Home Blog Page 143

Usuario de Twitter que amenazó a JK Rowling resultó ser “feminista” irlandés

La famosa autora J.K. Rowling denunció a la red social Twitter por incumplimiento de sus políticas de seguridad luego de que una cuenta publicara su dirección personal junto a un mensaje amenazador que se mantuvo visible durante días pese a varios informes de censura que se habían emitido. Reduxx pudo identificar a el usuario detrás de la cuenta infractora. Se trata de una activista y organizador irlandés que se autodenomina “feminista”.  

Rowling desató una ola de preocupación entre los internautas el 1ero de julio luego de compartir una captura de pantalla de un tweet perturbador dirigido a su persona y fechado el 14 de junio.

Publicado originalmente por el usuario @fuckfinegael, el retweet de la cita presentaba dos imágenes: La primera era de Rowling con su dirección superpuesta sobre su rostro y una bomba casera en la esquina, mientras que la otra era la de un manual de municiones improvisadas. La guía, publicada originalmente por el Ejército de los EE. UU. en 1969, se creó con el propósito de enseñarle a los soldados cómo crear armas y explosivos utilizando recursos limitados.

En su tweet con la captura de pantalla, Rowling aclaró que había ocultado la dirección de su familia para evitar que esta tuviera mayor circulación.

El mensaje amenazante había sido en respuesta directa a una publicación de Rowling en apoyo a un hombre en proceso de detransición.

En su escrito, Rowling afirmó que la cuenta aún estaba activa a pesar de haber hecho pública la dirección de su casa con obvia mala intención. Después de que el tweet de Rowling se publicara, la cuenta, @fuckfinegael, fue desactivada y luego eliminada por el usuario, lo que sugiere que Twitter no tomó ninguna medida punitiva. Desde entonces, el nombre de usuario ha sido tomado por un internauta sin relación alguna con los hechos.

Antes de la desactivación, la única otra información sobre la identidad de @fuckfinegael era un nombre: Shane.

Pero a pesar de estar desactivado, una búsqueda rápida a través de WayBackMachine de Internet Archive, de acceso público, rápidamente reveló que la cuenta le perteneció a Shane Murray, un activista por temas de justicia social de origen irlandés.

Una captura de pantalla de la cuenta de Murray tomada en el 2021 por el sistema automatizado de WayBackMachine, muestra que se describía a sí mismo como un organizador de múltiples grupos de justicia social, incluidos End Image-Based Sexual Abuse (End ISBA) Ireland, Youth Against Racism and Inequality y ROSA Movimiento Social Feminista de Irlanda.

En dos ocasiones Murray apareció como coordinador de redes sociales para la campaña End ISBA durante el 2020, tanto en el University Times como en el College Tribune. El grupo de defensa fue un esfuerzo lanzado por los representantes de la Unión de Estudiantes de la University College Dublin, de los cuales Murray formaba parte, y se centró en atacar los cibercriminales, específicamente los de naturaleza sexual como los propagadores de “pornografía de venganza”

El año pasado, la cuenta oficial de Twitter de End ISBA reveló que Murray era miembro de su equipo y contaba con una certificación por parte Ohana Zero Suicide en el área de concientización de situaciones de crisis. Justo antes de desactivar su cuenta en Twitter, Murray maltrató a mujeres que hacían públicas sus críticas a la ideología de género y sugirió , en al menos un caso archivado, a una feminista que se suicidara.

En noviembre del 2020, Murray fue enaltecido por el Sindicato de Estudiantes del University College Dublin como una activista “feminista interseccional”.

Según los registros de WayBackMachine, Murray desactivó su cuenta de Twitter en abril del 2021, solo para regresar en mayo del 2022 con el claro propósito de encontrar entradas para un concierto que quería ver. No fue hasta junio que comenzó a usar la cuenta regularmente, además revelando que ahora se identifica como transgénero.

Desde entonces, Murray ha desactivado todas sus redes sociales, incluyendo su cuenta de Facebook.

El 2 de julio, la Policía de Escocia anunció que había abierto una investigación oficial sobre las amenazas dirigidas a Rowling.

Desde el primer momento en el 2019 cuando Rowling reveló que sentía preocupación por el impacto de la ideología de género tras apoyar a la feminista británica Maya Forstater, se convirtió blanco de amplios abusos por parte de activistas trans, medios de comunicación y otras celebridades.

A principios de este año, la muerte fantasiosa de Rowling se celebró dentro las páginas de una novela gore éxito en ventas por medio de Amazon titulada Manhunt. Descrita como un “horror LGBTQ”, la trama del libro se centra en hombres transidentificados que asesinan brutalmente a feministas, conocidas como “TERF”.

En un tweet promueve al libro publicado por la autora, Gretchen Felker-Martin, se alude a la muerte de JK Rowling como un punto de entretenimiento.

El libro contiene dos referencias a la muerte de la autora de Harry Potter: una en la que es quemada viva y una segunda alegoría de su muerte en forma de la destrucción de un arma llamada Galbraith.

Las ‘TERF’ en la novela también se conocen como “los Caballeros de JK Rowling”, y dichas guerreras participan en la brutalización y el abuso sexual de hombres identificados como trans.

Los detalles de este artículo han sido enviados a la Policía de Escocia.


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes! Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon.

Viral Video Showing Child at Drag Strip Show Sparks Outrage, Concern Over Safeguarding

A TikTok showing a very young girl being led through a bar by a half-nude drag queen with breast implants is making the rounds on Twitter and sparking outrage from netizens concerned about the girl’s safety.

On July 2, popular YouTuber Lauren Chen posted a TikTok she had found to her Twitter, writing: “These people belong in jail. This is a hill I’m willing to die on.”

The disturbing footage shows a very young girl being led by a provocatively dressed drag queen. The drag queen only had nipple pasties covering what appeared to be breast implants, and money stuffed into the skimpy underwear of his outfit. The girl is being held by the hand as the drag queen struts through a restaurant area, and continuously looks up at the man’s exposed body. The child also appears to also be clutching a few dollar bills in her free hand.

Overlayed onto the video is the text: “Children belong at drag shows!!!! Children deserve to see fun & expression & freedom!”

The source of the video posted by Chen was TikTok by user Nonie Kalra, who uploaded the original to her account earlier today. In her bio, she advertises a fundraiser for the Marsha P. Johnson foundation.

Kalra tagged the establishment the video was taken in — a Latin restaurant which caters to the LGBT community in Miami called R House Wynwood. On its website, the multi-purpose venue advertises hosting a ‘Drag Extravaganza‘ on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday evenings. Last year, Secret Miami ranked R House #1 on a list of “Fabulous LGBTQ Bars To Check Out In Miami.”

While it is unclear if the child in the video is Kalra’s or if she was just filming an occurrence at the restaurant while there, Kalra was supportive of it, writing in the comments “baby was in awe” in reference to the little girl apparently enjoying the show.

On a post from its Instagram made exactly two weeks ago, R House Wynwood posted a photo of a topless drag queen who looks similar to the one in the video uploaded by Chen. The caption reads: “We live for Escalando nights. What to expect? Salsa, drinks and a hell of a show.”

Since Chen’s post went live, the original TikTok has become inundated with negative comments, with many concerned users expressing outrage that a small child had been allowed in such a dramatically inappropriate setting.

On Twitter, users are similarly expressing disgust. Even a politician has since gotten involved, with Texas State Representative James White asking Chen where the event had occurred.

Many are wondering if punitive action is going to take place, and questioning the legality of having a child in a bar late at night.

“Where are the parents and why are they ok with this?” Asked one user in response to the video, with another replying: “Seriously. [I don’t know] how I could be just a random dude in that place and not stand up and at least say something. This is absolutely insane.”

Drag shows and their appropriateness for youth have become hot topics over the last few years, especially since the controversial spread of Drag Queen Story Hours across North America and Europe. In 2019, it was discovered that a registered sex offender had been performing at a Texas library for children as a Drag Queen.

On June 24, a Pennsylvania-based drag queen with a history of performing in front of children was charged with 25 counts of the possession and distribution of child sexual exploitation material following a 2-year long investigation by law enforcement officials.

Earlier in June, a video of ‘drag queens’ performing provocatively for an audience of children at a gay bar in Texas went viral on Twitter, prompting massive backlash and raising concerns about child safeguarding. The children were seated in front of a sign which read “It’s Not Gonna Lick Itself” as they watched drag queens perform, tipping the adults in cash.

The event had been subject to protests by right-wing advocacy group Protect Kids Texas, which stated on Twitter that they had 80 people outside of the venue voicing their concerns. The group also posted a video showing police showing up to the bar and escorting children from the venue.


Reduxx is your independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

Twitter User Who Threatened JK Rowling Is Irish “Feminist” Organizer

Famed author J.K. Rowling called out Twitter’s lack of policy enforcement after an account which released her address with a threatening message was allowed to remain active for days despite reports. Reduxx has now learned that the user behind the account is an Irish social justice activist and “feminist” organizer.

