Home Blog Page 139

JAPAN: Gender Counselors Hired to Convince Female Students to Accept Trans-Identified Males

Female students at a women’s university in Japan are being asked to speak with “gender-specialist counselors” in order to convince them that men who identify as transgender are “female.”

Japan Women’s University (JWU) recently announced it would be adopting a self-identification policy that would allow men to apply for admission so long as they stated they were female. The policy will be implemented at the start of 2024, despite half of the female students currently enrolled expressing opposition or hesitation, as reported by the Asahi Shimbun.

In response to the female student’s concerns, JWU released a “Diversity Declaration” in June outlining that administrators intended to work towards convincing female students to change their views on gender ideology.

“Japan Women’s University has created an environment where ‘diversified women’ can learn together, such as formulating guidelines and manuals, assigning gender-specialized counselors, and setting up diversity weeks for students in order to accept ‘transgender women,'” reads the statement.

Satoko Oyama, a professor of social welfare at Japan Women’s University, along with her colleagues, instituted an in-house email hotline dedicated to promoting gender identity ideology. They also partnered with “gender-specialist counselors” to offer sessions to the women attending JWU. University officials have stated they intend to “dispel the anxiety of students,” according to media reports.

The testimony of an anonymous student, identified only as Y.M., is featured on the official JWU website. “I want to remember my privilege of being the majority,” writes Y.M.

“I think students at my university, being female, are the minority in this male-dominated society but are the majority when comparing ourselves to those who identify as transgender. That is, we can be both a minority and a majority depending on perspective,” she adds.

Minori Tokieda has called for women’s universities to grant admission to males who self-declare themselves to be female.

Minori Tokieda, a trans-identified male who heads the advocacy group Rainbow Tokyo Kita-ku, has campaigned extensively for women’s universities to admit men. At the beginning of the year, Tokieda presented a lecture on this topic at Tsuda Women’s University.

“An announcement by a women’s university that it will be accepting transgender students not only broadens the academic options for the target population but also sends out the heartening message that the university is their ally,” Tokieda said.

“This will also give an opportunity for non-transgender students to learn about diversity in their close surroundings,” he added.

Ochanomizu University, Japan’s first institution of higher education for women with a 142-year history, was also the first women’s university in Japan to announce that it would be admitting trans-identifying male students in 2018, with Nara Women’s University and Miyagi Gakuin Women’s University following suit. Earlier this year, Notre Dame Seishin University, which is also for women, said it would accept men who self-declare a female identity beginning in 2023.

Speaking to Reduxx, a Japanese women’s rights advocate who preferred to remain anonymous said the news “sickens” her.

“Already it’s [difficult] for girls to get a place … But the ease with which these women’s universities are just allowing these men in is sickening,” she says. “My daughter isn’t ready to apply for university yet – we are years away from that. But already I feel the tension … And now women will be fighting for even fewer spots at university. Because you can bet that in the next 10 years these women’s universities will admit more than just a few transgender applicants in their quest to look pious.”

The advocate also speculated that ‘positive discrimination’ may also be a factor with the admission of transgender applicants into women’s universities, with discrimination against female applicants being the norm in the Japanese higher education system.

Earlier this year, the revelation that mixed-sex universities in Japan were systematically lowering the entrance exam scores of female applicants in order to deny them admission sparked widespread controversy. Since the start of 2022, two Japanese universities have been ordered to pay restitution to female applicants for discrimination, and a third is currently in court proceedings.

In May, Juntendo University was ordered to pay out 8.05 million yen ($63,000 USD) in damages to 13 women after it was discovered they had been rigging entrance exam results in favor of male candidates. Months later, Tokyo Medical University was similarly forced to pay damages totaling 18.26 million yen ($128,000 USD) to 27 women whose scores were lowered in order to place them behind male applicants.

St. Marianna University School of Medicine in Kawasaki, Kanagawa Prefecture, is also currently involved in court proceedings brought by female applicants denied entry on the basis of their sex.

In 2018, the Japanese education ministry conducted an investigation after entrance exam score manipulation was first reported at Tokyo Medical University. According to their findings, nine medical schools in total had systematically lowered women’s entrance exams to favor male applicants and relatives of alumni.

The investigation found that after initial exam scores were lowered, at least 20 points were added to the scores for male applicants, and that similar entrance exam manipulations had occurred for years as universities sought to deny prospective female doctors. The justification argued that female doctors might choose to have children, and thereby shorten the length of their medical careers. The practice is believed to have begun as early as 2006 in some cases, and the government report referred to the rigging as “profound sexism.”

After the results of the government report were revealed, the gender equality minister at the time, Seiko Noda, told public broadcaster NHK: “It’s extremely disturbing if the university didn’t let women pass the exams because they think it’s difficult to work with female doctors.”

Following the international headlines on the blatant sex discrimination by top Japanese universities, The Washington Post reported on how enrollment of female students at elite academic institutions has been markedly unequal for the past two decades.

The institutional sex-based discrimination is so well-known in Japan, that there is a stereotype which suggests women who earn prestigious degrees will be unable to get married later in life. Prominent Japanese feminist Chizuko Ueno, a retired professor of gender studies, addressed the issue when speaking to freshman at Tokyo University in 2019. “Even before students enter the university, there is already hidden sexism,” Ms. Ueno said.

Dr. Caroline Norma, who lectures in the Master of Translating and Interpreting at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, spoke with Reduxx about the growing impact gender ideology is having on Japanese women’s already precarious situation.

Having written extensively on the issues impacting Japanese women, Dr. Norma said that recent efforts to coerce female students to accept trans-identified men in universities exemplify how the system has become “infected with gender identity propaganda from the West.” She specifically pointed to the humanities departments and the NGO sector as examples.

“Job opportunities for female university graduates are few, and some have picked up on the possibility of income generated through corporate ‘rainbow’ training. Most elite university campuses these days have an obligatory SOGI allies club, but most participants are aiming for jobs in the NGO sector,” she says.

Commenting on the deliberate denial of females into mixed-sex universities, Dr. Norma highlighted how profitable the medical industry is, and how women in Japan “are systematically shut out of opportunities” to earn an independent income.

“The same discrimination happens in corporate hiring processes, and top selective high schools operate ‘sex-equal’ intake policies when more girls ace their entrance exams. Now we have top women’s universities like Ochanomizu allowing male students self-identifying as women to enroll, even though such universities are elite, and so their admission means a young woman has lost a place,” Dr. Norma explained.

“Japanese women are forced to fight things like negative quotas operating for gender identity and male advancement in the absence of liberal values of women’s rights. Only 25% of Japan’s doctors are female, even though the medical system is filled with old female patients,” she says. “Birthing women are rarely given pain relief, and spycam incidents involving male doctors arise regularly in the news. But none of this is seen as reason to improve chances for women, and no particular nationwide policies are in place to reverse the situation of women in Japan.”

International rankings, including those from the World Economic Forum, consistently place Japan as one of the most unequal countries in the developed world in terms of political representation and economic opportunities for women.


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

Patreon Fires Security Staff Amid Allegations of Protecting ‘MAPs’

A GlassDoor review by a former Patreon employee is going viral on TikTok following news Patreon abruptly fired their entire security team. The ex-employee alleged that the company was forcing trust and safety team members to overlook pedophilic content on the platform and protect “minor-attracted people.”

On September 8, Emily Metcalfe, a now-former security and privacy engineer at Patreon, posted to LinkedIn that the entire Patreon security team had been abruptly let go.

“So, for better or for worse, I and the rest of the Patreon Security Team are no longer with the company,” Metcalfe wrote, soliciting leads on new roles within the industry. Metcalfe’s post went viral after a screenshot was shared to Twitter by information security lawyer Whitney Merrill.

While people were initially skeptical at the news, Patreon confirmed the news the next day in a statement issued to CyberScoop, claiming they had decided to cut their internal security team in favor of third-party solutions. “The changes made this week will have no impact on our ability to continue providing a secure and safe platform for our creators and patrons,” Patreon stated.

