schools implemented remote learning during March 2020, and now uses her given name.

However, Konen had not questioned how her daughter was being influenced by staff and teachers until Abigail Shrier published the contents of a leaked recording of a California Teachers Association conference.

In the recording, her daughter’s teacher Lori Caldeira and another teacher named Kelly Baraki were discussing their tactics for keeping UBU meetings private and described how they “stalked” students to recruit.

“When we were doing our virtual learning — we totally stalked what they were doing on Google, when they weren’t doing school work,” Baraki said. “One of them was googling ‘Trans Day of Visibility.’ And we’re like, ‘Check.’ We’re going to invite that kid when we get back on campus.”

After their comments were made public, Caldeira told the San Francisco Chronicle the quotes were misrepresented and that the “stalking” comment was intended as a joke.

In the lawsuit, the two teachers were accused of keeping club UBU, along with its policies and roster, hidden from parents.

“Ms. Caldiera and Ms. Baraki: (1) instructed students that they should not tell their parents about their new LGBT+ identities and expression; (2) failed to keep Equality Club rosters or records so that parents could not discover their children’s participation in the club or new LGBT+ identities through a review of school records; and (3) held Equality Club meetings during lunch—as opposed to after school—so that students, who were too young to drive, could better hide their participation in the club and their new LGBT+ identities and expression from their parents,” claims the lawsuit.

The legal claim alleges that the school put a “Parental Secrecy Policy” into place. According to the document, “Under the Parental Secrecy Policy, Buena Vista teachers and staff would keep secret from parents that their children had articulated confusion about their gender identity, evinced a desire to change their gender identity, or assumed or expressed a new gender identity, unless the student expressly authorized the parents to be informed.”

The suit also alleges deliberate infliction of emotional distress against the student, known only as A.G, and the mother:

“Respondents’ acts have driven a wedge between Ms. Konen and her daughter, sending the message to A.G. that her mother cannot be trusted and does not support her. By cutting Ms. Konen out of the decision-making process for A.G. on matters relating to her gender expression and identity, Ms. Konen and A.G. have both suffered and are continuing to suffer severe emotional distress, mental anguish, psychological damage, and damage to their family dynamic of such a substantial or enduring quality that no reasonable person in a civilized society should be expected to endure it and reasonable people would be unable adequately to cope with it.”

Teachers Caldeira and Baraki were placed on administrative leave in November. The school district has hired a professional law firm to investigate, which is ongoing, and the UBU club has been suspended.

In December of 2021, Konen went viral after a video recording of her tearing into the school board at a district meeting was published on the internet.

In the recording, Konen is audibly upset, and asserts that her daughter almost “lost her life” because of the emotional manipulation of the teachers and the damage it did to her self-perception.


Reduxx is a newly-launched, independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re able to continue our work exposing predators and reporting the truth thanks to the generous support of our readers.

Mother Sues Meta, Snap Over Suicide of 11-Year-Old Daughter

Meta Platforms Inc. and Snap Inc. are responsible for the suicide of an 11-year-old girl who suffered from depression after becoming addicted to Instagram and Snapchat, according to a lawsuit filed by the girl’s mother.

The woman claims her daughter Selena Rodriguez struggled for two years with an “extreme addiction” to the social media platforms before taking her own life last year.

Instagram and Snapchat have deliberately designed algorithms that keep teens hooked onto their platforms and “promote problematic and excessive use that they know is indicative of addictive and self-destructive use,” according to the lawsuit, filed in San Francisco’s federal court.

Mother Tammy Rodriguez, who lives in Connecticut, said her daughter ran away from home when she tried to impose limitations on Selena’s access to the platforms. She then took her daughter to a therapist who said “she had never seen a patient as addicted to social media as Selena.”

The lawsuit also notes that: “While on Instagram and Snapchat, Selena was constantly solicited for sexually exploitive content. She succumbed to the pressure and sent sexually explicit images using Snapchat, which were leaked and shared with her classmates, increasing the ridicule and embarrassment she experienced at school.”

Attorney Matthew Bergman, who founded the Social Media Victims Law Center in Seattle and represents Rodriguez’s mother, says the case is one of the first of its kind against Meta, formerly known as Facebook Inc.

A separate suit filed by Bergman last week involves a mother in Oregon who blames Meta and Snap for her 15-year-old daughter developing “numerous mental health conditions including multiple inpatient psychiatric admissions, an eating disorder, self-harm, and physically and mentally abusive behaviors toward her mother and siblings.”

The suit also states that the teen was “frequently messaged and solicited for sexually exploitive content and acts by adult men through the applications.”

Bergman added that he anticipates many more such lawsuits in the future, particularly after former Facebook employee Frances Haugen testified before the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee in October of last year.

“I am here today because I believe Facebook’s products harm children,” whistleblower Haugen told the Senate. A consumer protection investigation of Meta, based on documents shared by Haugen, was launched the following month, with a particular focus on how Meta was both aware of and intentionally hid evidence that Instagram harms children and teenagers.

In 2017, 14 year-old Molly Russell took her own life after becoming addicted to self-harm content uploaded to Instagram. Her father, Ian Russell, accused Facebook-owned Instagram of “helping to kill” his daughter. Haugen suggested that Instagram’s algorithms may have shown Molly harmful content before she had even searched for it.

Molly Russell

In 2021, the Russell family had an app using their deceased daughter’s likeness for pornographic content removed from the Google Play Store. Molly’s photograph had been stolen by a “forced feminization” fetishist and used in male “sissy kink” stories.

According to a decade-long study published in 2021 in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence, “girls who started using social media at two to three hours a day or more at age 13, and then increased [that use] over time, had the highest levels of suicide risk in emerging adulthood.” Among boys, however, no such pattern emerged.

In the 2020 Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt explains that suicide rates among young women and girls have skyrocketed since 2009 – the year that social media first became available on smartphones.


Reduxx is a newly-launched, independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re able to continue our work exposing predators and reporting the truth thanks to the generous support of our readers.