Rowling set off a firestorm of concern from netizens on July 1 after uploading a screenshot of a disturbing tweet that had been directed at her from June 14.

Originally posted by user @fuckfinegael, the quote retweet featured two images — one of Rowling with her address overlayed on her face and a pipe bomb in the corner, and the other of an Improvised Munitions Handbook. The guide, originally published by the US Army in 1969, was created for the purposes of teaching soldiers how to create explosives and weapons using limited resources.

In her tweet of the screenshot, Rowling clarified she had covered her family’s address to prevent further circulation.

The threatening message had been in direct response to a post Rowling had made in support of a male detransitioner.

In her post, Rowling stated that the account was still active despite having released her home address with an obviously abusive connotation. After Rowling’s tweet went live, the account, @fuckfinegael, was deactivated and then deleted by the user, suggesting no action by Twitter had been taken. The handle has since been claimed by a user unrelated to the situation.

Prior to deactivating, @fuckfinegael‘s only other identifying information was a first name: Shane.

But despite being deactivated, a quick search through the publicly-accessible Internet Archive’s WayBackMachine will quickly reveal that the account belongs to Shane Murray, an Irish social justice activist.

A screen capture of Murray’s account from 2021, taken by the WayBackMachine’s automated system, shows he described himself as an organizer with multiple social justice groups, including End Image-Based Sexual Abuse (End ISBA) Ireland, Youth Against Racism and Inequality, and ROSA Social Feminist Movement Ireland.

Murray was featured as a social media coordinator for the End ISBA campaign on two occasions in 2020, in both the University Times and the College Tribune. The advocacy group was an effort launched by University College Dublin Student Union representatives of which Murray was one, and was focused on targeting internet-based abuses, specifically that of a sexual nature such as ‘revenge pornography.’

Last year, the End ISBA official Twitter revealed Murray was one of its team members certified by Ohana Zero Suicide in crisis awareness training. Just prior to deactivating his Twitter account, Murray abused women critical of gender ideology and, in at least one archived instance, suggested a feminist commit suicide.

In November of 2020, Murray was highlighted by the University College Dublin Students’ Union as an “intersectional feminist” activist.

According to WayBackMachine logs, Murray deactivated his Twitter account in April of 2021, only to return in May of 2022 with the stated purpose of finding spare tickets to a concert he wanted to see. It wasn’t until June that he began to use the account regularly again, this time also revealing he identified as transgender.

Murray has since deactivated all social media, including his Facebook.

On July 2, Police Scotland announced an official investigation had been launched into the threats aimed at Rowling.

Since first revealing she had concerns about the impact of gender ideology in 2019 by throwing her support behind British feminist Maya Forstater, Rowling has been the subject of ample abuse from trans activists, media, and other celebrities.

Earlier this year, Rowling’s fantasized death was celebrated in an Amazon-bestselling gore novel titled Manhunt. Described as an ‘LGBTQ horror,’ the plot of the book is centered around trans-identified males graphically murdering feminists, referred to as ‘TERFs.’

In a Tweet advertising the book published by the author, Gretchen Felker-Martin, the death of JK Rowling is alluded to and treated as a point of entertainment.

The book contains two references to the death of the Harry Potter author: one in which she is burned alive, and a second allegory of her demise in the form of a weapon called the Galbraith being destroyed.

The ‘TERFs’ in the novel are also referred to as “the Knights of JK Rowling,” with the women holding her namesake participating in the brutalization and sexual abuse of trans-identified males.

The details in this article have been passed on to Police Scotland.


Reduxx is your independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation

Homeless Man Says He Was Cut Off From Rehab, Food Due to ‘Gender Ideology’

A musician in Portland, Oregon has come forward reveal the extent of the gender lobby’s power over social and political institutions in the city — welding such immense influence that it left him not only homeless, but unable to access crucial services.

Matt Insley explains that his entire situation of homelessness was caused after a ‘cancellation’ when he deviated from popular opinion on emerging gender trends three years ago.

Insley was incarcerated from 2010 to 2014 in Columbia River prison. While there, he created a successful music school for the incarcerated men, one which is now run by Grammy-award winning artist Nate Query, the bassist for The Decemberists. After serving his sentence, he became active in Portland’s music scene, and enjoyed a great deal of local success.

“I was a rush-hour DJ on the nation’s first LGBT FM radio station … I covered major events, I was an award-winning composer and producer.” Insley describes feeling as though he were “on top of the world” prior to expressing an opinion he says changed the course of his life.

Insley in 2018, featured by the Portland Tribune.

“I was fully booked, winning awards, directing and composing my music… and then I started questioning how gender ideology was evolving. I started referring to it as ‘the non-binary fad.'” Insley says he hadn’t even taken issue with transgenderism, but had begun expressing some confusion about the increasing popularity of ‘non-binary’ identities around 2019.

“The moment I started questioning the non-binary thing, I was unable to get work … I was known as the well-connected guy who could get anyone [arts] funding. I was hosting fundraisers every month for different organizations… And they just shut it all off.”

Insley, who is gay, explains that after he was branded a ‘transphobe’ for questioning hip ‘gender identities,’ he became a pariah in notoriously-woke Portland.

“I had bricks thrown through my friend’s window… I have had to change my phone number four times. If [activists] find my number, they pass it around.”

Unable to get work, he lost his stable housing and quickly became homeless and transient. But, he explains that as a person who has been living with HIV for 13 years, leaving Oregon was out of the question.

“I have no money to leave, and, quite honestly, despite the setbacks of Portland, the funding for the HIV programs is some of the best in the country,” Insley explains, “If I tried to leave, I would need to make sure I had access to all of the same resources. So it’s not like I can up and move.”

Stuck in Portland, Insley paints a bleak picture. He explains that ‘gender ideology,’ that which left him homeless in the first place, also wields an increasing amount of power over the key institutions he now relies upon.

He explains he has been on the general housing waiting list since losing his stable housing after no longer being able to find employment. In total, he has been waiting over two years, a time frame he says is far longer than the average person would experience.

“I didn’t notice it until after what should have been the average wait was far exceeded, then I started having questions … Everyone I have spoken to says I have been waiting for way too long, and even acknowledged people have gone ahead of me,” Insley explains, noting he then discovered those with identity-based mental health issues, such as gender dysphoria, are being provided housing on an accelerated basis, sometimes within just months.

“The doctors are saying the hormones and surgeries for them are ‘life saving’ and therefore they need a high priority into housing.”

In August of 2021, Insley was referred to the Quest Center for Integrative Health — a federally-funded resource center specifically for LGBT individuals in Portland. He had just graduated from in-patient rehab for his addiction to alcohol, and was set to do out-patient through the Center, which would have also been able to provide him with housing, therapy, and various other needed services.

“Out of an hour-long class that was supposed to be on addiction, maybe 45 minutes was dedicated to pronouns and trans people’s struggles,” Insley says. Confused about the program’s angle, he contacted the Center and expressed his confusion.

“I said that I was concerned that more time was being spent on pronouns than my recovery.”

In one email Insley had sent to Quest, he stated he was comfortable using people’s names rather than their pronouns in the event group-work was needed.

“I’ll simply say someone’s name every time other than using a pronoun in group. I won’t call a man a woman. I think I should still be allowed in this program. In other words: even though I feel this way, I’m in the G and I deserve these services as much as anyone else in the alphabet spew,” Insley wrote in his email.

Shortly after, Insley received a response from Ryan Christianson, an addiction counselor with Quest. In an email shared with Reduxx, Christianson wrote that Insley’s concerns about gender ideology did not align with the values of the center, and he was being referred back to his addictions case manager.

“My case manager had referred me for housing through Quest. After [Christianson] sent me that email, I was no longer applicable for that housing.” Insley explains that due to gaps in the way services are managed in Oregon for people with addiction and mental health diagnoses, there was little his case manager could continue to do.

“[My case manager] told me that because my situation involved mental health and addiction, she couldn’t help me because she only provides resources for addiction,” Insley says, “So, because I’m dual diagnosis, there was no help for me after Quest. And because they provided all of those different services, to deny me access to Quest was to deny me access to everything.”

Insley says he continued to try and contact other staff at Quest to address his concerns, but never received a response.

But his list of run-ins with gender ideologue-controlled resources didn’t end there.

Earlier this year, Insley says he was turned away from Esther’s Pantry — the only food bank in the area specifically for people with HIV. The Pantry is run by Brent Blackwell, a drag queen who also goes by the name Summer Lynn Seasons.

“I arrived and went to put in my list for food, and they told me I had to come back the next day,” Insley says, noting that the had been told it was a day reserved for gender non-conforming and “BIPOC” people, an acronym standing for Black, Indigenous, and (other) People of Color.

Insley explains claiming to be ‘gender non-conforming’ or ‘trans’ was out of the question, as his high profile within the LGBT community of Portland would result in him surely being identified anyway. He chose to simply leave.

“This might shock you …” he begins sarcastically, “… but causing an issue around trans people in front of trans people — especially here in Portland with the anti-fascists? They can get quite violent.”

Insley says after he was turned away, he managed to get an emergency ration for that evening at a Church, noting: “It’s funny that Churches have helped me more than gay organizations have, these past couple of years.”

He explains that food banks in the city are only open during a certain hour, and he had used his small window of time trying to go to Esther’s due to its specific servicing for the HIV positive community.

“We are not a big enough community for them to require special days so certain people can get access. We are just not that huge. It is people with HIV. There are quite a few people with HIV in Portland, but not enough to justify having a certain day for certain people and excluding others.”

Insley attempted to contact Our House of Portland, the organization which facilitates Esther’s Pantry, to lodge a complaint, but was quickly dismissed. When asked if he was concerned any further complaint would lead to his food access at the Pantry being cut off entirely, as with other services, Insley says: “Yes. Absolutely.”

Insley explains a culture of fear prevents people from speaking out against powerful trans groups in Portland, and that he quickly backed down.

“What they would have done is painted me to be an aggressor who was unsafe to transgender people. That’s what they would have done. They would have painted me as a villain, and said I was an unsafe person for gender non-conforming people to be around.” He continues: “I have to have food. I have to maintain my status on the housing waiting list, and I feel like if I do one thing out of step they are going to find a reason to boot me, even though they are already finding reasons to push me down the list.”

Insley isn’t the first person in a particularly vulnerable situation who found their access to needed resources threatened after expressing concerns about gender ideology.

As previously revealed by Reduxx, a sexual abuse survivor in Vancouver, British Columbia was evicted from a women’s domestic violence shelter after becoming increasingly concerned about the impact of gender ideology on women’s rights.

Jane, whose identity was protected by Reduxx at her request, had been exposed to multiple disturbing incidents in the shelter after arriving due to the presence of two trans-identified males who had been housed amongst the women.

For Insley, he says he was unconcerned with protecting his identity, feeling as though public exposure to his problems may provide him some opportunity to better navigate his situation. But as his life continues to leave him scrambling for a safe place to sleep every night, he hopes speaking out will also educate people on the way gender ideology is now impacting even homeless people and their access to needed resources.

“I would like to see our housing and medical system get back to having a proper sense of prioritization. It’s deeply upsetting to see people that are pursuing elective treatments and using neopronouns being treated as if their situation is life-threatening.” Insley says, but concluding: “[These changes shouldn’t] require someone like me having to expose my own vulnerable situation just to break through the cacophony of gender ideology.”

Reduxx did reach out to the Quest Center for comment, but did not receive a response.


Reduxx is a 100% reader funded source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. This Exclusive was made possible by the generosity of our supports. Help us platform more stories and get behind our mission by joining our Patreon. Or, consider making a one-time donation through cryptocurrency or PayPal.

“Extreme Sexual Material” Being Taught Alongside Gender Identity in UK Schools

A Tory MP has criticized a UK 2020 Government guidance on sex education in schools which she says has “opened the floodates” to children being exposed to “extreme and inappropriate” sexual content in the classroom.

Miriam Cates, a member of the Commons’ education committee and Conservative MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge, criticized the Relationships and Sex Education guidance (RSE) at a Westminster Hall debate.

The RSE framework allowed for external sex education organizations to provide resources to schools, resulting in children being exposed “to a plethora of deeply inappropriate, wildly inaccurate, sexually explicit and damaging materials” which contribute to what she calls the “sexualization and adultification of children.”

MP Cates referenced a learning pack provided by the LGBT charity Diversity Role Models which was found to contain the phrase “Love has no age limit,” a slogan that has historically been associated with pedophile rights advocates.

“If we tell children that ‘love has no age’… Do we undermine their understanding of the age of consent?”, MP Cates said.

Screenshot from LGBT charity Diversity Role Models. Source: Transgender Trend

Also included in the Diversity Role Models pack, though not cited by Cates, was a list of book recommendations provided by Diversity Role Models. One recommended book, titled “Beyond Magenta: Transgender Teens Speak Out,” contained a graphic account of a six year-old child performing oral sex.

Cates went on to reference learning resources from the Sex Education Forum that that divided children into either “menstruators” or “non-menstruators,” and cautioned that this would cause confusion among girls.

“If a teenage girl’s periods don’t start, what will she think? How will she know this isn’t normal? How does she know to consult a doctor? How will she know she’s not pregnant? Will she just assume she’s one of the ‘non-menstruators’?”

In addition to gender identity, Cates pointed out that lessons about BDSM and rough sex are being utilized.

Lessons for children aged 14 and older provided through Bish, created by Justin Hancock, describe rough sex in an uncritical manner, including slapping and choking.

“If there’s little or no care or consent, these things are acts of violence and criminal offences,” notes Bish, before saying that “rough sex is quite common, [and] most of the time it is probably consensual.”

Screenshot from bishuk.com

“BDSM is now just a general term which applies to activities, or fantasies, or scenes, that involve a consensual exchange of power,” explains Bish’s website.

“The introduction of graphic or extreme sexual material in sex education lessons also reinforces the porn culture that is damaging our children in such a devastating way,” Cates said. She then quoted research which found that “half of all fourteen year-olds have seen pornography online, much of it violent and degrading.”

Speaking with the BBC about her concerns regarding the education materials, MP Cates told presenters that she could not provide explicit details, as doing so would violate their broadcast rules.

UK-based NGO We Can’t Consent to This publishes research on the harms of physically abusive sex in response to the increasing numbers of women and girls killed and injured during intimate acts.

According to their site, which also documents profiles of the women murdered by males who would go on to claim the ‘rough sex’ defense, 38% of UK women under the age of 40 have experienced unwanted slapping, spitting, strangulation, or gagging in otherwise consensual sex.

In 2020, BBC Disclosure and BBC 5Live commissioned a survey of 2,049 men in the UK aged 18 to 39, and found that 71% of them said they had slapped, choked, gagged or spat on their partner during consensual sex.

The ‘rough sex’ defense has been used in over 60 homicides of women in the United Kingdom alone, representing a 10-fold increase in the use of the claims between 1996 and 2016.


Reduxx is your independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation

OPINION: Male ‘Lesbians’ … A Brief History Of An Invasive Species

Among the first casualties of transgenderism and the ideology it spawned were the sexual and social boundaries of lesbians. But very few know that the problem is far older than this nouveau iteration of what is often referred to as a “culture war.”

In recent years, the exclusivity of on- and offline lesbian spaces have been repeatedly subject to scrutiny from those who clamor for the “inclusion” of trans-identified males. Women who assert their right to keep these spaces single-sex, or who express their attractions as being rooted in sex and not the mystical concept of gender, are met with hostility and branded as bigots.

For example, in 2012, Planned Parenthood of Toronto held a workshop called Overcoming the Cotton Ceiling: Breaking Down Sexual Barriers for Queer Trans Women. The purpose of the workshop was to discuss the “barriers” (cotton underwear) faced by “queer trans women” in “queer women’s communities.” The workshop description also noted that participants would strategize ways to “overcome” these barriers.

The Cotton Ceiling workshop was recently referenced at a court hearing in May. Allison Bailey, a barrister and lesbian activist, took Stonewall and Garden Court Chambers to an employment tribunal for policing her livelihood due to her views on gender ideology. During the course of the hearing, the idea that lesbians must include males in their sexuality was likened to the racial integration of South Africa.

But this was hardly the first time lesbians have been deemed “sexual racists” for not wanting to affirm the identity of males. Nor was it the first time that trans-identified males had attempted to force their way into lesbian communities and lives.

In fact, this is a phenomena goes back decades — right to the beginnings of modern lesbian social and political organizing.

While today’s transgender movement tries to position nebulous conceptions of “gender” over the factual reality and importance of sex, the lesbians of the early gay liberation movement suffered no such confusion. In fact, many who were initially involved in the Gay Liberation Front, which was formed after the 1969 Stonewall Riots, shifted their focus to the growing women’s movement instead. They felt that the gay rights movement was male-dominated and that their interests would be better served by organizing for the specific interests of their own sex.

One of the groups formed by these early lesbian activists was the Radicalesbians. Founded in 1970, the Radicalesbians distributed a manifesto titled “The Woman-Identified Woman” at the Second Congress to Unite Women in New York City. The manifesto focused heavily on the reality of living as a female in a male-dominated society. It helped set the stage for later radical feminist and lesbian feminist thinking.

An early example of heterosexual males in the lesbian movement and lesbian lives came later that same year, when folk singer Beth Elliot (Elliott Basil Mattiuzzi) sent a “Letter from a Transsexual” to the radical feminist newspaper It Ain’t Me Babe. “I am a transsexual,” Elliot wrote. “On the intellectual and emotional levels, I know myself to be a woman; on the physical level, my own body denies me this.” Elliot also described how he met and had sex with an “exclusively gay” woman who “could really see my being a woman.”

The editors of the paper invited Elliot to a conversation where they tried to talk him out of undergoing a sex change operation, telling him that it “shouldn’t matter whether one is born with female or male genitalia. That’s our point.” It continues: “As your new reality emerges, as you are able to live it to any degree, you should be able to feel differently about your body.”

Nevertheless, in 1971, Elliot joined and became the vice president of the San Francisco chapter of the Daughters of Bilitis — a lesbian political organization — despite some members’ protestations. He also served as the editor of the group’s newsletter, Sisters. However, accusations of sexual harassment against Elliot in 1972 led to a vote which removed him from the group and barred the inclusion of any trans-identified males in the chapter.

Unable to take a hint, Elliot joined the organizing committee of the West Coast Lesbian Conference in 1973, where he was also slated to perform. On the first night of the conference, a lesbian separatist group called the Gutter Dykes passed out leaflets protesting the presence of a man. Elliot did briefly perform but left soon afterward. 

The following day, keynote speaker Robin Morgan amended her address in light of the previous day’s events. Her speech, titled “Lesbianism and Feminism: Synonyms or Contradictions?” contained some strong opinions about referring to men as women.

“No, I will not call a male ‘she,'” Morgan passionately declared, “Thirty-two years of suffering in this androcentric society and of surviving, have earned me the name ‘woman.’ One walk down the street by a male transvestite, five minutes of his being hassled (which he may enjoy), and then he dares, he dares to think he understands our pain? No. In our mothers’ names and in our own, we must not call him sister.”

Morgan’s words rippled through feminist and lesbian communities over the proceeding decade.

By 1977, DYKE magazine had published a six-page feature titled “Can Men Be Women? Some Lesbians Think So! Transsexuals in the Women’s Movement.” The story presented a conversation about some lesbians’ baffling acceptance of men who claim to be same-sex attracted females, like themselves.

Janet, one of the interviewees stated: “That is what is so weird to me, what I find so scary about the way a lot of Lesbians have reacted to the transsexual issue. The attitude seems to be that however someone presents themself, that is the way you are supposed to see them … No distinction is made between respecting someone else and suspending your own perceptions. It is always tempting to be passive.”

Fellow interviewee Liza agreed, writing: “It is also very tempting to be generous. I think that a lot of Lesbians say they have gone through such a hard time being accepted as Lesbians and now these poor transsexuals are having such a hard time and here we are in the same boat, both oppressed by the same culture. If we recognize them as our sisters it helps everybody. It is very generous and I appreciate that in women, but it is really shortsighted.”

It is incredible how the discussions on this topic from more than 30 years ago feel like they could have been plucked from any heated social media page today.

In 1978, the issue was given even greater prominence in the book Gyn/Ecology by Mary Daly, a radical feminist and theologian who taught at Boston College for more than three decades. In a section of her book, “Boundary Violation and the Frankenstein Phenomenon,” Daly opined that “transsexualism is an example of male surgical siring which invades the female world with substitutes.” 

Daly was a dissertation advisor for Janice Raymond, who went on to become an even more prominent critic of transsexualism. In 1979, Raymond published The Transsexual Empire: The Making of the She-Male, which highlights many of the issues we are still dealing with. In the book, Raymond argues that transsexualism reinforces gender stereotypes and that it is just another method of patriarchal oppression. 

An entire section of the book titled “Sappho by Surgery: The Transsexually Constructed Lesbian-Feminist” deals with the issue of men who claim to be lesbians. Such a man, writes Raymond, “attempts to possess women at a deeper level, this time under the guise of challenging rather than conforming to the role and behavior of stereotyped femininity.”

In a particularly prophetic section, Raymond raises some questions that one could argue reflect the state of the modern lesbian community:

Will the acceptance of transsexually constructed lesbian-feminists who have lost only their outward appendages of physical masculinity lead to the containment and control of lesbian feminists? Will every lesbian-feminist space become a harem?

The only point where Raymond seems to have missed the mark is in the fact that most male lesbians today have not lost their “outward appendage” and, in fact, are very proud of it.

In his book, Transgender History, prominent trans-identified male “lesbian” Susan Stryker helpfully provides us with evidence that Raymond’s ideas were alive and well several years after her book’s publication.

Stryker includes a fiery excerpt from an anonymous 1986 letter to the editor of the San Francisco lesbian newspaper Coming Up:

When an estrogenated man with breasts loves women, that is not lesbianism, that is mutilated perversion. [Such an individual] is not a threat to the lesbian community, he is an outrage to us. He is not a lesbian, he is a mutant man, a self-made freak, a deformity, an insult. He deserves a slap in the face. After that, he deserves to have his body and his mind made well again.

The gay community was still grappling with transsexual (at this point also often referred to as transgender) inclusion during the 1993 March on Washington for Lesbian, Gay and Bi Equal Rights and Liberation.

Contrary to the claim of some modern trans activists that the “T” was always part of the acronym, that was not yet the case. The national steering committee of the march did seek to add “transgender” to the title, but it did not receive the necessary majority vote to do so. Over the next few years, however, it became more common for lesbian, gay, and bisexual organizations to include “transgender” in their names and transgender issues in their mandates.

Around this time, another controversy was brewing regarding the Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival—often referred to as Michfest—because the predominantly lesbian festival had made clear in 1991 that the event was for “womyn-born womyn,” i.e., females.

This made some males very angry, and they organized an annual demonstration named “Camp Trans” to protest the fact that women had created a female-exclusive entertainment space. Michfest was also criticized by prominent LGBT organizations like GLAAD and the Human Rights Campaign. The festival, which began in 1976, held its final event in 2015 after years of facing increasingly ruthless scrutiny.

The termination of Michfest marked the end of an era, and the beginning of the end in general for lesbian spaces where same-sex attracted women could socialize with one another without the incursion of males.

Lesbian bars were also dying out — not even notoriously-woke Portland had any lesbian bars left by 2016. Identity politics like those that shut down Michfest made it a minefield to create spaces and events that would exclude males who identified as lesbian women. In 2021, Smithsonian Magazine reported that there were only 15 lesbian bars left in the entirety of the United States.

It is now 2022.

Same-sex marriage is legal, and the expectation that homosexual people are free to live their lives is commonplace. Yet, we are facing a new predicament where this generation of lesbians are rapidly losing access to their needed exclusive communities. The music festivals and lesbian conferences once attended by hundreds and even thousands of women are a thing of the past, and any attempt to hold a similar event today would be met with rabid protest.

All of that being said… I do believe there is a silver lining, though it be a somewhat bleak one.

Trans rights activists are becoming increasingly emboldened in their abusive behavior towards lesbians (and all women) that the trickle of criticism seeping through the cracks is inevitably bound to turn into a flood. More and more lesbians are speaking out, joined by feminists and women from all walks of life, and even prominent voices, such as that of Harry Potter author JK Rowling, are joining in to apply pressure.

It might feel sometimes like we are stuck rehashing arguments from the 1970s, but we should be proud to take up the mantle of the women who saw this coming for the benefit of those yet to come.


Reduxx is your independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation

EXCLUSIVE: Trans Inmate Highlighted by Mainstream Media Was Abusing Staff, Female Inmates

Female inmates have come forward and provided testimony that calls into question the narrative of a trans-identified male inmate who was highlighted by media as a victim of transphobia while housed at the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women (EMCF) in New Jersey.

Raequan ‘Rae’ Rollins, a trans-identifying male inmate, was sentenced in 2019 to four years in prison for a violent robbery incident. After five months in a male facility, Rollins changed his legal gender marker to ‘female’ and was subsequently transferred to the Edna Mahan women’s estate in October of that year.

Speaking with Reduxx, Kokila Hiatt, a current inmate at EMCF who was incarcerated when Rollins was transferred, claimed that Rollins “frequently stated that ‘no one [in the prison] can beat me’ and used that as an intimidation tactic against women and officers.”

“He assaulted many officers and was given a disciplinary charge once for either threatening to sexually assault a female staff member or saying something sexually derogatory to a female staff member,” Hiatt added.

But most disturbingly, Hiatt asserts that Rollins had been responsible for one of the most extreme events of prison guard brutality against EMCF inmates in the prison’s recent history — an incident that left six women severely physically battered.

On January 11, 2021, during what ought to have been routine “cell extractions” conducted to search for contraband, the prison officers wore riot gear, carried pepper spray canisters and shields, and moved in formations of five from cell to cell. EMCF guards brutally beat inmates in what has been described as a coordinated attack.

Footage recorded by officers during the incident was released in June of 2021 by local news, and showed the disturbing scenes as they unfolded.

“The context of [that day] was that the inmates, both him and the women, had been throwing bodily fluids on officers for at least a week straight,” Hiatt told Reduxx. “This is behavior not typical of women, and what I have noticed is that these [trans-identified males] come here and introduce these kinds of tactics to the women inmates. It’s not that women are unaware of these things, but it is just not typical behavior for them.”

Gassing, also known as ‘chucking,’ is an act of rebellion by inmates against prison staff using bodily excretions as projectiles. The most common bodily excretions thrown include feces, urine, semen, or saliva. As it carries a high risk of spreading infectious diseases, it is considered a felony in most U.S. states. The vast majority of gassing incidents reported from U.S. prisons have occurred in male facilities.

After the January 11 incident, Rollins launched a lawsuit against the New Jersey Department of Corrections and subsequently received widespread media attention. Rollins’ gender identity was a central focus of the stories, and the six women who had been beaten were often a small detail, if mentioned at all. In some cases, the brutality directed towards him by officers was framed as an act of ‘transphobia.’

The New York Times interviewed Rollins’ mother about his lawsuit, and stated that “New Jersey’s only women’s prison was supposed to be a haven,” for Rollins. The violence against the women inmates was treated as ancillary to his story. Pink News reported that it was a “fact” that Rollins was a woman, and referred to the six women who were beaten as “other inmates.” CNN published multiple articles about Rollins, quoting his lawyer Oliver Barry about the “unsafe environment” he endured at EMCF.

While news of Rollins’ suit enjoyed national attention, a lawsuit filed by inmate Tatianna Harrison was only reported by one local outlet. Harrison had been one of the women brutalized that day, and revealed she “had a serious pre-existing spinal injury” which resulted in temporary paralysis after which she was handcuffed and an officer “knelt on her spine.” Her lawsuit also revealed officers had “ripped Ms. Harrison’s shirt open and pulled her pants and underwear down, exposing her groin and buttocks.”

Another one of the women assaulted during the assault, Desiree Dasilva, was hospitalized with a broken orbital bone, while another still alleged she was punched in the head 28 times while pressed face-first against the wall. Inmate Ajila Nelson said a group of officers beat and punched her, stripped off her clothes, and one male officer grabbed her breast and put his “fingers into my vagina.”

Diseree Dasilva after the January 11 attack by prison guards.

In response to Rollins’ suit, the prison’s top administrator, 22 correctional officers, and nine supervisors were suspended and an investigation was opened by the New Jersey’s Attorney General’s office. Rollins was transferred out of the women’s prison and temporarily placed in the New Jersey State Prison, before being transferred again to Pennsylvania’s State Correctional Institution at Muncy, a facility for adult female offenders. The women had no choice but to stay at EMCF.

Hiatt says Rollins should ultimately be seen as responsible for what happened on January 11, and expressed some disbelief at the media lauding him as a victim while ignoring the stories of the female inmates.

“I believe Rollins’ behavior was definitely the biggest catalyst behind administration and the officers handling the situation the way they did. The women were also misbehaving, but when you also have [Rollins] putting cops out of work week after week that surely didn’t help matters,” Hiatt told Reduxx, continuing that the January 11 incident is an example of how trans-identified males have changed the dynamic within the women’s facility.

“My intention is to get the word out about how the women here are being treated and how having men live with us has affected us in relation to the ‘transgender’ individuals being placed here. It has affected us as women and has changed the way the facility treats us.”

Hiatt’s assertions are corroborated by a now-deleted press statement issued in September 2021 by Demetrius ‘Demi’ Minor, a trans-identified male inmate, who described Rollins as inciting violence while incarcerated at Edna Mahan. “It has been pure hell. Inmate Rollins has assaulted numerous staff, causing dozens of staff members to be injured and out on leave,” reads the statement.

“Some inmates have complained and reported that inmate Rollins is telling inmates that [he] is not transgender and is simply a gay man,” Minor continued. “Rollins was involved in physical altercations with other non-transgender inmates [and] has attacked staff on numerous occasions, including throwing liquids at staff and threatening female officers.”

New Jersey’s Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women has a decades-long record of violence and sexual abuse perpetrated by staff against the incarcerated women under their supervision. Since 1990, over 70 reports have been lodged of staff-on-prisoner violations. A lawsuit filed in 1999 by two women suing the then-state corrections commissioner, superintendent and a corrections officer cited 10 incidents that had occurred during the past nine years. Their case was dismissed, and the court ruled that the administration could not be held liable for failing to protect inmates from a substantial risk of harm.

In addition, a 2020 report released by the Department of Justice detailed shocking instances of violence by staff against women inmates in what was described as a “pattern” of abuse.

The DOJ report stated that the corrections department “fails to keep prisoners at Edna Mahan safe from sexual abuse by staff, and Edna Mahan suffers from a ‘culture of acceptance’ of sexual abuse, which enabled abuse to persist “despite years of notice and efforts towards change at the state level.”

According to the report, “Edna Mahan have been aware that their women prisoners face a substantial risk of serious harm from sexual abuse, and they have failed to remedy this constitutional violation.”


Reduxx is your independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

METRO Profiles Work of Gay Rights Advocate Who Contributed to “Pro-Pedophile” Anthology

A major UK news outlet is prompting concern on social media after featuring a profile of a popular gay rights figure who contributed to a “pro-pedophile” anthology, wrote an obituary for a pedophile activist, and once claimed “children have sexual desires at an early age.”

On June 7, Metro published an article titled “Veterans from UK’s first Pride to mark 50th anniversary of ‘revolutionary’ event.” Both in the article’s graphic and the body of the piece, a photograph of a man holding a sign declaring “No Age Limit on Love” at the 1972 Pride march is prominently displayed.

While some commenters attempted to dismiss the sign as being a harmless reference to when the age of consent was higher for relationships between two males than between a male and a female, others are interpreting the sign along with the subject of the article and finding it far more nefarious.

The article is largely centered around profiling gay rights activist Peter Tatchell, a controversial figure with a long history of disturbing remarks about pedophilia and child sexual abuse.

As recently as 2018, Tatchell was forced to clarify his position on pedophilia after a letter to the Guardian he wrote in 1997 emerged. In the letter, Tatchell stated the “positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures,” and that he had friends who had engaged in “sex with adults from the ages of 9 to 13” who had enjoyed it.

Tatchell’s letter had been written in support of a book titled Dares to Speak: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Boy-love, published by the Gay Men’s Press in 1997. The book is said to have analyzed pedophilia in a favorable light, and utilized essays from Paidika, a European pro-pedophile journal.

At the time of its publication, the book had been slammed by journalist Ros Coward, who wrote that it “refuses to take seriously sexual abuse and its consequences.” Tatchell’s letter was in defense of the work, apparently displeased with Coward’s negative review.

Tatchell argued that while he was unable to condone pedophilia, not all sex involving children was “unwanted, abusive or harmful.”

After the letter emerged in 2018, Tatchell insisted his defense was misunderstood and stated he opposed child sexual abuse, and also claimed there were parts of his letter which condemned child sexual abuse that had been cut out by editors. But this was not the first instance of his comments prompting concern.

In 2009, Tatchell penned an op-ed for the Guardian advocating for the age of consent to be lowered, claiming children were being criminalized for having sex with their peers. Tatchell had previously conducted an interview with a 14-year-old prostituted child pseudonymously known as “Lee” which he claimed was for the same purpose — advocating for youth rights to be sexually active with those of similar ages. But the interview, headlined “I’m 14, I’m gay, and I want a boyfriend,” focused on Lee claiming children could consent to sex with adults, and stating he enjoying having sex with adult men.

For the interview, Tatchell would ask Lee a number of questions, some of which were sexually charged, as Lee repeatedly insisted there was no danger to his physical or mental health from having sex with adult men, and that he enjoyed being a prostitute.

“The law is stupid,” says Lee in the interview, “If I know what I’m doing and I’m not harming anyone else, I should be allowed to have sex with who I want.” Lee goes on to claim that laws deeming adult-child sex ‘indecent assault’ are “ridiculous,” stating: “I’m only 14 but I know what I’m doing. I understand what consent involves. So does the person I’m having sex with. No one is indecently assaulting me. That’s a stupid suggestion.”

At the time, Tatchell wrote that Lee was in a relationship with a man in his mid-20s, and Tatchell presented their relationship as harmless.

In a 2018 review of Tatchell’s disturbing history, feminist journalist Julie Bindel stated that in the interview “Tatchell appears only to be interested in pursuing the line about how much Lee says he likes sex with adult men.”

In 2021, Bindel, along with Melanie Newman and Hayley Dixon, revealed in the Telegraph that Tatchell had penned a book review in which he claimed that “children have sexual desires at an early age,” and praised the “courage” of those selling what he later admitted was a “pro-pedophilia” work.

The book was a collection of essays compiled by Warren Middleton, former vice-chairman of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE). Tatchell contributed a chapter for the 1986 anthology titled “Radical perspectives on “Childhood Sexuality, Intergenerational Sex, and the Social Oppression of Children and Young People.” Other chapters in the anthology covered child sexual abuse material and the normalization of pedophilia.

While he would initially claim he was bamboozled into contributing to the text, denying knowledge of what the overall work was about, Bindel, Newman, and Dixon found that he had written a favorable review of the book at a later date.

The review, titled “Radical thoughts on consent,” lamented that Middleton was unable to find a publisher, and praised the book as speaking “coolly, clearly and radically about a subject which has far too long been shrouded in emotional hysteria and adult chauvinism.”

Tatchell would go on to apologize for the review, and continue to deny any instances of knowingly associating with members of PIE.

But this was not Tatchell’s first intersection with the notorious group. In 1998, he wrote a doting obituary for Ian Dunn, the co-founder of PIE. In the obituary Tatchell calls Dunn a “pioneer for lesbian and gay human rights, remaining a central figure in the battle for homosexual equality,” but does not mention his pro-pedophilia views, which was a focal point of his activism.

Dunn had organized pedophile meetups in Glasgow throughout the 70s and 80s, proudly stating: “I am not one of those homosexuals who get cross or nervous when the subject of love between men and boys is raised.” According to journalist Julie Bindel, Dunn allegedly raped a young boy who turned up at his funeral just to “make sure he was dead.”

As with the anthology contribution, review, and Guardian letter — Tatchell would claim ignorance, and state he was unaware of any pro-pedophilia advocacy conducted by Dunn.


Reduxx is your independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

Woman Evicted From Domestic Violence Shelter After Expressing Concerns About Gender Self-ID

A Canadian woman has come forward to reveal that she was removed from a transitional shelter after expressing concerns to management about gender ideology following two disturbing incidents within the residence.

Speaking exclusively with Reduxx, Jane* says she’d never given much thought to the gender identity issue prior to being moved into Peggy’s Place, a shelter for women in a suburban neighborhood of Vancouver, British Columbia which services women struggling with mental illness who have also been the victims of domestic violence.

“Before I arrived, I had never thought or cared much about gender identity,” she says, reflecting on the lead-up to her placement at the shelter. After escaping a situation of domestic violence and experiencing difficulties in access to urgent medical care, Jane says she was initially relieved when her social worker advised her she had been found a room at the shelter in May of 2019.

“It was a door I could lock. It was a private room for myself. I had what I needed nearby.” Jane describes being asked upon intake whether she was comfortable being around trans-identified people. She explains she’d both worked and socialized with trans-identified people without issue in the past and had no problems with them, so said she was.

“I had assumed there would be a really small chance of one of them being in the house, but I figured there would be some sort of screening process in place and there wouldn’t be any violations of our boundaries.”

But shortly after Jane moved in, she found that a trans-identified male had been living in the residence, and her assumptions were rapidly proven incorrect.

At first, Jane says she’d just tried to avoid Max*, who she described as being over 6′ tall and obviously male. But just weeks after arriving, Jane says she caught him in the hall outside of her room, completely nude but for a bra he was holding to his chest as he modeled his body in the full-length mirror near Jane’s door. He was fully intact, and was not covering his genitalia in any way.

“In my mind, I shut down. There was so much fear.”

“I froze and never made direct eye contact. A part of me died. I went into my room and locked the door,” Jane says, “I kept telling myself I had a door that locked. In my mind, I shut down. There was so much fear.”

Jane states she had briefly considered returning to the house she had escaped from, but it was the fact she had a locking door and room to herself that made her feel she could make it work at the shelter.

Jane attempted to complain to staff over what had happened, but says her concerns were given a low priority and dismissed.

“They just said ‘some people don’t respect boundaries.’ Nothing was done. It didn’t matter that I had sexual trauma,” she recalls, noting that the event had taught her she needed to keep quiet.

Shortly after, Max was involved in an incident with another female shelter resident.

Jane describes Lucy* as being severely physically and intellectually disabled, and anorexic to the point of often not having the strength to walk unassisted. But Jane describes Lucy as being the victim of a violent tirade by Max, with the man screaming verbal abuse at her.

“Hearing a man scream [like that] reminded me of my dad. If someone is doing a falsetto when they speak but then drop down to their natural octave when they are enraged and screaming, it communicates to you that this is a danger in a really primal way,” Jane says, noting that she hadn’t been privy to what had set Max, but that his rampage had created unease amongst staff and other residents – especially as he had a tendency to steal knives from the kitchen, and threaten both himself and others with them.

“I felt so angry that [this male], who was physically strong and abled bodied was screaming at someone who was physically disabled and psychologically weak. [Lucy] genuinely didn’t know what was going on,” Jane says, describing that the incident had been rattling enough that afterwards, staff went around the residence and asked the women if they were alright.

Jane describes attempts to confide in a shelter staff member about how hearing Max scream at Lucy had brought back childhood trauma related to her father’s abuse. But the staff member quickly express they were more concerned about Jane having perceived Max as male.

“I can’t lie and say it was another sexless person … It wasn’t just the yelling, it was the deep, angry voice.”

“She was very distressed at hearing this. I can’t lie and say it was another sexless person. It was specifically my father. It wasn’t just the yelling, it was the deep, angry voice.”

As a result of the incident, Max was removed from the home, and Jane says that for a period of a few weeks in the summer, conditions in the shelter improved for all residents.

“I did better in the parts of the summer when no males were in the house. There was even a time in the house, the only time this happened actually, when there was a group therapy session with just us as women,” Jane says, “A woman in the house who was constantly undergoing psychosis and could not speak in clear sentences was able to open up about her past trauma.”

Close to the end of the summer, Jane says a second trans-identified male was moved into the shelter, bringing an entirely new dynamic, and a new set of concerns for Jane.

Sam* had been released into Peggy’s Place from a men’s recovery house, and was only amongst the women briefly before being shuttled away for a full vaginoplasty after which point he was returned. Jane describes feeling “horrified” as she witnessed someone who was mentally unstable be ‘affirmed’ through a major, body-altering surgery.

“This person was unable to think critically. I do not believe they were in a place where they could have meaningfully consented,” Jane says, “Part of me was hoping or assuming that someone, somewhere in the line of [medical professionals] would have said ‘stop,’ but no one had.”

Jane, who has her own trauma associated with abuses within the medical system, says witnessing the pain and unawareness Sam was experiencing made her feel like he was being subjected to “torture,” and could only recall it through fits of uncontrollable sobbing.

“One night, Sam agreed with me about having needed more questioning before getting the surgery. At one point, [he] said ‘if I had known, I might not have done it.’ To admit that involves being cognizant of a violation that in my opinion is on par with some of the most violent sexual assault because it is literally physically cutting up and hurting the sexual organs.” Jane also notes that Sam had shown her a stack of paperwork he’d been given to read and sign prior to his surgeries, but says Sam only had a Grade 5 education and was blind in one eye.

Jane notes that Sam’s post-surgery care became a central focus of the shelter, leaving many of the women fighting to access bathrooms, or being exposed to things they did not have the capacity to cope with. After her last experience, Jane felt frightened to talk to staff about the impact it was having on her own mental health.

“[Sam] was in so much pain for so many months,” Jane says, “There were specific smells of blood and rot in the bathroom. Things indicative of infection and pain. Things I don’t want to remember.”

When Sam was struggling with an infection in his genitals, he went to Jane for help researching at-home treatments and vitamins. Jane says it was a turning point in her understanding of the gender identity issue, which she had only briefly given attention to after Max had been in the house.

“I came across Trans Care BC website, which was horrifying. It read more like an advertisement than a resource for serious medical information. There was nothing about infections or vitamins. Nothing.” Jane felt the information on the website was almost a “conflict of interest,” with all of the resources telling patients to speak to their surgeons.

“The surgeon makes a living off of giving the procedures, not off of counseling people and figuring out what is best for them. It was criminal that this happened to [Sam] in my opinion.”

As Jane continued to research into issues surrounding gender identity, she quickly became overwhelmed with the realization that what she had experienced in the shelter was not isolated, but rather part of a rapidly expanding problem.

“Everything was surreal. Just surreal. It’s such a horrible and shocking problem. You’re supposed to be working on yourself and all I did was curl up into a little ball and sleep all day,” Jane says, “I was also someone who cared. Other’s found it easier to not care.”

In July of 2020, Jane was informed she was being evicted from the shelter as a result of her increasingly vocal concerns about gender ideology both inside and outside of the house. She was told she had 3 hours to pack her things and find alternative housing, something that was extremely difficult as the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions had resulted in limited available services.

Jane provided Reduxx with a series of recordings she had made while attempting to engage with staff on her issues. In one, she is heard speaking with the manager of the shelter as she was being evicted.

“We are a trans-friendly house. We will be having more trans women coming in. So the decision has been made that this is not the right place for you,” the manager says, before accusing Jane of being “dishonest” about her position on trans rights during her intake.

“I am really clear about asking people before they move in — you needed to be honest and say you weren’t comfortable with transgender people, and then we wouldn’t have done all this. You wouldn’t have moved in… I felt like we were misinformed.”

The manager then tells Jane she should call Vancouver Rape Relief, which she had labeled as having the same “fears about trans people” as Jane did. Vancouver Rape Relief, Canada’s oldest rape crisis shelter, was stripped of city funding in 2019 after asserting it had a right to cater to females only. Jane told Reduxx she had previously attempted to volunteer at Rape Relief after she had become more interested in gender ideology and witnessed their struggle against the city. She said she’d found the prospect of going there as a resident to be embarrassing after she’d already applied to volunteer.

“There’s only two things going on: You’re transphobic, and this is a trans-friendly agency.”

“The fact is, you’re transphobic. We are a non-transphobic agency, and it is not appropriate for you to be living here,” the manager is heard saying, “I asked you when you moved in and you lied — you said you weren’t transphobic.”

Jane then is heard crying, and trying to insist her views had only recently changed, to which the manager responds: “There’s only two things going on: You’re transphobic, and this is a trans-friendly agency.”

Jane was removed from the house and sent to a facility with a 30 day time limit. Her experience rapidly became one of scrambling to find a new place to live without having to return to her sexually abusive ex-boyfriend.

In November of 2020, after settling into a more stable place, Jane tried writing BC Housing multiple times to file a formal complaint against Peggy’s Place, but was repeatedly bumped back to internal complaint processes within The Kettle Society, the organization which oversees the shelter.

Throughout 2021 and even into 2022, Jane tried reaching someone at BC Housing, and she showed Reduxx multiple chains of emails she’d sent detailing the lack of care from staff towards her concerns, as well as the exact incidents she’d experienced in the shelter.

By May of 2022, Jane still hadn’t received any response from BC Housing, and says she resorted to “begging” for someone to respond, and had an emotional breakdown while trying to contact Ali Ayala-Davidson, an operations manager for BC Housing’s Women’s Transition Housing & Supports Program division.

“There is no help,” Jane wrote in her last email, “Just say I am worthless. Say women are worthless. Say they are. Say they are nothing. Say they are only as good as a male whose dream they can be a prop in. Say that by saying nothing.”

Jane describes being burdened with feelings of guilt and shame related to not having spoken out about her experiences sooner, but it was witnessing the escalation of gender ideology’s impact on women that convinced her she had to take a stand.

“I was in a women’s only space. Women’s only spaces in Canada are now unisex. Most people don’t know or believe it,” Jane says, expressing some degree of disbelief at her own situation, “Women deserve better … How are women supposed to heal from sexual violence when they are forced to pretend sex isn’t real?”

Jane says she considered going to a Human Rights Tribunal, but feared she wouldn’t be able to keep her composure.

“I feel that even if I do send a human rights complaint, I’m going to be so upset they won’t take me seriously and just throw me out,” Jane says, “My time is also almost up at my current residence, and I am searching for new housing … but I struggle with agoraphobia, and find it difficult to organize myself.”

She is currently in the process of seeking a lawyer who might take on her case for reduced-to-no cost as she has limited resources, but has been unsuccessful so far.

Reduxx reached out to The Kettle Society for comment, but did not get a response prior to publication. This article may be updated in the event one is received.

* Names changed to protect the privacy of the individuals mentioned.


Reduxx is a 100% reader funded source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. This Exclusive was made possible by the generosity of our supports. Help us platform more stories and get behind our mission by joining our Patreon. Or, consider making a one-time donation through cryptocurrency or PayPal.

Mujer es desalojada de refugio para víctimas de maltrato luego de criticar políticas pro trans

Una mujer canadiense denunció que fue forzosamente expulsada de un refugio tras informarle a la gerencia de dos hechos perturbadores ocurridos dentro de la residencia ligados a la ideología de género .

Hablando exclusivamente para Reduxx, Jane* dijo que nunca había pensado mucho en la temática de identidad de género antes de mudarse a Peggy’s Place, un refugio para mujeres localizado en un vecindario suburbano de Vancouver, Columbia Británica, que atiende a mujeres que padecen de enfermedades mentales y también han sido víctimas de violencia doméstica.

“Antes de llegar, nunca había pensado ni me había preocupado mucho por la identidad de género”, agregó, reflexionando sobre el período previo a su colocación en el refugio. Después de huir de una situación de violencia doméstica y experimentar dificultades para contar con atención médica inmediata, Jane relata que inicialmente se sintió aliviada cuando su trabajador social le informó que le había conseguido una habitación en el refugio durante mayo del 2019.

“Era una puerta que podía cerrar con llave. Era una habitación privada para mí. Tenía lo que necesitaba a mi alcance.” Jane describe como le preguntaron al momento de admisión si se sentía cómoda estando rodeada de personas identificadas como trans. Ella explicó que había trabajado y socializado con personas identificadas como trans sin problemas en el pasado y que no tenía problemas con ellos, así que dijo que sí.

“Supuse que habría una posibilidad muy pequeña de que uno de ellos estuviese residenciado allí , pero pensé que habría algún tipo de proceso de selección y no existiría ninguna violación a nuestra privacidad”.

Pero poco tiempo después de mudarse, Jane descubrió que un hombre identificado como trans estaba viviendo en la residencia, y rápidamente se dio cuenta que sus suposiciones estaban erradas.

Jane dijo que al principio, solo trató de evitar a Max*, a quien describió como claramente masculino con más de 6 pies de estatura. Pero apenas unas semanas después de establecerse, Jane recuerda haberlo visto en el pasillo fuera de su habitación, completamente desnudo excepto por un sostén que sostenía contra su pecho mientras modelaba frente a un espejo de cuerpo entero cerca de la puerta del cuarto de Jane. Conservaba sus genitales masculinos y no hacia ningún intento por taparlos.

“DENTRO DE MI MENTE, ME CONGELÉ. SENTÍA MUCHO MIEDO”.

“Me congelé y nunca hice contacto visual directo. Una parte de mí murió. Entré a mi habitación y cerré la puerta con llave”, dijo Jane, “me recordaba a mí misma que tenía una puerta con seguro. Dentro mi mente, me congelé. Sentía mucho miedo”.

Jane afirma que había considerado brevemente regresar a la casa de la que había escapado, pero fue el hecho de que contaba con una puerta con cerradura y una habitación para ella sola lo que le hizo sentir que podía sobrellevar su estadía en el refugio.

Jane intentó quejarse con el personal sobre lo acontecido fuera de su cuarto, pero vio como se le dio poca importancia a su denuncia y sus inquietudes fueron desestimadas.

“Simplemente respondieron ‘algunas personas no respetan los límites’. No se hizo nada. No les importaba que tuviera un trauma sexual”, recuerda, señalando que el intercambio le enseñó que necesitaba guardar silencio.

Poco tiempo después, Max estuvo involucrado en un nuevo incidente con otra residente del refugio.

Jane describe a Lucy* como padeciendo una fuerte discapacidad física y mental además de anorexia hasta el punto de que a menudo no tenía la fuerza para caminar y necesitaba ayuda. Jane continua recordando como Lucy también fue víctima de una diatriba violenta de Max, soportando gritos e insultos por parte del hombre.

“Escuchar a un hombre gritar de esa manera me recordó a mi papá. Si alguien está haciendo un falsete cuando habla, pero luego baja a su octava natural cuando está enojado y gritando, te comunica que hay peligro de una manera realmente instintiva”, explica Jane, señalando que nunca supo lo que había provocado a Max, pero el alboroto había creado inquietud entre el personal y las otras residentes, especialmente porque tenía la costumbre de robar los cuchillos de la cocina y amenazar con atentar contra sí mismo o usarlos contra otras personas.

“Me sentí tan enojada porque este hombre, que era físicamente imponente, le gritaba a alguien que sufría de una discapacidad psicológica y en un estado de debilidad. Lucy realmente no sabía lo que estaba pasando”, dijo Jane, recordando que el incidente había sido tan estremecedor que luego de lo ocurrido, el personal recorrió toda la residencia preguntándoles a las mujeres si se sentían bien.

Jane describe como ella intentó confiarle a un miembro del personal del refugio como el maltrato de Max hacia Lucy le había despertado un trauma infantil relacionado con los abusos de su padre. Pero inmediatamente el miembro de personal contestó que estaban más preocupados de que Jane percibiera a Max como hombre.

“NO PUEDO MENTIR Y DECIR QUE FUE OTRA PERSONA SIN SEXO… NO ERA SOLO EL GRITO, ERA LA VOZ PROFUNDA Y ENOJADA”.

“Ella se veía muy angustiada mientras recibía los gritos. No puedo mentir y decir que era otra persona sin sexo. Fue ver a mi padre. No fueron solo los gritos, fue la voz profunda y enojada”.

Como resultado del incidente, expulsaron a Max de la casa y Jane agrega que durante algunas semanas en el verano, las condiciones en el refugio mejoraron para todas las residentes.

“Me fue mejor durante el verano cuando no habían hombres en el refugio. Incluso hubo un día en la casa, la única vez en realidad, durante una sesión de terapia grupal en la que solo estábamos nosotras”, recordó Jane, “Una residente que sufría constantemente de ataques psicóticos y no podía comunicarse con claridad fue capaz de abrirse y hablar de su trauma pasado”.

Cerca del final del verano, Jane cuenta que un segundo hombre identificado como trans fue trasladado al refugio, lo que trajo una nueva dinámica y un nuevo conjunto de preocupaciones para Jane.

Sam* había sido dado de alta para Peggy’s Place desde una casa de descanso para hombres, y solo estuvo con las mujeres por un corto periodo antes de ser trasladado para una vaginoplastia completa, después de la cual fue devuelto. Jane recuerda como se sintió “horrorizada” al presenciar que una persona mentalmente inestable se ‘afirmaba’ a través de cirugías de modificación corporal.

“Esta persona no podía pensar críticamente. No creo que estuviera en capacidad de dar su consentimiento ”, dijo Jane, “Una parte de mí esperaba o asumía que alguien, en algún punto de la línea de profesionales médicos hubiese dicho ‘basta, suficiente’, pero nadie lo hizo.”

Jane, que tiene su propio trauma asociado con los abusos dentro del sistema médico, dijo que presenciar el dolor y la inconsciencia que sufría Sam la hizo sentir como si estuviera siendo sometida a una “tortura”, y solo podía recordarlo en medio de sollozos incontrolables.

“Una noche, Sam manifestó estar de acuerdo conmigo en que necesitaba hacer más preguntas antes de someterse a la cirugía. Dijo ‘si lo hubiera sabido, quizás no lo hubiese hecho’. Admitir eso implica estar consciente de que hubo una violación que, en mi opinión, está a la par con las agresiones sexuales más violentas porque se trata literalmente de cortar y lastimar los órganos sexuales”. Jane también señala que Sam le había mostrado una pila de documentos que le habían dado para leer y firmar antes de sus cirugías, pero afirma que Sam solo tenía una educación de 5to grado y era ciego de un ojo.

Jane señala que la atención postoperatoria de Sam se convirtió en el foco central para del refugio, lo que dejó a muchas de las mujeres luchando por acceder a los baños o expuestas a situaciones que no eran capaces de afrontar. Después de su última experiencia, Jane sintió miedo de hablar con el personal sobre el impacto negativo que esto generaba sobre su propia salud mental.

“Sam sufrió de dolor intenso durante muchos meses”, dijo Jane, “Había olor a sangre y podredumbre en el baño. Cosas indicativas de infección y dolor. Cosas que no quiero recordar.

Cuando Sam estaba luchando contra una infección en sus genitales, acudió a Jane en busca de ayuda para investigar tratamientos caseros y vitaminas. Jane afirma que fue un punto de inflexión en su comprensión del problema de la identidad de género, al que solo había prestado atención por un breve instante después de que Max estuvo hospedado en la casa.

“Encontré el sitio web de Trans Care BC, fue horrible. Se veía más como un anuncio comercial que como un recurso de información médica seria. No había nada sobre infecciones o vitaminas. Nada en absoluto.” Jane sintió que la información del sitio web era casi un “conflicto de intereses”, ya que todos los recursos le sugerían a los pacientes que hablaran con sus cirujanos.

“El cirujano se gana la vida llevando a cabo los procedimientos, no asesorando a las personas y averiguando qué es lo mejor para ellos. En mi opinión fue un acto criminal que esto le sucediera a Sam”.

Mientras Jane continuaba investigando sobre cuestiones relacionadas con la identidad de género, rápidamente se sintió abrumada al darse cuenta de que lo que había experimentado en el refugio no era un caso aislado, sino parte de un problema que se expandía rápidamente.

“Todo fue tan surreal. Simplemente surreal. Es un problema tan impactante y horrible. Se supone que debes estar trabajando en ti misma y todo lo que hice fue acurrucarme en forma de una pequeña pelota para dormir todo el día”, recordaba  Jane, “también era una persona a quien le daba mucha importancia a esto. A las otras les resultó mucho más fácil descartarlo”.

En julio del 2020, le informaron a Jane que iban a desalojarla del refugio como consecuencia de su enfoque y rechazo cada vez más expreso hacia la ideología de género tanto dentro como fuera del albergue. Le dijeron que tenía 3 horas para empacar todas sus cosas y encontrar otra vivienda , algo que era extremadamente difícil ya que las restricciones por la pandemia de COVID-19 limitaban drásticamente sus opciones.

Jane le  proporcionó a Reduxx una serie de grabaciones que había hecho mientras intentaba hablar con el personal sobre sus dificultades. En uno, se la escucha hablar con el administrador del albergue mientras la desalojaban.

“Somos una casa trans-friendly. Tendremos más mujeres trans. Así que se ha tomado la decisión de que no es el lugar adecuado para ti”, dijo el gerente, antes de acusar a Jane de ser “deshonesta”sobre su posición sobre los derechos de las personas trans durante su proceso de admisión.

“Soy muy claro con las preguntas para la gente que quiere mudarse: tenías que ser honesta y decir que no te sentías cómoda con personas transgénero, y así no estaríamos haciendo todo esto. No te habrías mudado… Siento que fuimos mal informados”.

Luego, el gerente le dijo a Jane que debería llamar al Vancouver Rape Relief, que ella misma había etiquetado como manteniendo los mismos “temores sobre las personas trans” que manifestaba Jane. Vancouver Rape Relief, el refugio de crisis por violación más antiguo de Canadá, fue despojado del apoyo monetario de la ciudad en el 2019 después de mantener su posición de que tenía el derecho a solo atender a mujeres. Jane le reveló a Reduxx que anteriormente había intentado ser voluntaria en Rape Relief después de que se interesara aun más en la ideología de género y fue testigo de como lucho contra la ciudad. Ella dijo sentirse avergonzada con la idea de ir allá como residente después de haberse ofrecido como voluntaria.

“SOLO HAY DOS COSAS AQUÍ: ERES TRANSFÓBICA Y ESTA ES UNA AGENCIA AMIGA DE LAS PERSONAS TRANS”.

 “El hecho es que eres transfóbica. Somos una agencia no transfóbica y no es apropiado que vivas aquí”, se le escucha decir al gerente: “Te pregunté cuándo te mudaste y mentiste: dijiste que no eras transfóbica”.

Luego se le oye a Jane llorando e insistiendo que sus puntos de vista solo habían cambiado recientemente, a lo que el gerente responde: “Solo pasan dos cosas aquí: eres transfóbica y esta es una agencia amiga de las personas trans”.

Jane fue expulsada del refugio y enviada a una instalación con un tiempo límite de 30 días. Su experiencia rápidamente se convirtió en una lucha por encontrar un nuevo lugar en donde vivir sin tener que volver con su ex novio y agresor sexual.

En noviembre del 2020, después de llegar a un lugar más estable, Jane escribió varias veces a BC Housing para presentar una queja formal contra Peggy’s Place, pero repetidamente se vio relegada a procesos de quejas internas dentro de The Kettle Society, la organización que supervisa el refugio.

A lo largo del 2021 e incluso en el 2022, Jane intentó comunicarse con alguien en BC Housing y le proporcionó a Reduxx varias cadenas de correos electrónicos que había enviado detallando la falta de atención por parte del personal frente a sus preocupaciones, así como los detalles exactos de los incidentes que había vivido en el refugio.

Para mayo del 2022, Jane todavía no había recibido ninguna respuesta de BC Housing y dijo que tuvo que recurrir a “rogar” a que alguien le respondiera y sufrió un colapso emocional luego de intentar contactar a Ali Ayala-Davidson, gerente de operaciones de BC Housing División del Programa de Apoyo y Vivienda de Transición para Mujeres.

“No hay ayuda”, escribió Jane en su último correo electrónico, “Solo di que no valgo nada. Di que las mujeres no valemos nada. Di lo que son. Di que no son nada. Di que solo son tan buenas como para servir de apoyo para los sueños de los hombres. Dilo sin decir nada.

Jane describe sentirse agobiada por sentimientos de culpa y vergüenza relacionados con el no haber contado sus experiencias antes de esta entrevista , pero presenciar el creciente impacto de la ideología de género en las mujeres fue lo que la convenció de que tenía que tomar posición.

“Estaba en un espacio solo para mujeres. Los espacios exclusivos para mujeres en Canadá ahora son unisex. La mayoría de la gente no lo sabe ni lo cree”, explica Jane, expresando cierto grado de incredulidad ante su propia situación. “Las mujeres se merecen algo mejor… ¿Cómo se supone que las mujeres van a curarse de la violencia sexual cuando se ven obligadas a fingir que el sexo no es real? ”

Jane dice que consideró ir a un Tribunal de Derechos Humanos, pero temía no poder mantener la compostura.

“Siento que incluso si envío una queja sobre derechos humanos, me enfadaré tanto que no me tomarán en serio y simplemente me echarán”, dijo Jane, “También el tiempo se agota en mi residencia actual. , y estoy buscando una nueva vivienda… pero lucho contra la agorafobia y me resulta difícil organizarme”.

Actualmente está en el proceso de búsqueda de un abogado que pueda hacerse cargo de su caso por un costo reducido o gratuito, ya que tiene recursos limitados, pero hasta ahora no ha contado con éxito.

Reduxx contactó a The Kettle Society para recibir sus declaraciones, pero no obtuvo respuesta antes de la publicación de este articulo. Se actualizará en caso de recibir un nuevo comunicado.

* Se cambiaron los nombre para proteger la privacidad de las personas involucradas.


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes! Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon.