Home Blog Page 152

Reino Unido: Mujer agredida por activista transgénero en evento feminista

Imágenes que fueron tomadas en un evento feminista en el Reino Unido se viralizaron luego de que un activista trans fuera grabado agrediendo físicamente a una mujer. El atacante formaba parte de una banda de uniformados de negro que impedía que las feministas se acercaran a la estatua de la sufragista Emmeline Pankhurst.

En el día de hoy el Manchester Speakers’ Corner organizó una manifestación en apoyo a los derechos de la mujer liderada por la feminista crítica Kellie-Jay Keen, también conocida como Posie Parker. El evento, una manifestación pacífica de mujeres y aliadas feministas en defensa de los derechos sexuales de las féminas, fue saboteado por el grupo activista Trans Rise Up de Manchester.

La organización envió a varios “guardias de seguridad” vestidos de negro para vandalizar los accesos a la estatua de la sufragista Emmeline Pankhurst, cubriéndola con cintas y banderas alusivas al movimiento transgénero, y también impidiendo que las activistas feministas pudieran acercarse al lugar.

Durante el evento, una solitaria feminista se acercó a la estatua, aparentemente con la intención de colocar a sus pies una bandera con los colores del movimiento sufragista. Pero las imágenes tomadas muestran a la mujer siendo maltratada físicamente por los activistas trans.

En el video, que tiene casi 100,000 visitas al momento de escribir este artículo, se puede ver a la victima intentando mantener a distancia a un hombre particularmente agresivo.

El hombre la agarra por los brazos y el pecho, e incluso le golpea las muñecas mientras ella trata de mantener sus brazos extendidos para alejarlo. Más de 10 segundos después de la agresión, otro activista trans logra convencer al hombre de negro a que deje de manosear a la mujer.

Poco después, se ven a los funcionarios policiales entrar en el círculo de concreto que rodea a la estatua, uno de los cuales se detiene para hablar con la víctima, pero aparentemente no se tomaron medidas contra el sujeto que la agarró y abofeteó.

En declaraciones ofrecidas a Reduxx, la defensora de los derechos de la mujer Kellie-Jay Keen fustigó las acciones de los revoltosos de negro, comparándolos a niños con rabietas

“Los hombres mimados no pueden resistir actuar como mimados”, dijo, “Sus berrinches de niños pequeños no son tan lindos cuando llegan a la adultez. Son intimidantes, agresivos y violentos”.

Keen es conocida por su campaña Standing for Women, que se enfoca en garantizar que el lenguaje que rodea los problemas femeninos se articule claramente para que los derechos femeninos basados en el sexo no se vean erosionados por la ideología de género.

Con relación a los activistas que atacaron a la mujer manifestante, Keen concluyó: “Hombres así no pueden soportar la carga de la responsabilidad de sus vidas miserables, por lo que culpan a las mujeres, y para algunos, toda mujer es culpable”.

Las payasadas de los activistas llamaron la atención de la autora de Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling, quien citó y retuiteó otro video que muestra imágenes de la “seguridad” negándose a permitir que el presentador de podcast Stephen Knight se acercara a la estatua, que se encuentra en un espacio público.

Los videos tomados en el evento rápidamente ganaron la atención y rechazo del público. Muchos notaron la aparente ironía de que los activistas trans se negaran a permitir que las manifestantes feministas preocupadas por la situación de las mujeres se acercaran a la estatua de una defensora del feminismo.

“No estoy seguro de poder perdonar a las personas que apoyan a este movimiento”, escribió el YouTuber @cbucksrules en Twitter, “¿Cómo puedes creer que estás del lado correcto de la historia cuando tu gente es anónima y violenta hacia las mujeres? ”

Otros se mostraron incrédulos de que la policía no interviniera en favor de la mujer agredida.

“La policía observa a una mujer siendo agredida, ignora al atacante prefiriendo regañar a la victima. Increíble.” El usuario de Twitter Andrew Dowd escribió en respuesta al video.

Otro usuario notó que la escena se parecía mucho a una foto que mostraba la imagen de la estatua, Emmeline Pankhurst, siendo maltratada por la policía mientras luchaba por el sufragio femenino.

Esta no es la primera vez que activistas trans atacan violentamente a manifestaciones feministas.

El año pasado, Francia fue un semillero de violencia antifeminista, con Résistance Lesbienne y otros grupos feministas franceses informando sobre varios eventos que fueron interrumpidos por activistas trans.