But following the abrupt decision, an ex-employee statement from August began to circulate and raise alarm bells amongst social media users. 

On August 16, a former trust and safety specialist at Patreon took to job review platform GlassDoor to allege that Patreon had demonstrated negligence with regards to child safeguarding in a review simply titled “Illegal.”

The former employee, who worked at Patreon for over one year, claimed platform management had been actively encouraging safety staff to overlook pedophilic content unless ordered to do otherwise by law enforcement.

“We are being told specifically by management and executives NOT to take down content that is illegal or was reported as sexual in nature involving minors unless the police make contact with legal or we have an order by a court,” the ex-employee wrote. “When others try to inform management that there’s an amalgamation of accounts that are selling lewd photographs of what appear to be children, all concerns are dismissed.”

Disturbingly, the review goes on to note that Patreon higher ups are “advocating for customers who are minor-attracted persons (or MAPs),” and concludes by saying: “This is no way to run a company, this is no way to allow children to be exploited on our platform like this.”

Under ‘advice to management,’ the ex-employee writes: “Have federal law enforcement investigate the company because there’s no way what we’re doing is legal.”

The review first came to widespread attention after being posted to TikTok by Ben Hughes, who slammed Patreon for its lack of child safeguarding measures. Hughes’ video quickly wracked up over 160,000 views and 28,000 likes.

But another TikToker’s experience with Patreon is now at the forefront of the discussion, as she claims Patreon had done precisely what the former employee alleged, and ignored her reports of pedophilic content.

Parenting lifestyle and child safeguarding commentator Sarah Adams, known on the app as mom.uncharted, made a video in February of this year discussing her experience attempting to inform Patreon about potentially illegal content.

Adams had first been alerted to an Instagram account featuring sexualized photos of what she says appeared to be a young girl. Adams quickly found the account also had a linked Patreon with over 2,000 donors.

In her original video, posted on February 16, Adams said the photos had given her “human trafficking vibes,” and she attempted to rally her more than 150,000 followers to have Patreon remove the account.

On February 22, Adams reached out to Patreon again after no action had been taken on the page.

The next day, she received a message from Patreon claiming that the creator of the page was verified as being over the age of 18 and there was no violation found. Adams expressed skepticism at the time, reading details on the Patreon age verification process, which at the time did not require valid government-issued ID.

In June, Adams announced Instagram had suspended the account, but it wasn’t until July or August that Patreon finally removed the content on their platform.

Speaking to Reduxx, Adams says the account has already popped back up on Instagram under a different username. Providing the link to Reduxx for review, the Instagram appears to be a collection of “soft-core” pornography featuring girls who seem to be underage. Additional tagged pages within the photos lead to similar accounts, one with even younger-looking girls.

Adams says that, when it was active, the Patreon had locked sections with photos available only to those subscribed donors.

“My assumption was that if [that] is what was displayed on the Instagram account, then the Patreon must be worse.”

Adams, who educates her followers on ways to protect children in the digital age, says child safeguarding by social media platforms has been lacking across the board. While this was the only example she has personally witnessed on Patreon, she notes that other TikTokers have been exposing similar disturbing incidents they’ve come across.

“This type of content is found on all social media platforms and there does not seem to be an urgency in removing it,” Adams says.

“I do not believe any platform is doing enough to protect children or monitor for [child sexual abuse] material. My assumption is that the exploitation of children adds to the bottom line of these companies so they are not in a hurry to implement change despite stating the safety of children is a top priority for them.”

On the recent news of the Patreon safety team being let go, Adams calls it a “surprising and unorthodox move” for a large company.

“Given the nature of the role, there could be a variety of reasons the team was let go. But I can’t lie, after that GlassDoor review, one can’t help but speculate.”

The TikToker also offers a recommendation for users who might become aware of pedophilic or exploitative content while using social media.

“First, report it on the platform. Second, report it to The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.” Adams also suggests copying links and bringing them to CyperTip.ca for Canadian residents.

Through the controversy, some are pointing out Patreon’s selectivity in what content they choose to action on.

The platform has been notorious for suspending creators who express views on political subjects that don’t align with the mainstream.

Earlier this year, YouTuber Sydney Watson was suspended from Patreon for “hate speech.” While Patreon did not explicitly state what Watson had done that fell under that policy, they did confirm it hadn’t been anything she said on their platform, and had been from activity of hers they had been monitoring elsewhere on the internet.

In 2021, Kellie-Jay Keen, a popular feminist activist from the United Kingdom, was also banned from Patreon. Like Watson, Keen was told she had violated “hate speech” policies, though Patreon never specified what she had done wrong.

Get The L Out UK, a grassroots campaign group which advocates for the rights of lesbians, was also recently banned from Patreon.

Despite the suspensions of political commentators on all sides of the political spectrum, another content creator, a YouTuber and “QTPOC” comic book artist who goes by the name Banjees, has posted content on Patreon coming out as a “minor-attracted person” with no apparent resistance from the platform.

Reduxx reached out to Patreon for comment on the allegations made by the former employee on GlassDoor, and was referred to a blog post made today in which they attempted to address the comments.

In the post, Patreon claims the statement made on GlassDoor was “unequivocally false” and labels it “disinformation” and a “conspiracy.” The platform goes on to state that there is no connection between any information shared in the GlassDoor review and the mass termination of the security team.

While the post also asserts that Patreon “has zero tolerance for the sexualization of children or teenagers,” it does not address its extreme delay in action on the account reported by Sarah Adams in February — one it initially defended and left active.

The term “minor-attracted person” was first coined by pro-pedophilia lobbying group B4U-ACT, which was founded in 2003 by convicted child rapist Michael Melsheimer. Melsheimer explicitly stated that the purpose of the organization was to normalize pedophilia where the National Association of Man-Boy Love had failed to do so. 

Around the time of the organization’s creation, Melsheimer advised his fellow pedophiles on pederast forum BoyChat that his new approach for normalizing pedophilia would be focused around garnering public sympathy by deceptively claiming that the humanization of pedophiles would lead to a reduction in child sexual abuse.

Today, B4U-Act had worked with multiple University researchers on the subject of destigmatizing pedophilia, and its highly-promoted term of “minor-attracted person” has gained broad usage, primarily amongst academics.

Earlier this year, a controversial PhD researcher was hired on at a national child safeguarding center just months after being fired for advocating for the rights of “minor-attracted people.”

On May 12, the Moore Center for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse announced that Allyn Walker would be joining the Center as a postdoctoral fellow. Walker was an assistant professor of sociology and criminal justice at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia until she came under fire in late 2021 after releasing a book titled “A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor-Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity.”


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

Patreon despide al personal de seguridad entre acusaciones de proteger a pedófilos

Una crítica en GlassDoor (plataforma de empleo y reclutamiento con opiniones e información de empleados) de un ex empleado de Patreon se ha vuelto viral en TikTok tras la noticia de que Patreon había despedido de repente a todo su equipo de seguridad. El ex empleado alegó que la compañía estaba obligando a los miembros del equipo de Confianza y Seguridad a pasar por alto el contenido pedófilo en la plataforma y proteger a las “personas atraídas por menores”, o “MAPs”.

El 8 de septiembre, Emily Metcalfe, ahora ex ingeniero de seguridad y privacidad en Patreon, publicó en LinkedIn que todo el equipo de seguridad de Patreon había sido despedido abruptamente.

“Así que, para bien o para mal, ni yo ni el resto del equipo de seguridad de Patreon trabajamos ya para la compañía”, escribió Metcalfe, que busca ahora ayuda para encontrar trabajo dentro de la industria. La publicación de Metcalfe se volvió viral cuando una abogada de seguridad informática, Whitney Merrill, compartiera una captura de pantalla.

Si bien la gente inicialmente se mostró escéptica ante la noticia, Patreon la confirmó al día siguiente en un comunicado emitido a CyberScoop, afirmando que habían decidido deshacerse de su equipo de seguridad interna en favor de soluciones externas. “Los cambios realizados esta semana no tendrán ningún impacto en nuestra capacidad de continuar proporcionando una plataforma segura para nuestros autores y clientes”, declaró Patreon.

Pero tras la abrupta decisión, comenzó a circular una declaración de agosto de un ex empleado que hizo sonar las alarmas entre los usuarios de las redes sociales.

El 16 de agosto, un ex especialista en Confianza y Seguridad de Patreon fue a la plataforma de opinión de trabajo GlassDoor para alegar que Patreon había demostrado negligencia con respecto a la protección infantil en un comentario titulado simplemente “Ilegal“.

El ex empleado, que trabajó en Patreon durante más de un año, contó que la administración de la plataforma había estado alentando activamente al personal de seguridad a pasar por alto el contenido pedófilo a menos que la policía ordenara lo contrario.

“La dirección y los ejecutivos nos dicen específicamente que NO eliminemos el contenido que es ilegal o que fue denunciado como de naturaleza sexual que involucra a menores a menos que la policía se ponga en contacto con el departamento legal o tengamos una orden de un tribunal”, escribió el ex empleado. “Cuando otros intentan informar a dirección de la existencia de una amalgama de cuentas que venden fotografías lascivas de lo que parecen ser niños, descartan las preocupaciones por completo”.

Aún más alarmante, la publicación señala que los altos mandos de Patreon “abogan por los clientes que son personas atraídas por menores (o MAPs)”, y concluye diciendo: “Esta no es la manera de dirigir una empresa, no se puede permitir que los niños sean explotados en nuestra plataforma de esta manera”.

Bajo ‘consejo a la dirección’, el ex empleado escribe: “Haced que la policía federal investigue a la compañía porque lo que estamos haciendo no puede ser legal”.

La publicación llamó primero la atención cuando fue publicada en TikTok por Ben Hughes, quien criticó a Patreon por su falta de medidas de protección infantil. El video de Hughes obtuvo rápidamente más de 160,000 visitas y 28,000 me gusta.

Pero la experiencia de otra TikToker con Patreon está ahora a la vanguardia de la discusión, ya que afirma que Patreon había hecho precisamente lo que el ex empleado alegó, e ignoró sus denuncias de contenido pedófilo.

La comentarista de estilo y de seguridad infantil, Sarah Adams, conocida en la aplicación como mom.uncharted, hizo un video en febrero de este año explicando su experiencia al intentar informar a Patreon sobre contenido potencialmente ilegal.

A Adams la avisaron de una cuenta de Instagram con fotos sexualizadas de lo que ella dice que parecía ser una niña. Adams descubrió rápidamente que la cuenta también tenía una cuenta de Patreon vinculada con más de 2,000 donantes.

En su video original, publicado el 16 de febrero, Adams dijo que las fotos le habían dado “vibraciones de trata de personas”, e intentó movilizar a sus más de 150,000 seguidores para que Patreon eliminara la cuenta.

El 22 de febrero, Adams se puso en contacto con Patreon nuevamente, porque no había tomado ninguna medida al respecto.

Al día siguiente, recibió un mensaje de Patreon que decía que el creador de la página fue verificado como mayor de 18 años y que no se había encontrado ninguna infracción. Adams expresó escepticismo tras leer los detalles sobre el proceso de verificación de edad de Patreon, que en ese momento no requería una identificación válida emitida por el gobierno.

En junio, Adams anunció que Instagram había suspendido la cuenta, pero no fue hasta julio o agosto que Patreon finalmente eliminó el contenido de su plataforma.

En declaraciones a Reduxx, Adams dice que la cuenta ya ha aparecido de nuevo en Instagram con un nombre de usuario diferente. La cuenta de Instagram proporcionada por Adams parece ser una colección de pornografía “soft-core” con chicas que parecen ser menores de edad. Las páginas etiquetadas adicionales dentro de las fotos conducen a cuentas similares, una con chicas aún más jóvenes.

Adams dice que, cuando estaba activo, el Patreon tenía secciones cerradas con fotos disponibles solo para aquellos donantes que estaban suscritos.

“Mi suposición era que si [eso] es lo que se mostraba en la cuenta de Instagram, entonces el Patreon debe ser peor”.

Adams, quien enseña a sus seguidores diferentes formas de proteger a los niños en la era digital, dice que la protección infantil por parte de las plataformas de redes sociales ha faltado en todos los ámbitos. Si bien este fue el único ejemplo que ha presenciado personalmente en Patreon, señala que otros TikTokers han estado exponiendo incidentes perturbadores similares que han encontrado.

“Este tipo de contenido se encuentra en todas las plataformas de redes sociales y no parece haber ninguna prisa en eliminarlo”, dice Adams.

“No creo que ninguna plataforma esté haciendo lo suficiente para proteger a los niños o controlar el material [de abuso sexual infantil]. Mi suposición es que la explotación de los niños suma dinero al balance final de estas empresas, por lo que no tienen prisa por implementar un cambio a pesar de afirmar que la seguridad de los niños es una prioridad para ellos”.

Sobre la reciente noticia de que Patreon había despedido al equipo entero de seguridad, Adams lo llama un “movimiento sorprendente y poco ortodoxo” para una gran empresa.

“Dada la naturaleza del trabajo, podría haber una variedad de razones por las que el equipo fue despedido. Pero no quiero mentir, después de aquella publicación de GlassDoor, una no puede evitar especular”.

La TikToker también da un consejo a los usuarios que pueden encontrar contenido pedófilo o explotador cuando usan las redes sociales.

“Primero, denúncialo en la plataforma. En segundo lugar, denúncialo al Centro Nacional para Niños Desaparecidos y Explotados“. Adams también sugiere copiar los enlaces y llevárselos a CyperTip.ca en caso de ser residentes canadienses.

Gracias a la polémica, algunos están señalando el criterio selectivo de Patreon cuando se trata del contenido sobre el que eligen actuar.

La plataforma es famosa por suspender a los creadores que expresan puntos de vista sobre temas políticos que no se alinean con la narrativa dominante.

A principios de este año, la YouTuber Sydney Watson fue expulsada de Patreon por “discurso de odio”. Si bien Patreon no dijo explícitamente lo que Watson había hecho para que se le aplicara esa política, sí confirmó que no había sido nada de lo que había dicho en su plataforma, sino que había sido por su actividad en otras partes de Internet, que habían estado controlando.

En 2021, Kellie-Jay Keen, una popular activista feminista del Reino Unido, también fue expulsada de Patreon. Al igual que Watson, a Keen le dijeron que había violado las políticas de “discurso de odio”, aunque Patreon nunca especificó qué había hecho mal.

Get The L Out UK, un grupo de campaña de base que aboga por los derechos de las lesbianas, también fue recientemente expulsado de Patreon.

A pesar de las suspensiones de comentaristas políticos en todos los lados del espectro político, otro creador de contenido, un YouTuber y artista de cómics “QTPOC” (Queer and Trans People of Colour) que se hace llamar Banjees, ha publicado contenido en Patreon en el que sale del armario como una “persona atraída por menores” sin resistencia aparente de la plataforma.

Reduxx se puso en contacto con Patreon para obtener comentarios sobre las acusaciones hechas por el ex empleado en GlassDoor, y se la remitió a una publicación de blog hecha hoy en la que intentaron salir al paso de los comentarios.

En la publicación, Patreon afirma que la publicación hecha en GlassDoor era “inequívocamente falsa” y la califica de “desinformación” y de “conspiración”. La plataforma continúa diciendo que no hay ninguna conexión entre la información compartida en los comentarios de GlassDoor y el despido masivo del equipo de seguridad.

Si bien la publicación también afirma que Patreon “tiene tolerancia cero para la sexualización de niños o adolescentes”, no aborda la enorme demora de actuación sobre la cuenta denunciada por Sarah Adams en febrero, una cuenta que inicialmente defendió y dejó activa.

El término “persona atraída por menores” fue acuñado por primera vez por el grupo de presión pro-pedofilia B4U-ACT, que fue fundado en 2003 por el pederasta convicto Michael Melsheimer. Melsheimer declaró explícitamente que el propósito de la organización era normalizar la pedofilia donde la Asociación Nacional de Amor Hombre-Niño no había tenido éxito.

Alrededor del momento de la fundación de la organización, Melsheimer dijo a sus compañeros pedófilos en el foro de pederastas BoyChat que su nuevo enfoque para normalizar la pedofilia se centraría en obtener la simpatía del público al afirmar falsamente que la humanización de los pedófilos conduciría a una reducción en el abuso sexual infantil.

Hoy en día, B4U-Act ha trabajado con varios investigadores de la Universidad en el tema de la desestigmatización de la pedofilia, y su muy promocionado término de “persona atraída por menores” ha ganado un uso generalizado, principalmente entre los académicos.

A principios de este año, un centro nacional de protección infantil contrató a una polémica investigadora de doctorado pocos meses después de ser despedida por defender los derechos de las “personas atraídas por menores”.

El 12 de mayo, el Centro Moore para la Prevención del Abuso Sexual Infantil anunció que Allyn Walker se uniría al Centro como becaria postdoctoral. Walker fue profesora asistente de sociología y justicia penal en la Universidad Old Dominion en Norfolk, Virginia, hasta que se desató la polémica a finales de 2021 por la publicación de su libro titulado “A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor-Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity” (“Una Larga y Oscura Sombra: Personas Atraídas por Menores y la Búsqueda de su Dignidad”)


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes! Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon

MEXICO: Trans Activists Stage “Coup” of Women’s Washroom at University, Issue Rape Threats

Female students at one of Latin America’s top Universities say trans activists staged a coup of a single-sex washroom on their campus, and have left some gender critical women and lesbians fearing for their lives.

On August 24, feminist students at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) were confronted by trans activists as they painted a lesbian pride symbol on a wall near the Samuel Ramos Library. Speaking to Reduxx, a witness who prefers to remain anonymous said that the activists began hurling verbal abuse at the women who were painting the lesbian labrys.

“They called them TERFs, colonial fascists, and transphobes,” the source says, noting that shortly after, additional activists from the Queer groups on campus joined in to harass the female students. The women desperately tried to appease the crowd by talking with those who were outraged.

“The women tried to engage in a dialogue, but found that the trans activists only wanted them to paint a symbol for lesbianism they agreed with.”

Shortly after, as a result of the lesbian symbol that had been painted, the trans students reportedly declared that they “did not feel safe” on the campus and went to administrators to demand a gender-neutral washroom be established in that area.

While administrators agreed to create one, the students did not wait for it to be designated. Less than 24 hours later, the activists took over the largest female restroom, which was on the second floor of the Faculty of Philosophy.

As part of their symbolic coup, the activists vandalized the walls outside of the washroom with anti-feminist and pro-sex trade graffiti.

“Less abolitionism, more whoring,” and “less TERFs, more sex” were among the slogans painted outside of the washroom. The “female” bathroom designation was also erased and replaced with “gender neutral.”

The source within the school says that the washroom that had been seized had once been considered one of the safest for women on the campus. Sexual assaults at UNAM are so common that the University recently had to install emergency buttons inside of the cubicles of women’s washrooms.

As a result of lack of safe alternatives, as well as a reluctance to give into the demands of the trans activists, female students have continued to use the washroom, but now report lengthy wait-times and queues as male students have also taken to using the “gender neutral” facility due to its size and convenience.

In response to the bathroom putsch, some feminist students on campus attempted to mark the washroom with their own graffiti.

Photos from inside the washroom taken last week show some feminist slogans have been written on the mirrors and walls. One reads: “if you want a unisex washroom, take it from the men! Don’t violate women’s spaces,” while another asks the activists to respect the rights of female minority students.

But other photos snapped inside show violent threats have now emerged, directed at the women. One, which was menacingly placed near an assault crisis button, reads: “rape and death for TERFs.”

“Rape and death to TERFs.” Graffiti seen inside the washroom at UNAM

Feminist students reportedly tried to make the University aware of the threatening graffiti, and documented its location for administrators to have it cleaned up, but the University claimed it “couldn’t find” the violent slogans despite it being marked by the women.

The source within UNAM reported to Reduxx that administration has been ordering the removal of the feminist graffiti, but allowed those made by trans activists to remain up, including the death and rape threats.

In a statement issued on August 26, the University appeared to express support for the trans activists who had taken over the female washroom while condemning those expressing “discrimination” towards them.

“The technical council … agreed to categorically condemn any expression of hate, violence, or discrimination towards gender-diverse students,” the statement read. “This is no place for those who undermine the human rights of people who make up our community.”

An August 26 statement from the Faculty.

Apparently emboldened by the University’s lack of action, trans activists have been targeting lesbian and feminist students in an effort to intimidate them. Gender critical women on the campus who have tried to organize formal protests against the seizure of the washroom have been faced with harassment.

“They have begun a witch hunt against lesbian feminists who belong to student organizations,” the source at the University told Reduxx. She continued that female students known to be opposed to trans activism are being particularly targeted.

“They follow [us] to the bathrooms, hoping to find [us] red-handed painting graffiti,” the anonymous source says. “They want to silence us, it is a witch hunt.”

Commenting on the incident, Women’s Declaration International Mexico representative Laura Lecuona expressed outrage at what has happened on the UNAM campus.

“UNAM, and in particular the Faculty of Philosophy, has been a breeding ground for transgender policies for years,” Lecuona tells Reduxx. “In recent months, the violence of different anti-women groups has increased. They have impunity, with the active and passive complicity of [University] authorities.”

Lecuona says the University has been actively imposing gender ideology on students, and that there has been multiple incidents of trans activists on the campus forcing the administration’s hand under threat of unrest. Lecuona explains that earlier this year, trans activists on the campus demanded that a video explaining the difference between sex and gender be deleted from the University’s systems.

“It seems that the authorities are terrified,” Lecuona says. “They make it very clear who they want to protect. Time and again, [UNAM] has shown that their campuses and faculties are not safe spaces for women.”

Lecuona alludes to the statement issued by the University, and asserts that while administration is buckling to the demands of the trans activists, feminists and lesbians on the UNAM campus have been showing tremendous resolve in the face institutional condemnation.

“Under the passive gaze of those who should be protecting our freedom… our bodies are attacked and our words are attacked. If the authorities are afraid, feminists will not be.”

Trans activism is closely related to pro-sex trade activism in Mexico. In July, a transgender politician aggressively disrupted a government conference aimed at tackling human trafficking after becoming offended at the implications abolitionist policies would have on trans “sex workers.”

Maria Clemente, a trans-identified male politician elected to Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies last year, called the suggestion that the sex trade be abolished for the protection of women and children “hate speech.” To a critic, Clemente said: “I am a woman, and I am a whore!  It’s my job and and how my family eats! I love it!”

Sex-based violence against women in Mexico is considered to be among the highest in the world, with the country’s femicide rate continuing to rise even as the general homicide rate falls. 85% of human trafficking victims in the country are female, with women and girls overrepresented in every form of the crime, including organ trafficking, forced prostitution, and labor exploitation.


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

MÉXICO: Transactivistas toman un baño de mujeres en la universidad y amenazan con violaciones

Las estudiantes de una de las mejores universidades de América Latina dicen que los transactivistas tomaron un baño de mujeres en el campus, y debido a sus amenazas, algunas lesbianas y mujeres críticas de género ahora temen por sus vidas.

El 24 de agosto, activistas trans increparon a estudiantes feministas de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) cuando pintaban un símbolo del orgullo lésbico en una pared cerca de la Biblioteca Samuel Ramos. En declaraciones a Reduxx, una testigo que prefiere permanecer en el anonimato dijo que los activistas comenzaron a insultar a las mujeres que estaban pintando el labrys lésbico.

“Las llamaron TERF, fascistas coloniales y transodiantes”, dice la fuente, y añade que poco después otros activistas de los grupos queer del campus se unieron para acosar a las estudiantes. Las mujeres trataron desesperadamente de apaciguar a la multitud hablando con aquellos que estaban indignados.

“Las mujeres intentaron entablar un diálogo, pero se encontraron con que los activistas trans querían que pintaran un símbolo de lesbianismo con el que estuvieran de acuerdo”.

Poco después, como resultado de la pintada del símbolo lésbico, los estudiantes trans declararon que “no se sentían seguros” en el campus y acudieron a los administradores para exigir un baño de género neutro en ese área.

Si bien los administradores acordaron crear uno, los estudiantes no esperaron a que fuera designado. Menos de 24 horas después, los activistas habían tomado el baño de mujeres más grande del segundo piso de la Facultad de Filosofía.

Como parte de la toma simbólica, los activistas vandalizaron las paredes de fuera del baño con grafitis antifeministas y pro comercio sexual.

“Menos abolos, más putería” y “menos TERF, más bellakeo” fueron algunos de los mensajes pintados en las paredes exteriores del baño. El letrero de baño de “damas” también se borró y se reemplazó con baño “neutro”.

La fuente dentro de la universidad dice que el baño que fue incautado era antes considerado uno de los más seguros para las mujeres en el campus. Las agresiones sexuales en la UNAM son tan comunes que la Universidad recientemente tuvo que instalar botones de emergencia dentro de los cubículos de los baños de mujeres.

Como resultado de la falta de alternativas seguras, así como de la resistencia a ceder a las demandas de los activistas trans, las estudiantes han seguido usando el baño, pero ahora denuncian largas colas y prolongadas esperas, ya que los estudiantes varones también han comenzado a usar la instalación “neutra” debido a su tamaño y conveniencia.

En respuesta a la toma del baño, algunas estudiantes feministas en el campus intentaron marcarlo con su propio graffiti.

Las fotos del interior del baño tomadas la semana pasada muestran que se habían escrito algunas consignas feministas en los espejos y las paredes. Una dice: “Si quieren un baño mixto, quítenselo a los hombres. No violenten los espacios de mujeres”, y otro pide a los activistas que prioricen a las mujeres.

Pero otras fotos tomadas en el interior muestran que ahora han aparecido amenazas violentas dirigidas a las mujeres. Una pintada, escrita amenazadoramente cerca de un botón de emergencia, dice: “violación y muerte a las TERFs”.

Según se informa, las estudiantes feministas denunciaron a la Universidad el graffiti amenazador y documentaron su ubicación para que los administradores lo limpiaran, pero la Universidad dijo que “no había podido encontrar” los mensajes violentos a pesar de haber sido bien señalados por las mujeres.

La fuente dentro de la UNAM informó a Reduxx que la administración ha ordenado la eliminación de los grafitis feministas, pero permite que los realizados por activistas trans continúen en las paredes, incluidos aquellos que amenazan de muerte y violación.

En una declaración emitida el 26 de agosto, la Universidad parece expresar su apoyo a los activistas trans que se habían apoderado del baño femenino, mientras que condena al mismo tiempo a quienes expresaban “discriminación” hacia ellos.

“El consejo técnico … acordó condenar categóricamente cualquier expresión de odio, violencia o discriminación hacia las diversidades sexo-genéricas”, se puede leer en el comunicado. “No caben discursos que socaven los derechos humanos de las personas que componen nuestra comunidad”.

Aparentemente envalentonados por la falta de acción de la Universidad, los activistas trans han estado acosando a estudiantes lesbianas y feministas con la finalidad de intimidarlas. Las mujeres críticas de género en el campus que han tratado de organizar protestas formales contra la toma del baño han sufrido acoso.

“Han comenzado una caza de brujas contra feministas lesbianas que pertenecen a organizaciones estudiantiles”, dijo la fuente de la Universidad a Reduxx. “Las estudiantes que se oponen al activismo trans están siendo particularmente acosadas.”

“Nos siguen a los baños, esperando encontrarnos in flagrante haciendo pintadas”, dice la fuente anónima. “Nos quieren silenciar, es una quema de brujas”.

La representante de Women’s Declaration International México, Laura Lecuona, expresó su indignación por lo que ha sucedido en el campus de la UNAM.

“La UNAM, y en particular la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, lleva años siendo caldo de cultivo de las políticas transgeneristas”, dice Lecuona a Reduxx. “En los últimos meses la violencia de diferentes grupos antimujeres ha aumentado. Tienen impunidad, con la activa y pasiva complicidad de las autoridades [universitarias]”.

Lecuona dice que la Universidad ha estado imponiendo activamente la ideología de género a los estudiantes, y que ha habido múltiples ejemplos de activistas trans en el campus forzando la mano de la administración bajo amenaza de disturbios. Lecuona explica que a principios de este año, activistas trans en el campus exigieron que se eliminara de los sistemas de la Universidad un video que explicaba la diferencia entre sexo y género.

“Parece que las autoridades están aterradas”, dice Lecuona. “Dejan muy claro a quién quieren proteger. Una y otra vez, [la UNAM] ha demostrado que sus campus y facultades no son espacios seguros para las mujeres”.

Lecuona alude al comunicado emitido por la Universidad, y afirma que mientras la administración se pliega a las demandas de los activistas trans, feministas y lesbianas en el campus de la UNAM han venido mostrando una tremenda determinación ante la condena institucional.

“Ante la mirada pasiva de quiénes tendrían que garantizar nuestras libertades, se atacan nuestros cuerpos y se atacan nuestras palabras. Si las autoridades tienen miedo, las feministas no lo tendremos”.

El activismo trans está estrechamente relacionado con el activismo a favor del comercio sexual en México. En julio, un político transgénero interrumpió agresivamente (aquí en español) una conferencia del gobierno destinada a abordar la trata de personas, al sentirse ofendido por las implicaciones que las políticas abolicionistas tendrían sobre los “trabajadores sexuales” trans.

María Clemente, un político transidentificado y miembro de la Cámara de Diputados de México desde el año pasado, calificó la sugerencia de que se aboliera el comercio sexual para la protección de mujeres y niños como “discurso de odio”. Clemente dijo a sus detractores: “¡Soy una mujer y soy una puta! ¡Es mi trabajo y cómo come mi familia! ¡Me encanta!”

La violencia sexual contra las mujeres en México se considera una de las más altas del mundo, y la tasa de feminicidios del país continúa aumentando aunque la tasa general de homicidios disminuye. El 85% de las víctimas de la trata de personas en el país son mujeres, y las mujeres y las niñas están sobrerrepresentadas en todas las formas del delito, incluido el tráfico de órganos, la prostitución forzada y la explotación laboral.


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes! Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon

NZ: Trans Murderer Denied Appeal On Life Conviction For Killing, Torturing Teen Girl

A trans-identified convict who was handed a life sentence for the senseless torture and murder of a teen girl in New Zealand has been denied leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. Toko Shane Rei Winter, who goes by Ashley, was found guilty in September 2019 of the abduction and murder of 17-year-old Dimetrius Pairama.

In July of 2018, Winter and his accomplice Kerry Te Amo kidnapped Pairama, taking her to an abandoned social assistance house in Middlemore. Two other teens were present during the five-hour ordeal, and one girl, who was 14 years old at the time, was granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for a full account of the events.

According to the girl’s testimony, Pairama was tied to a chair and stripped naked. Winter then shaved her head before one of the teenagers used a make-shift flamethrower, fashioned out of a lighter and a chemical spray, to burn her body.

Dimetrius Pairama.

“They made her sit on the chair, tied her up and shaved her hair,” she said. “Tape was on her legs, and then rope on the arms,” said the witness. At one point the detective asked if Pairama fought back, but the teen said no. “She doesn’t know how to fight… she just went with it.”

The teen explained that Winter then told Te Amo that it was his turn to beat Pairama, and that she believed she heard the girl’s bones breaking as he hit her.

The witness told the court that she had pleaded with Te Amo and Winter to stop tormenting Pairama, at which point Winter began to burn her.

“[Winter] went looking in the cupboard, there was heaps of chemicals in there. [He] found a spray, and I think it was a spray paint. [He] lit the lighter up, and then sprayed it towards the lighter and burnt her body parts,” the witness said, using feminine pronouns to refer to Winter.

Pairama was then allegedly covered in a sheet before Winter dumped chemicals on her. As the teen was laid on the ground, Winter then asked her how she would like to be killed.

“[Winter] then goes, ‘how do you wanna die, you only got till three o’clock. If you don’t tell me I’m gonna stab your throat,'” the witness said.

The two teens were then left alone together. The 14 year-old girl told the court that she offered to help Pairama escape.

“I asked her if she was alright, she said no. She goes she wants to see her nana, and that’s when I got her clothes and I gave it to her … I said get out the window and just go as far as you can, but she said she was too scared. She told me to tell [Winter] that she wants to hang herself.”

The duo fashioned a noose out of bedsheets and attempted to hang Pairama. Their first attempt failed; however, the second attempt resulted in the teen’s death. Afterwards, they dumped her body in a steel drum, where it was discovered behind the house in Māngere in July 2018.

During a three-week investigation, Winter repeatedly changed his story, with both Te Amo and Winter blaming each other for the killing. Winter initially claimed he had helplessly watched while his “best sister” was hanged by Te Amo.

Kerry Te Amo [L] and Toko Shane Rei Winter [R]. Photo Credit: Doug Sherring & Sam Hurley/NZ Herald.

In a recorded interview with authorities, Winter described Pairama as his “best friend” despite not even knowing her full name.

“I don’t know her name, probably known her for years. I just know her as ‘Sis,'” Winter claimed.

But the statement was directly contradicted by the teen witness. She told the court that Winter had been the “ringleader,” and that he had only met Pairama the day before the murder. Winter had also made repeated claims of being involved in a local gang called the Mongrel Mob.

Later on during the investigation, Winter admitted to beating Pairama because he believed the teenager was spreading rumors about him.

Disturbingly, during Pairama’s torture, a group of police officers visited the abandoned house Pairama was being kept in, seeking a former tenant who lived at the residence. Pairama was sent to answer the door, and the officers could see she was distressed and had been crying.

Winter interjected in the interaction, and told the officers she had just broken up with a boyfriend and dismissed them. During the trial, one officer told the court that he had felt Winter was “the boss” in the situation.

Crown Solicitor Natalie Walker, who prosecuted Winter and Te Amo, said that Winter was at a high risk of re-offending. “This was sadistic violence in which [he] was the ringleader,” Walker said. “[He] doesn’t accept responsibility.”

Representing Winter, attorney Matthew Goodwin made a point of telling the jury not to discriminate against Winter for identifying as transgender. He mentioned Winter’s “struggles” with “gender transition” as a mitigating factor.

“In the darkest moments of this case, one wonders whether the defendants were taking out their frustrations in their lives and that contributed to a loss of self-control,” Goodwin told the court.

However, one of Te Amo’s lawyers, Shane Tait, told the court that Winter’s biological sex was an important factor in the murder.

“In a trial involving assaults and violence it’s important we appreciate that [he’s] not in there slapping and hitting like a dainty fish; [he’s] in there with big fists and the strength of a male.”

Justice Timothy Brewer said Winter was clearly the “dominant” offender and was generally “in-charge” during the brutal slaying. He believed Winter executed the teen “because [he] found the situation exciting.”

The pair were sentenced in 2019 at the High Court in Auckland, and the verdict was unanimous.

Media coverage of the case has consistently referred to Winter as a woman and, in many instances, failed to mention his transgender status.

Winter was sentenced to a minimum of 19 years and four months in jail while Te Amo was ordered to spend at least 19 years behind bars. Both have since sought to have their convictions overturned and their sentences reduced, but their applications were dismissed by the Court of Appeal earlier this year.

On September 6, the Supreme Court also released a judgement dismissing Winter’s leave to appeal application, based on similar grounds stated previously by the Court of Appeal.

It is not clear where Winter is being detained to serve his life sentence, though a citizen of New Zealand, Sarah Fort, requested this information from the Department of Corrections (DOC) in September 2020.

In response, DOC representative Robert Jones told Fort that “the placement of transgender and intersex people in a men’s or women’s prison, including the process for a review of initial determination of placement, is managed in accordance with Prison Operations Manual.”

The New Zealand DOC website advises prison officials to “consider the support the trans person needs and wants while in prison.” Corrections staff are required to discuss a support plan with trans-identifying inmates within three days of their reception. Men who claim a female identity may be provided with prosthetic breasts, brassieres, and feminine undergarments, and they may choose to request to be searched by female officers.

In April this year, another concerned citizen requested information regarding the number of trans-identifying prisoners currently being housed in women’s prisons. Dianne Landy filed a request asking for the figures, as well as the amount of individuals who have a medium to high risk security rating.

The DOC again replied in an evasive manner, without providing the information and instead delayed their response indefinitely.


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

Reino Unido: mandan a la cárcel de mujeres a un pederasta en serie condenado por 30 delitos de abuso sexual infantil

Photo Source: Eddie Mitchell/THE DAILY MAIL

Un pederasta en serie transgénero va a ingresar en una prisión de mujeres en el Reino Unido tras recibir una condena por 30 delitos relacionados con el abuso sexual de 7 niños.

John Robert Dixon, de 58 años, llevó a cabo abusos contra cinco niñas y dos niños de 1989 a 1996, cuando la víctima más joven tenía 7 años. En 2004, Dixon comenzó a identificarse como una mujer llamada Sally Anne.

En julio, un jurado declaró a Dixon culpable de 30 delitos de abusos deshonestos e indecencia pública contra un menor en lo que se describió como una campaña de abuso sexual contra las siete víctimas. Según el Daily Mail, el fiscal del caso, Ryan Richter. calificó a Dixon como un “depredador sexual atrevido y despiadado” que explotaba a hombres jóvenes y que “cultivaba una relación tóxica” con las víctimas femeninas.

El pederasta se aprovechaba de los niños que llegaba a conocer a través de conexiones familiares y les hacía grooming para que confiaran en él. Dixon llegó a abusar de algunos de los menores durante meses en su garaje o en su caravana.

Dixon estuvo en la cárcel seis meses en 1997 por el abuso sexual de un adolescente, pero no fue hasta 2019, cuando otra víctima denunció más abusos, que la policía de Sussex inició una investigación a gran escala.

Hoy, un juez del Tribunal de la Corona de Lewes declaró que Dixon estaba condenado a cumplir un mínimo de 12 años en la cárcel  antes de poder solicitar la libertad condicional. Pero, para indignación de algunos, Dixon cumplirá su condena en una prisión femenina, a pesar del hecho de que Dixon no tiene un Certificado de Reconocimiento de Género (GRC), un documento que indica que una persona ha cambiado legalmente de género.

Si bien los GRC no son caros ni difíciles de obtener, requieren que una persona cumpla ciertas condiciones para que se admita a trámite, y una de ellas es que tenga un diagnóstico de disforia de género.

Debido a la falta de un GRC, la Dra. Kate Coleman dijo que la noticia del internamiento de Dixon en HMC Bronzefield en Ashford “fue un shock”.

Coleman es la directora de Keep Prisons Single Sex, un grupo de campaña centrado en abogar por mantener las prisiones separadas por sexo, no por identidad de género auto declarada. Dice que, según los últimos datos, menos del 1% de los reclusos varones identificados trans sin GRC están internos en prisiones de mujeres, mientras que más del 90% de los que tienen un GRC sí lo están.

“Esto parecía indicar un cambio real en la distribución, es decir que era muy poco probable que alguien sin un GRC fuera recluido en una prisión de mujeres”, dijo Coleman a Reduxx, y señala que el estándar parecía indicar que los convictos con un historial de delitos violentos o sexuales no iban a ser enviados a una institución femenina a menos que tuvieran un GRC. Y agregó: “Esto parecía una razón para ser optimistas”.

Como resultado, Coleman expresó confusión por la decisión de enviar a Dixon a una prisión de mujeres.

“Esta persona tiene un prolífico historial de delitos sexuales graves contra niños y ha recibido una larga sentencia de cárcel. A pesar de sus condenas, ha sido enviado a una prisión de mujeres donde cumplirá su sentencia junto a mujeres, muchas de las cuales han sido víctimas de abuso sexual infantil”.

Coleman señaló que HMP Bronzefield también alberga a delincuentes juveniles que tienen vulnerabilidades particulares.

Según Keep Prisons Single Sex, el 72% de las mujeres encarceladas son delincuentes no violentas. El 23% de las mujeres están en la cárcel por su primera ofensa y la mitad de las mujeres encarceladas denuncian haber sido víctimas de abuso físico o sexual cuando eran niñas.

“Estoy horrorizada de que el servicio penitenciario haya optado por no incluir a Dixon entre el 99% de hombres transidentificados sin GRC que cumplen su sentencia en cárceles masculinas”.

Desde noviembre de 2021, solo hay un hombre trans identificado sin un GRC en una cárcel de mujeres.


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes! Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon

Nueva Zelanda: se le rechaza la apelación de cadena perpetua a asesino trans por torturar y matar a adolescente

A un preso transidentificado se le ha negado el derecho a recurrir ante la Corte Suprema su sentencia a cadena perpetua por la tortura y el asesinato de una adolescente en Nueva Zelanda. Toko Shane Rei Winter, que se hace llamar Ashley, fue declarado culpable en septiembre de 2019 del secuestro y asesinato de Dimetrius Pairama, de 17 años.

En julio de 2018, Winter y su cómplice Kerry Te Amo secuestraron a Pairama y la llevaron a una casa abandonada en Middlemore. Otros dos adolescentes estuvieron presentes durante el suplicio de cinco horas, y una niña, que tenía 14 años en aquel momento, recibió inmunidad a cambio de un relato completo de los hechos.

Según el testimonio de la niña, ataron a Pairama a una silla y la desnudaron. Winter luego le afeitó la cabeza y uno de los adolescentes usó un lanzallamas improvisado, hecho de un encendedor y un aerosol químico, para quemarle el cuerpo.

“La hicieron sentarse en la silla, la ataron y le afeitaron la cabeza”, dijo. “La ataron las piernas con cinta y luego los brazos con cuerdas”, dijo la testigo. En un momento dado, el detective preguntó si Pairama se había intentado defender, pero la adolescente dijo que no. “Ella no sabía pelear … simplemente se fue con él”.

La adolescente explicó que Winter luego le dijo a Te Amo que le tocaba a él golpear a Pairama, y que creía haber oído como se rompían los huesos de la niña cuando la golpeó.

La testigo le dijo al tribunal que le había suplicado a Te Amo y Winter que dejaran de atormentar a Pairama, pero Winter comenzó a quemarla.

“[Winter] fue a buscar al armario, había montones de productos químicos allí. [Él] encontró un aerosol, y creo que era una pintura de aerosol. [Él] encendió el mechero, y luego dirigió el espray hacia ella y le quemó partes del cuerpo”, dijo la testigo, que usa pronombres femeninos para referirse a Winter.

Pairama fue supuestamente cubierta con una sábana antes de que Winter le tirara productos químicos. Cuando la adolescente estaba tendida en el suelo, Winter le preguntó cómo le gustaría que la mataran.

“[Winter] le pregunta: ‘cómo quieres morir, solo tienes hasta las tres en punto. Si no me lo dices,  te voy a apuñalar el cuello'”, dijo el testigo.

Las dos adolescentes se quedaron solas. La niña de 14 años dijo al tribunal que se ofreció a ayudar a Pairama a escapar.

“Le pregunté si estaba bien, me dijo que no. Va y dice que quiere ver a su abuela, y fue entonces cuando fui a coger su ropa y se la di… Le dije que saliera por la ventana y que se fuera lo más lejos que pudiera, pero dijo que estaba demasiado asustada. Me dijo que le dijera [a Winter] que quiere ahorcarse”.

El duo hizo una soga con sábanas e intentó colgar a Pairama. Su primer intento fracasó; sin embargo, el segundo intento resultó en la muerte de la adolescente. Después, arrojaron su cuerpo en un bidón de acero, donde fue descubierto detrás de la casa en Māngere en julio de 2018.

Durante la investigación, que duró tres semanas, Winter cambió repetidamente su historia, y Te Amo y Winter se echaron la culpa mutuamente del asesinato. Winter inicialmente afirmó que había observado impotente a Te Amo ahorcar a su “mejor hermana“.

En una entrevista con las autoridades, que fue grabada, Winter describió a Pairama como su “mejor amiga” a pesar de ni siquiera saber su nombre completo.

“No sé su nombre, puede que la conozca desde hace años. Solo la conozco como ‘Sis'” (diminutivo de “hermana”), afirmó Winter.

Pero la declaración fue contradicha directamente por la testigo adolescente, que dijo al tribunal que Winter había sido el “cabecilla” y que había conocido a Pairama el día antes del asesinato. Winter también había presumido de formar parte de una pandilla local llamada Mongrel Mob.

Más tarde, durante la investigación, Winter admitió haber golpeado a Pairama porque creía que la adolescente estaba haciendo correr rumores sobre él.

Resulta alarmante que durante la tortura de Pairama, un grupo de agentes de policía visitara la casa abandonada en la que Pairama estaba siendo retenida, buscando a un antiguo inquilino que vivía en la residencia. Pairama fue enviada a abrir la puerta, y los policías podían ver que estaba angustiada y que había estado llorando.

Winter intervino en la conversación y les dijo a los policías que acababa de romper con un novio y los despidió. Durante el juicio, un policía le dijo al tribunal que tenía la sensación de que Winter era “el jefe” en aquella situación.

La fiscal de la Corona, Natalie Walker, quien procesó a Winter y Te Amo, dijo que Winter tenía un alto riesgo de reincidencia. “Esta fue una agresión sádica y él era el cabecilla”, dijo Walker. “[Él] no acepta la responsabilidad”.

El abogado Matthew Goodwin, que representa a Winter, se aseguró de pedirle al jurado que no discrimine a Winter por identificarse como transgénero. Mencionó las “luchas” de Winter con la “transición de género” como un factor atenuante.

“En los momentos más oscuros de este caso, uno se pregunta si los acusados estaban descargando las frustraciones que sienten en sus vidas y eso contribuyó a una pérdida de autocontrol”, dijo Goodwin a la corte.

Sin embargo, uno de los abogados de Te Amo, Shane Tait, dijo a la corte que el sexo biológico de Winter fue un factor importante en el asesinato.

“En un juicio relacionado con asaltos y violencia, es importante que apreciemos que [él] no está allí abofeteando y golpeando como un gatito delicado; [él] está ahí con sus puños enormes y la fuerza de un macho”.

El juez Timothy Brewer dijo que Winter era claramente el delincuente “dominante” y que en general estaba “al mando” durante el brutal asesinato. Creía que Winter ejecutó a la adolescente “porque [él] encontraba la situación excitante”.

El duo fue sentenciado en 2019 en el Tribunal Superior de Auckland, y el veredicto fue unánime.

La cobertura mediática del caso se ha referido constantemente a Winter como una mujer y, en muchos casos, ni siquiera mencionó su condición de transgénero.

Winter fue sentenciado a un mínimo de 19 años y cuatro meses de cárcel, mientras que Te Amo recibió una condena de 19 años. Desde entonces, ambos han solicitado que se revoquen sus condenas y se reduzcan sus sentencias, pero sus solicitudes fueron desestimadas por el Tribunal de Apelación a principios de este año.

El 6 de septiembre, el Tribunal Supremo también emitió una sentencia que desestimaba la solicitud de autorización de Apelación de Winter, basada en motivos similares expuestos anteriormente por el Tribunal de Apelación.

No está claro dónde Winter está cumpliendo su sentencia de cadena perpetua, aunque una ciudadana de Nueva Zelanda, Sarah Fort, solicitó esta información al Departamento de Correcciones (DOC) en septiembre de 2020.

En respuesta, el representante del DOC, Robert Jones, le dijo a Fort que “la ubicación de personas transgénero e intersexuales en una prisión de hombres o mujeres, incluido el proceso para una revisión de la determinación inicial de la ubicación, se gestiona de acuerdo con el Manual de Operaciones Penitenciarias”.

El sitio web del DOC de Nueva Zelanda aconseja a los funcionarios de prisiones que “consideren el apoyo que una persona trans necesita y quiere mientras está en prisión”. Se requiere que el personal penitenciario discuta un plan de apoyo con los reclusos que se identifican como trans en los tres días posteriores a su recepción. Los hombres que reclaman una identidad femenina pueden recibir prótesis de senos, sujetadores y ropa interior femenina, y pueden optar por solicitar que los registren oficiales de prisiones de sexo femenino.

En abril de este año, otra ciudadana preocupada solicitó información sobre el número de presos que se identifican como trans y que actualmente se encuentran en prisiones de mujeres. Dianne Landy presentó una solicitud de las cifras, así como la cantidad de personas que tienen una calificación de seguridad de riesgo medio a alto.

El DOC volvió a responder de manera evasiva, sin proporcionar la información y retrasó su respuesta indefinidamente.


Reduxx es una nueva plataforma en pro de los derechos de la mujer y de los menores de edad con noticias y artículos. Somos 100% independientes! Colabora con nuestro proyecto uniéndote a nuestro Patreon

UK: Serial Pedophile Sent to Women’s Prison Following Conviction on 30 Counts Related to Child Sexual Abuse

Photo Source: Eddie Mitchell/THE DAILY MAIL

A transgender serial pedophile is being sent to a women’s prison in the United Kingdom following a conviction on 30 charges related to the sexual abuse of 7 children.

John Robert Dixon, 58, carried out abuse against five girls and two boys from 1989 to 1996, the youngest victim being 7 years old at the time. In 2004, Dixon began identifying as a woman named Sally Anne.

In July, a jury found Dixon guilty on 30 counts of indecent assault and indecency with a child for what was described as a campaign of sexual abuse against the seven victims. According to the Daily Mail, case prosecutor Ryan Richter labelled Dixon a “brazen and callous sexual predator” who exploited young males and “cultivated a toxic relationship” with the female victims.

The pedophile preyed upon children he had come to know through family connections, grooming them into trusting him. Some of the children were abused for months at a time, with Dixon victimizing them in his lock-up garage or caravan.

In 1997, Dixon was jailed for six months for the sexual abuse of one teenage boy, but it wasn’t until 2019 that Sussex Police launched a full-scale investigation into additional abuses after yet another victim came forward.

Today, a Judge at Lewes Crown Court declared that Dixon would be sentenced to serve a minimum of 12 years in custody before he could be eligible for parole. But, to the outrage of some, Dixon will be serving his time in a female prison. This is despite the fact Dixon does not have a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) — a document indicating a person has legally changed gender.

While GRCs are not expensive nor difficult to get, they do require an individual meet certain qualifications before being eligible, including that they have a diagnosis of gender dysphoria.

As a result of his lack of a GRC, Dr. Kate Coleman said the news of Dixon’s placement at HMC Bronzefield in Ashford “came as a shock.”

Coleman is the director of Keep Prisons Single Sex, a campaign group focused on advocating for prisons to be segregated by sex, not self-declared gender identity. She says that, as of the latest data, less than 1% of trans-identified male inmates without GRCs are housed in women’s prisons, while over 90% of those who have a GRC are.

“This seemed to signal a real shift in allocation, meaning that it was now very unlikely that someone without a GRC would be held in a women’s prison,” Coleman told Reduxx, noting that the standard appeared to indicate that male convicts with a history of violent or sexual crimes would not be sent to a female institution unless they had a GRC. She added: “This seemed to be some cause for optimism.”

As a result, Coleman expressed confusion by the decision to send Dixon to a women’s prison.

“This person has a prolific history of serious sexual offences against children and has received a lengthy prison sentence. Despite his convictions, he has been sent to a women’s prison where he will serve his sentence alongside women, many of whom have themselves been the victims of child sexual abuse.”

Coleman pointed out that HMP Bronzefield also houses young offenders who have particular vulnerabilities.

According to Keep Prisons Single Sex, 72% of incarcerated women are non-violent offenders. 23% of women are also first-time offenders, and half of incarcerated women report having been the victim of physical or sexual abuse as a child.

“I am horrified that the prison service has chosen not to include Dixon amongst the 99% of [trans-identified males] with no GRC who are held in the male estate.”

As of November 2021, there was only one trans-identified male without a GRC held in the female estate.


Reduxx is a newly-launched independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.

Trans-Identified Male Facing 72 Child Sexual Abuse Charges Released on Bail, Spared Men’s Jail

A man facing 72 charges related to child sexual assault has been released from custody on bail pending trial. The court reportedly refused to allow the man to be sent to a male detention center due to his transgender identity.

The 27-year-old man from Sydney, whose name has not yet been released to the media, has been charged with incest, assault, choking, sexual assault and acts of indecency allegedly committed against his two little sisters.

On Wednesday, the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) Children’s Court in Canberra heard that the two young girls, aged between 5 and 12, were assaulted over seven years – from 2006 until 2013. The abuse was only stopped after the defendant was confronted by their father and left the home.

As reported by ABC News, the prosecution told the court that the defendant choked the girls, and even held one child’s head under water in order to intimidate her into silence about the sexual abuse. The court also heard that the man threatened to harm the family pets.

Prosecutors said the defendant should not be granted bail due to a risk that he may try to frighten the victims and interfere with case evidence. However, the man’s lawyer argued that he should be released while awaiting trial on the basis that he had not recently approached the family.

Presiding Magistrate Jane Campbell agreed to release the man, despite acknowledging that he had been known to use violence to silence the girls in the past.

“[He] has been on notice since the allegation was made in 2013,” Magistrate Campbell said in justification for the release, continuing: “[He] has had no contact with the family since that time.” Throughout the hearing, the accused was referred to with feminine pronouns.

The court then weighed how best to care for the defendant’s health, expressing concern that he would be held at the Alexander Maconochie Centre (AMC), a facility in Canberra for male detainees.

Magistrate Campbell asserted that housing him in a jail for men would be unsuitable.

“To my grand astonishment, I am told [he] would be held in the male section of the AMC and that would clearly not be in the interests of a person who identifies as a woman,” Magistrate Campbell said.

The next hearing in the case is set for November.

If convicted, the man will likely be incarcerated in a women’s correctional facility, in accordance with gender identity policies being implemented across the country.

Legislation enacted by the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) explicitly states that “self-identification as a member of a sex other than a person’s gender of birth is the only criterion for recognition as transgender,” and that the “placement of transgender prisoners will be based on the gender the prisoner identifies with.”

Last month, female inmates at Australia’s largest women’s correctional facility in Victoria launched a petition to have a trans-identified male sex offender removed out of fears for their own safety.

Women at the Dame Phyllis Frost Correctional Centre told the Herald Sun that a trans-identifying male offender convicted of sexual offenses against women and children was moved to the facility on July 5.

While the name of the transferred inmate was not released, Reduxx determined that the details from the criminal’s background mirror that of Lisa Jones, a trans-identified male who had been sentenced to 3 years and 3 months in prison for sexually assaulting a woman last year. During his trial, it was revealed that Jones also had a prior record for sexually abusing a 6-year-old girl in Germany.

Since at least 2018, Corrections Victoria has been allowing convicted male offenders that identify as transgender to be housed in women’s prisons, according to the petition.

The petition asserted that “the mental well-being of many of the women was severely compromised” after they learned that male convicts would be transferred into the correctional facility. “We feel threatened, unsafe, distressed and traumatised with this current situation.”

Research highlighted by Women’s Forum Australia illustrates how female prisoners are particularly vulnerable members of society. They are more likely to have a history of physical and sexual abuse than male prisoners, and are more likely to have mental health problems. According to research provided by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, nearly 1 in 3 female inmates report a history of self-harm.


Reduxx is your independent source of pro-woman, pro-child safeguarding news and commentary. We’re 100% reader-funded! Support our mission by joining our Patreon, or consider making a one-time donation.