En julio de 2021, Get The L Out UK hizo circular imágenes que mostraban a manifestantes lesbianas siendo agredidas físicamente por activistas trans durante el Orgullo de París por protestar contra los hombres que se identifican con el lesbianismo. Meses antes, un grupo de mujeres que se reunió para manifestar en contra del comercio sexual frente una estatua del Palacio de la República y recibieron ataques con huevos y aerosol rojo en los ojos.

Más tarde, la estatua donde se dio el incidente fue pintada con aerosol con palabras que se traducen como “salva a una persona trans, mata a un TERF”.

En España, una efigie cadavérica de la entonces Vicepresidenta del Gobierno Carmen Calvo fue colgada de un árbol en la Plaza 8 de Marzo de Compostela, una referencia al Día Internacional de la Mujer y una advertencia antes de los eventos a favor de la mujer que tendrían lugar allí.


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes! Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon

NZ: Trans-Identified Male Behind Stabbing Attack at Indian Restaurant

PHOTO: CHRISTEL YARDLEY/WAIKATO TIMES

The identity of the suspect behind a vicious stabbing attack at an Indian restaurant in Cambridge, New Zealand has been revealed due to a lapse in name suppression.

Matthew Richard Nelson, a male who identifies as a woman named Emma, appeared in Hamilton District Court on May 5. Nelson’s name had previously been withheld from the public, but has now been revealed as the case has gone to court and name suppression has not been re-applied.

Nelson is accused of stabbing three victims with a knife at the Sahara India Restaurant on May 4. One of the victims, a female, was Nelson’s former partner. A police summary of the incident that was presented to the Hamilton District Court said the attacker acted in a “quick and aggressive manner.”

Nelson had entered through the rear door of the Indian restaurant and stabbed a male staff member in the shoulder as he worked in the kitchen.

Another worker, a female, has been confirmed as Nelson’s ex-partner. Nelson slashed her in the face and stabbed her in the upper back, causing her to suffer a punctured lung. She is currently hospitalized at Waikato Hospital in critical condition, with reports stating she has blood in her chest cavity.

A customer who attempted to intervene and save the two was similarly attacked, losing over a liter of blood after he sustained an injury to his abdomen.

Nelson then grabbed a chair, which he used to smash the restaurant’s front windows, and fled.

While being forensically swabbed in police custody by a doctor, Nelson is alleged to have remarked: “this is a bit excessive for only stabbing three people.”

Details on the motive for the attack are not currently known.

Nelson is charged with three counts of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, and one of causing willful damage. He has yet to enter his plea and is scheduled to appear in court again on May 18.

In local media coverage, outlets referred to Nelson using ‘she/her’ pronouns, with other sources referring to the attack as being the fault of a ‘woman.’


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

UK: Trans-Identified Pedophile Blames ‘Male’ Self for Offending

Carlisle Crown Court

A U.K. sex offender who identifies as transgender has been caught with extreme pornographic images which depict the rape of children in an “explicit and realistic way.”

On March 17, Carlisle Crown Court heard how Jasmine Challands, 46, whose birth name is Peter James Challands, hid two mass-storage USB devices in a box of Legos. Investigators discovered the devices and the child sexual abuse materials they contained during a routine inspection for compliance to a sexual harm prevention order, which included an obligation to inform police about any digital storage devices.

In an interview with police at the time of his arrest on March 16, Challands blamed his “former” male self for the offending, saying, “Peter was responsible for them.” Challands emphasized that Peter, rather than Jasmine, had “bad” things on the USB devices which reflected fantasies of sexually abusing children.

Challands’ defense attorney, Jeff Smith, told the court that his client no longer wished to be a man and was beginning a transition process. Magistrates were told that Challands is a “tortured” individual who is now struggling with his identity.

“[He] tells me this will take 10 to 11 years,” said the lawyer. “So [he] is tortured, regarded by no one, and respected by no one. [He’s] said to me in the cells that [he] doesn’t know who [he] is, what [he] is, where [he’s] going, or where [he] belongs.”

Challands had been a registered sex offender since 2019, when he was previously convicted for making and possessing animated child sexual abuse images. Official court records detail that within the five allegations against Challands of possessing child sexual abuse materials there were over 10,000 indecent images. Some of the media met the standard to be classified as ‘category A,’ the most severe form of child sexual exploitation image which includes penetrative sex, sexual activity with an animal, and/or sadism.

At the time, Challands had spent on remand the equivalent of a 14-month jail sentence, but was freed in 2020 under the condition of a five-year sexual harm prevention order. He was released despite having admitted to four new charges: failing to comply with Sex Offender Registration rules, twice breaching a court order to prevent offending, and failing to tell police that he had a computer flash-drive device.

Challands protested his own release, saying he felt safe in jail. Mark Shepherd, representing him in 2020, said: “He clearly wishes to remain in prison and finds comfort within the prison system far greater than he felt in the community.”

However, Judge Nicholas Barker said continuing to jail Challands would not offer any form of “protective package” to the public. “Prisons are not there to house vulnerable individuals,” said Judge Barker. “They are there as centers of punishment and to control risk.”

The judge imposed a three year community order, with 20 days of rehabilitation and a Sex Offenders’ treatment program. Challands was also given a five year Sexual Harm Prevention Order and put on the Sex Offenders’ Register for the same period.

Challands is currently remanded to Durham Prison and has yet to enter a plea regarding the new charges against him. His case will be heard in Carlisle Crown Court on May 16.

Local media News and Star referred to Challands as a “woman” and did not reference his self-declared gender identity in their most recent news report concerning current charges.

Challands’ bizarre claims bear some similarity to those of U.S. serial killer Donna Perry.

Born Douglas Robert Perry, the sadistic killer murdered three prostituted women in a four-month timeframe in 1990. During his trial for the slayings, Perry referred to his “male” and “female” identities in separate contexts, accusing his “male” side of having committed the crimes while his “female” identity was innocent of them.


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

Disgraced Instructor Who Called Pedophiles “Minor Attracted People” Hired at Child Safeguarding Center

A Johns Hopkins-affiliated public research center is facing backlash after hiring an instructor who was forced to resign from their University after defending the “dignity” of “minor attracted people,” and entertaining theories about giving pedophiles “high quality child pornography.”

On May 12, the Moore Center for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse announced that disgraced Old Dominion University instructor Allyn Walker would be joining the Center as a postdoctoral fellow.

Walker, a female-to-male transgender who identifies as non-binary, was the subject of widespread controversy last year after she sat down for an interview with Prostasia – a registered 503c which many have called “pro-pedophile” for their stances on legalizing child-like sex dolls and routinely comparing pedophilia to a sexuality.

Walker was an assistant professor of sociology and criminal justice at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, and had interviewed with Prostasia’s now-defunct podcast in November to promote her book titled “A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity.”

In the interview, Walker stated she used the term “minor attracted people” out of consideration for pedophile’s feelings, noting “… I think it’s important to use terminology for groups that members of that group want others to use for them.” She also stated that “MAP advocacy groups like B4U-Act have advocated for use of the term, and they’ve advocated for it primarily because it’s less stigmatizing than other terms like pedophile.”

While Walker initially noted in the interview that she was not seeking to answer the question of whether or not she considered pedophilia a sexual orientation, her later comments suggest she did place it on a similar spectrum.

“… on one hand, just because someone has attractions to children, doesn’t mean that they will never experience attraction to adults as well, or even that their attractions to children will persist for their entire lives.” She said, “Sexuality can be fluid, and there are many MAPs who have a range of attractions to both children and adults.”

At another point in the interview, Walker stated she “sort of empathize[s]” with pedophiles because of identifying as Queer.

Word of Walker’s interview with Prostasia spread like wildfire, with many expressing outrage that a University instructor was portraying pedophilia in a sympathetic light.  Copies of Walker’s PhD dissertation quickly began to circulate, showing Walker had entertained theories regarding allowing pedophiles to access “high quality child pornography” in belief it may reduce offending.

The backlash was so severe that Old Dominion University President Brian O. Hemphill was forced to issue a statement just days after the interview was released, and soon after placed Walker on administrative leave. On November 26, a joint statement issued by ODU announced that Walker was resigning from ODU. In it, Walker blamed media as well as transphobia for “mischaracterizing” her work.

Speaking with Reduxx, Dr. Alaric Naudé called Walker’s new position “insane.”

Dr. Naudé is a Professor focused on social sciences and linguistics at Suwon University in South Korea. In February, he had his research on Prostasia removed from The British Journal of Sociology and History just 24 hours after it was first published after the organization pushed the Journal to remove it.

The article, titled A Case Study via Sociolinguistic Analysis of [a] Covert Pro-Pedophilia Organization Registered as a Child Protection Charity, focused on how Prostasia claimed to be for child protection but built a narrative framing pedophiles as victims of “an oppressive social structure.” Dr. Naudé found that many organizations “claiming to want to protect children” had “linguistic markers [denoting] that something else was their intention.”

Dr. Naudé emphasized how the Moore Center’s partnership with Walker demonstrated a microcosm of a much larger issue.

“The example of Dr. Walker being welcomed along with her ideology to the Moore Center is a piece of a puzzle. The parts of the puzzle continue to come together to give us a clearer picture of the pro-pedophilia agenda being pushed by an unholy triad of academia, psychology associations and pseudo-child protection groups,” Dr. Naudé asserted.

“The façade of safe guarding and child protection that fosters pedophilia as a sexuality is now becoming a perverse parody which if left will eventually result in pedophiles becoming a protected group. This will be a disaster for decades of work attempting to eradicate the pestilence of child abuse in society,” Dr. Naudé said.

Last fall, while Walker’s views were being lambasted by the media, director of the Moore Center Elizabeth Letourneau published an op-ed in The Washington Post defending her. In the op-ed, Letourneau states she also prefers ‘minor attracted person’ to ‘pedophile.’

The Moore Center for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse is affiliated with the John Hopkins medical establishment, which has a long history of endorsing theories related to child sexuality in addition to promoting transsexual surgeries.

John Money, who coined the term “gender identity,” was a sexologist and psychologist who founded the Gender Identity Clinic at Johns Hopkins University in 1966 and started an extensive research program on the medical treatment of sexual paraphilias and on “sex reassignment” procedures.

Dr. Fred Berlin, a controversial psychiatrist who was mentored by Money, had a clinic within Johns Hopkins until the mid-1990s. Berlin is infamously known for protesting against a law that required mental health professionals to alert police when they were aware a client was actively sexually abusing a child.

Berlin managed to gain an exemption to that mandatory reporting law for his clients for a period of time, something which sparked outrage amongst child safeguarding groups.


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

ACLU Claims “Males, Females” Do Not Exist: Court Docs

The American Civil Liberties Union is intervening in a lawsuit launched by four female inmates who were subjected to abuse at the hands of trans-identified male transfers. In the intervention, the ACLU claims that human beings are “not sexually dimorphic,” and that males have no biological differences from females.

In November of 2021, the Women’s Liberation front (WoLF) launched a lawsuit against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) in response to the state’s transfer of male inmates to women’s prisons. In the suit, WoLF included representation for four female inmates currently incarcerated in the state who had experienced violations of their rights at the hands of male inmates who had been transferred under SB-132, one of which was sexually assaulted by a trans-identified male transfer.

SB-132, or the Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act, went into effect in January of 2021, and allowed male inmates to seek transfer to women’s prisons on the basis of self-declared gender identity. Male inmates did not have to be on hormones, have surgery, be diagnosed with gender dysphoria, or even have legal documents supporting their transgender status in order to gain transfer.

But the ACLU has now filed a motion to intervene in the suit, claiming the state of California cannot adequately represent their interests against WoLF, and that they must join in to defend SB-132.

But in the motion, filed on May 9 in the Fresno District Court, the ACLU not only rejects the details in WoLF’s suit, it also makes some bold assertions — including that “males” and “females” do not exist.

“Proposed Intervenors deny that ‘men as a class’ are defined and differentiated from ‘women as a class’ by their ‘anatomy, genitalia, physical characteristics, and physiology,'” the ACLU writes, going on to state that they “deny the allegation” that there are anatomical, genital, and physical characteristics that differentiate men from women.

The ACLU also claims that human beings are not sexually dimorphic, and there are no reproductive systems, hormones, or chromosomes which result in differences between males and females.

Speaking to Reduxx, WoLF legal director Lauren Adams expressed a mix of confusion and amusement at the ACLU’s claims in the filing. But rather than seeing it as an obstacle, Adams says there is opportunity that bodes well for WoLF’s position.

“The ACLU is suggesting that the state of California is not going to adequately represent their position because some officials don’t agree with the policy… to that, I would say: well, yeah! Once people find out what the policy is, they largely don’t support it,” she says, continuing: “The officials likely recognize they cannot keep women safe while successfully implementing the policy.”

Adams says the ACLU’s intervention may be the result of a concern that the state might be more inclined to protect incarcerated women than trans-identified males.

“I think the fact that the state is even saying that they care about the women’s safety is a threat to the ACLU. They joined in to make sure that there was at least one party in the case that didn’t care about women at all.”

Adams says that the ACLU often leverages their argument for transferring men into women’s institutions on the basis of a claimed risk of victimization while in a men’s institution, something Adams believes opens the door to an argument that they are also at a higher risk of perpetration.

“If you are saying this group has a risk of victimization, we can say the group also has a risk of perpetration. In the federal system, one-third of the substantiated prison rape complaints include a victim who was a sex offender. That is, in fact, the single biggest risk factor of being a victim of prison rape in male prisons.”

Adams notes that, despite ample evidence to the contrary, the ACLU denies that sex offenders were disproportionately represented amongst trans-identified male inmates, a claim that is easy to debunk.

“One-third of the requests for transfer from men’s prisons to women’s prisons include an inmate who had been convicted of a sex offense,” Adams says, noting that the figures are similarly stark in the federal prison system, where 48% of trans-identified male inmates were imprisoned on a sex offense.

“Ultimately what we are dealing with is a complete denial of reality,” Adams says, “The ACLU along with every person on this planet knows what men and women are, and what makes them different. Their denial of this fact in order to validate the identities of male offenders is embarrassing.”

WoLF is expected to file their response to the ACLU’s intervention by May 31.


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

La Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles dice que “Hombres y Mujeres” no existen

La Unión Americana de Libertades Civiles está interviniendo en una demanda presentada por cuatro reclusas sometidas a abusos de hombres identificados como trans que fueron trasladados a su prisión. En la intervención, la ACLU afirma que los seres humanos “no son sexualmente dimórficos”, y que no hay diferencias biológicas entre machos y hembras.

En noviembre de 2021, el Frente de Liberación de la Mujer (WoLF) interpuso una demanda contra el Departamento de Correcciones y Rehabilitación de California (CDCR) en respuesta al traslado de reclusos varones a prisiones de mujeres. En la demanda, WoLF incluyó representación legal para cuatro reclusas actualmente encarceladas en el estado que habían experimentado violaciones de sus derechos a manos de reclusos varones que habían sido transferidos bajo SB-132, una de las cuales fue agredida sexualmente por uno de los prisioneros masculinos que se identifica como trans.

SB-132, o la Ley de Respeto, Agencia y Dignidad Transgénero, entró en vigencia en enero de 2021 y permitió a los reclusos varones solicitar el traslado a prisiones de mujeres basándose en una identidad de género autodeclarada. Los reclusos varones no tenían ni que estar tomando hormonas, someterse a una cirugía, ser diagnosticados con disforia de género o siquiera tener documentos legales que respaldaran su condición de transgénero para obtener el traslado.

Pero la ACLU ahora ha presentado una moción para intervenir en la demanda, alegando que el estado de California no puede representar adecuadamente sus intereses contra WoLF, y que deben unirse para defender la SB-132.

En la moción, presentada el 9 de mayo en el Tribunal de Distrito de Fresno, la ACLU no solo rechaza los detalles en la demanda de WoLF, sino que también hace algunas afirmaciones audaces, incluida la de que los “hombres” y las “mujeres” no existen.

“Los interventores propuestos niegan que los ‘hombres como categoría’ se definan y se diferencien de ‘las mujeres como categoría’ por su ‘anatomía, genitales, características físicas y fisiología'”, escribe la ACLU, y continúa afirmando que “niegan la alegación” de que hay características anatómicas, genitales y físicas que diferencian a los hombres de las mujeres.

La ACLU también afirma que los seres humanos no son sexualmente dimórficos, y que no hay sistemas reproductivos, hormonas o cromosomas que resulten en diferencias entre hombres y mujeres.

En declaraciones a Reduxx, la directora legal de WoLF, Lauren Adams, se mostró entre confundida y divertida ante las afirmaciones de la ACLU. Pero en lugar de verlas como un obstáculo, Adams dice que son una oportunidad que promete ser positiva para la posición de WoLF.

“La ACLU está diciendo que el estado de California no va a representar adecuadamente su posición porque algunos funcionarios no están de acuerdo con las normas … a eso, yo diría: ¡pues claro! Una vez que la gente descubra cuál son esas normas, la mayoría no las va a apoyar”, dice, y continúa: “Es probable que los funcionarios reconozcan que no pueden mantener a las mujeres seguras si implementan con éxito dichas normas”.

Adams dice que la intervención de la ACLU puede ser el resultado de su preocupación de que el estado pueda estar más inclinado a proteger a las mujeres encarceladas que a los hombres que se identifican como trans.

“Creo que incluso el hecho de que el estado diga que se preocupa por la seguridad de las mujeres es una amenaza para la ACLU. Se unieron para asegurarse de que hubiera al menos una parte a la que no le importaran las mujeres en absoluto”.

Adams dice que la ACLU, para transferir a hombres a instituciones de mujeres, a menudo usa el argumento de un supuesto riesgo de victimización cuando están en una institución de hombres, algo que Adams cree que abre la puerta al argumento de que también tienen un mayor riesgo de ser ellos los que victiman.

“Si estás diciendo que este grupo tiene un riesgo de victimización, podemos decir que el grupo también tiene un riesgo de victimar. Un tercio de las denuncias probadas por violación en prisión incluyen a una víctima que fue delincuente sexual. Ese es, de hecho, el mayor factor de riesgo de ser víctima de violación en prisión en cárceles masculinas”.

Adams señala que, a pesar de la amplia evidencia de lo contrario, la ACLU niega que los delincuentes sexuales estuvieran desproporcionadamente representados entre los reclusos varones identificados como trans, una afirmación que es fácil de desacreditar.

“Un tercio de las solicitudes de traslado de hombres a prisiones de mujeres son de reclusos condenados por un delito sexual”, dice Adams, señalando que las cifras son igualmente claras en el sistema penitenciario federal, donde el 48% de los reclusos varones identificados como trans fueron encarcelados por un delito sexual.

“En última instancia, lo que estamos viendo es una negación completa de la realidad”, dice Adams, “La ACLU y todo el mundo en este planeta sabe lo que son los hombres y las mujeres, y lo que los hace diferentes. La negación de este hecho para validar las identidades de delincuentes masculinos es vergonzosa”.

Se espera que WoLF presente su respuesta a la intervención de la ACLU antes del 31 de mayo.

Traducción cortesía de Salagre.


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes! Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon.

Viral TikTok Shows The Dark Side of Surrogacy

A US-based woman who entered into a surrogacy arrangement and gave birth to twins last year is now raising the children with her husband after the intended parents cut off contact.

In a TikTok that went viral, wracking up over 4 million views in a matter of days and sparking outrage, the mother, who goes by Amanda, revealed that she had been left to raise twins after the couple she had been a surrogate for never came to retrieve the children she had given birth to, and cut off contact with her.

Amanda had previously been a surrogate and decided to repeat the process. She registered with a surrogacy company that connected her with a couple who lived overseas. She gave birth to twins Hannah and James in February 2021, but the intended parents never arrived to pick them up. 

“They weren’t willing to quarantine for two weeks before entering the US,” Amanda explained.

Yet when COVID-19 restrictions were lifted in November last year, the couple still made no plans to come and take the children.

“I was okay taking care of them for a little while,” she wrote in the comments of her TikTok account. “But days turned into weeks and weeks into months… with no travel progress.”

Initially, the couple was sending money to Amanda and her husband to provide for the babies’ care. But after Amanda asked them not to send money if they had no intentions of taking the children, the intended parents ceased all contact.

In the viral TikTok video, Amanda explained that over 50 days had passed since they heard from the couple, and 14 months since she had given birth. Amanda, whose TikTok handle is @mom_11203, has since locked her account.

“Not only did they not pick up the twins – they never established their parental rights,” she explained.

Currently, both Amanda and her husband are listed as the legal parents on the twins’ birth certificate. The surrogacy contract had detailed that a second birth certificate would be drawn up when the parents arrived to take the infants home.

Amanda and her husband have hired a lawyer and have decided to raise the twins. “We ARE working with a lawyer. Yes, there was a legal contract in place,” Amanda said in a comment. “Our contract states that I am legally bound to give up my rights. But they’re also legally bound to come get their babies.”

She is determined to keep the twins even if the intended parents establish contact again and attempt to pick them up. “I will not give them up without a fight,” she said.

Jennifer Lahl, founder and president of The Center for Bioethics and Culture Network, has combined her experience as a pediatric critical care nurse with her advocacy against the surrogacy industry. She has also produced several documentary films exposing the medical harms involved in the surrogacy process and highlights the personal stories of women who have been harmed.

Speaking with Reduxx, Lahl explained that though she had never spoken with women who had been abandoned by the intended parents, she has often seen cases where the intended parents demanded that the surrogate mother terminate a pregnancy or reduce the number of fetuses she is carrying.

“Never has the surrogate done this, but what they struggle with after giving birth is wondering whatever became of the babies. Did the intended parents keep the babies, give them up for adoption, or keep one but not all. This is more common than intended parents never coming to claim their babies,” Lahl said.

“In some U.S. states, the surrogate mother’s name is on the birth certificate when the baby is born and the intended parents have to go through a legal adoption. But in states like California, New York, and Washington, the surrogate waives her maternal rights at the signing of the contract, before she is even pregnant, and in this case, she would have to go through a formal adoption to legally become the mother of the child.”

Lahl, who has over a decade of experience working with women who were involved in surrogacy contracts and has spoken at the United Nations on the topic, went on to describe why she believes the industry is inherently exploitative.

“The industry, what I call Big Fertility, preys on women’s financial need and sense of altruism to help others have a family. They ignore the risks to women’s health, they groom women ⁠— you aren’t pregnant, you are on a ‘journey’ ⁠— to comply and obey. When things go wrong, they are last in line to help these women,” Lahl says.

“Bottom line, they are selling a product: a healthy baby. Their customer is the wealthy intended parent.”


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission of bringing you uncensored, unfiltered stories by joining our Patreon. Or, consider making a one-time donation.

UK: Trans-Identified Male Jailed After Pleading Guilty to 21 Child Sex Offences

Richard/Rachel Fenton

A man who identifies as a woman has been jailed for 10 years after pleading guilty to using social media to groom children for sexual abuse.

Richard Fenton, who identifies as ‘Rachel,’ has been sentenced to 10 years after pleading guilty to 21 total child sex offenses, including seven counts of attempting to incite a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity. Fenton was also charged on a drug offense.

According to Manchester Evening News, Fenton was originally reported to police in November of 2021 after an anti-predator vigilante group informed law enforcement the had been communicating with a fake social media profile they had established in the likeness of a 12-year-old girl.

Not knowing who was behind the profile and believing it to be a child, Fenton attempted to incite the ‘girl’ into sexual activity, and sent the profile perverted images.

Fenton also tried to encourage the ‘girl’ to engage in sexual activity with a six-year-old. Police soon after arrested him at an address in Wythenshawe on suspicion of attempting to sexually abuse a child, also charging him with marijuana possession.

The 45-year-old man was then released on bail, where be quickly began communicating with yet another fake profile, this one established by law enforcement. The profile was one he believed to belong to a 12-year-old girl, and Fenton sent the account indecent images and encouraged the fake child to engage in sexual activity. Fenton also contacted a third fake profile and engaged in similar behavior.

Fenton was re-arrested in January of 2021 on a total of 21 offenses, to which he pleaded guilty at Manchester Crown Court on Monday. Fenton was also issued a sexual harm prevention order, and made to register as a sex offender.

According to sentencing information, Fenton is listed as a male under his birth name and the court records utilized masculine pronouns for him, which indicates he does not have a gender recognition certificate (GRC). Despite this, many media outlets opted to validate Fenton’s identity, calling him “Rachel,” and utilizing gender-neutral language to address him.

The lack of ‘affirming’ information within court records also suggests Fenton would not be sent to a female prison immediately.

Speaking to Reduxx on the case, Dr. Kate Coleman, Director of Keep Prisons Single Sex, says the primary concern is if Fenton chooses to apply for a GRC and cement his transgender identity in law.

“[GRCs] have successfully been obtained by prisoners serving sentences for the most serious violent and sexual offenses against women and children,” Dr. Coleman says, “We know that offending history and risk are not taken into consideration by the Gender Recognition Panel when making the decision to grant a gender recognition certificate.”

Keep Prisons Single Sex is a campaign group focused on advocating for the single-sex rights of vulnerable female inmates. It currently has branches in the United Kingdom and United States.

Dr. Coleman notes that male inmates serving long sentences may be motivated to begin to fulfill the requires for a GRC and apply.

“What else is there to do?” She asks, pointing out that a GRC would be beneficial if the offender is habitual and knows they are likely to wind up in prison again.

“Whilst under 1% non-GRC holders are in the female [prison] estate, 90% of those with a GRC are in women’s prisons. These include those convicted of the most serious violent and sexual offences and those with intact male genitalia,” Dr. Coleman says, continuing: “A GRC isn’t a cast iron guarantee of getting into a women’s prison, but it increases your chances by an order of magnitude.”

On Fenton, Dr. Coleman says a GRC would possibly be of particular advantage.

“A GRC would confer an additional advantage for this prisoner, which is that he will then be risk assessed only using the risk assessment tools for female offenders. This is significant because he has been convicted of a sexual offense – a GRC would mean that the risk assessment tool designed for use with adult male sexual offenders can never be used with him again.”


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

Trans-Identified Male Charged on 13 Counts of Sexual Abuse of Children

A trans-identified male who pleaded not guilty to attempted child sexual abuse in March is facing additional charges.

Jude ‘Babs’ Longmire, 41, of Billings, Montana, pleaded not guilty last Friday in Yellowstone County District Court to sexual abuse of children, attempted sexual abuse of children, and 11 alternative counts of sexual abuse of children.

On March 15, Longmire was arrested for having been in contact with someone online who he had believed was trafficking a 12-year-old girl for sexual abuse. Longmire attempted to schedule a meeting with the child. Court documents state that during this exchange, Longmire shared a video of a man raping a child.

Longmire also allegedly boasted that he had more child sex abuse material, and in the course of the conversation said that he had an extensive child sexual abuse materials collection which ranged from “really young to mid teens, boys and girls.”

A search warrant was granted to the FBI on March 14. Longmire was placed in custody at Yellowstone County Detention Facility, and federal agents conducted a search of his residence the next day.

Longmire was initially charged with attempted child sex abuse, sexual abuse of children and an alternative count of sexual abuse of children, to which he pleaded not guilty on March 17.

When FBI agents extracted data from Longmire’s cell phone and SD card in April, they recovered more than 100 images and videos of actual and computer-generated child sex abuse material.

Data from Longmire’s electronic devices suggested that he had been sending the images and videos to others from the period of late January through early March, with authorities alleging he shared the child sexual abuse materials at least 10 times.

Babs Longmire. Photo Credit: Yellowstone County Detention Facility.

According to the most recent police documents, Longmire is alleged to also have told one of those recipients in February that in the upcoming weeks, he was planning on raping a 12-year-old girl.

In light of the new information uncovered by investigators last month, charges against Longmire were amended from one count alleging he shared a video of a child being raped to 11 counts of sexual abuse of children, accusing him of possessing and distributing child sex abuse material, bringing the total count of charges to 13.

If convicted of distributing child sex abuse material, Longmire could face a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole for the first 25 years.

He is currently in custody at Yellowstone County Detention Facility on a $250,000 bond.

Media reports on Longmire’s crime referred to him by ‘she/her’ pronouns, and did not mention he was transgender. But Longmire prominently features photos of himself and the transgender flag on his Facebook, and declared he had started hormone replacement therapy in 2018 on his Instagram.


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

Hombre que se dice trans acusado de 13 cargos de abuso sexual de niños.

Un hombre que se dice trans y que se declaró inocente de intento de abuso sexual infantil en marzo, es acusado de otros crímenes.

Jude ‘Babs’ Longmire, de 41 años, de Billings, Montana, se declaró inocente el viernes pasado en el Tribunal de Distrito del Condado de Yellowstone de abuso sexual de menores, intento de abuso sexual de menores y 11 cargos alternativos de abuso sexual de menores.

El 15 de marzo, Longmire fue arrestado por haber estado en contacto con alguien en línea que él creía que estaba traficando a una niña de 12 años para su abuso sexual. Longmire intentó hacer una cita con la niña. Los documentos del tribunal indican que durante este intercambio, Longmire compartió un video de un hombre violando a un menor.

Longmire también supuestamente se jactó de que tenía más material de abuso sexual infantil, y en el curso de la conversación dijo que tenía una extensa colección de materiales de abuso sexual infantil que iba desde “realmente joven hasta adolescentes, niños y niñas”.

Se le dio una orden de registro al FBI el 14 de marzo. Longmire fue puesto bajo custodia en el Centro de Detención del Condado de Yellowstone, y los agentes federales realizaron un registro de su residencia al día siguiente.

Longmire fue acusado en un principio de intento de abuso sexual infantil, abuso sexual de menores y un cargo alternativo de abuso sexual de menores, del que se declaró inocente el 17 de marzo.

Cuando los agentes del FBI extrajeron datos del móvil y de la tarjeta SD de Longmire en abril, recuperaron más de 100 imágenes y videos de material de abuso sexual infantil real y generado por ordenador.

Los datos de los dispositivos electrónicos de Longmire sugirieron que había estado enviando esas imágenes y videos a otras personas desde finales de enero hasta principios de marzo, y las autoridades alegaron que compartió los materiales de abuso sexual infantil al menos 10 veces.

Babs Longmire. Crédito de la foto: Centro de detención del condado de Yellowstone.

Según los documentos policiales más recientes, Longmire le había dicho a una de esas personas en febrero que en las próximas semanas planeaba violar a una niña de 12 años.

A la luz de la nueva información descubierta por los investigadores el mes pasado, los cargos contra Longmire fueron enmendados de un cargo de compartir un video de un niño siendo violado, a 11 cargos de abuso sexual de niños, acusándolo de poseer y distribuir material de abuso sexual infantil, elevando el número total de cargos a 13.

Si es declarado culpable de distribuir material de abuso sexual infantil, Longmire podría enfrentarse a una sentencia de cadena perpetua sin la posibilidad de libertad condicional durante los primeros 25 años.

Actualmente está bajo custodia en el Centro de Detención del Condado de Yellowstone con una fianza de $ 250,000.

Los informes de los medios sobre el crimen de Longmire se referían a él con pronombres femeninos, y no mencionaban que era transgénero. Pero Longmire tiene puestas fotos de sí mismo y de la bandera transgénero en su página de Facebook, y declaró que había comenzado la terapia hormonal en 2018 en su cuenta de Instagram.

Traducción cortesía de Salagre.


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes!Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon